What's new

China (Finally) Admits to Hacking

BoQ77

BANNED
Joined
Jul 29, 2012
Messages
8,704
Reaction score
0
Country
Viet Nam
Location
Viet Nam
An updated military document for the first time admits that the Chinese government sponsors offensive cyber units.

shannon-tiezzi-36x36.png

By Shannon Tiezzi
March 18, 2015

China’s military has finally pulled back the curtain on its cyber strategy, admitting for the first time that it (like countries around the world) has cyber units set up not only for defense, but for attack.

Officially, China’s line has always been that its government does not sponsor any form of hacking. Those denials rang hollow to foreign experts, however, who pointed both to evidence of Chinese cyberattacks and to the sheer folly of a country of China’s size and global importance not including cyberespionage in its intelligence-gathering arsenal.

Now Beijing may finally be ready to drop the charade. The updated edition of The Science of Military Strategy, an authoritative analysis of China’s military thinking, includes references to China’s cyber-warfare units. “This is the first time we’ve seen an explicit acknowledgement of the existence of China’s secretive cyber-warfare forces from the Chinese side,” Joe McReynolds of the Center for Intelligence Research and Analysis told The Daily Beast. “[T]hey’ve come out and said, ‘Yes, we do in fact have network attack forces, and we have teams on both the military and civilian-government sides.’”

The Science of Military Strategy, published in Chinese in 2001 (and translated into English in 2007) is a staple reference not only for Western scholars but for senior PLA strategists and decision makers, explains Andrew Erickson, an expert on Chinese military affairs at the U.S. Naval War College. The updated edition was published in Chinese in December 2013 but only recently became available to foreign analysts. China is well aware that the book is widely studied by foreign experts as well as Chinese military thinkers, meaning the reference to cyber-attack forces was likely a carefully considered decision.

McReynolds said China has dedicated cyber units operating in both the military and the civilian sphere. Within the PLA, China has “specialized military network warfare forces” for carrying out both offensive and defense cyber operations. China also has cyber specialists within civilian organizations, including the Ministry of State Security and the Ministry of Public Security, “authorized by the military to carry out network warfare operations.”

China has previously acknowledged that its military employs cyber experts – for example, a story about a 30-person “Blue Army” of PLA cyber-specialists made headlines in 2011. However, China continued to insist that its cyber capabilities were 100 percent focused on defending Chinese networks, rather than probing foreign systems for information or weaknesses. “The Blue Army’s main target is self-defense. We won’t initiate an attack on anyone,” a senior PLA official insisted when news of the unit’s existence broke.

Foreign Ministry and Defense Ministry spokespeople have likewise consistently and categorically denied that the Chinese government sponsors hacking activities of any kind. Now that The Science of Military Strategy has stated otherwise, “[t]hey can’t make that claim anymore,” McReynolds said.

The news that China does, in fact, have units of cyber spies won’t be “earth-shattering” to foreign experts, James Lewis, an expert on China’s cyber strategies at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told The Daily Beast (see here for more from Lewis on China’s cyber activities). However, the new openness on the part of the PLA could have long-lasting implications if it does turn out to be part of a policy shift.

The U.S. government has been seeking to entice more PLA transparency on cyber issues by openly explaining its own cyber-strategy. Those overtures hadn’t paid off – China continued to block any real discussion by denying it partakes in any cyber-espionage activities. The acknowledgement of offensive cyber units in The Science of Military Strategy may mean that Beijing is increasing cyber transparency, which could pave the way for discussions on the issue.
 
.
Another attempt by US to take the heat off them after humiliating expose by Snowden of NSA extensive hacking, cyber warfare by pentagon against other countries.

Just like how obama try to stop allies joining AIIB which always end up as failure or futile attempt. Imperialist will always be imperialist.

US shall focus more on its behavioour and conduct instead of accusing others with smearing and always trying to drag others in.
 
.
I hope China does that. But, the US certainly does, and I envy them.

To monitor, spy and hack is much better than being monitored, spied and hacked. I hope China is as good as its haters think it is.

***

U.S. mass surveillance becomes routine: Snowden
2015-03-19 10:41Xinhua Web Editor: Gu Liping

Mass surveillance of U.S. intelligence agencies has become routine, said American whistleblower Edward Snowden Wednesday while addressing the CeBIT.

"Extensive monitoring has become routine," said Snowden while taking a video interview at the annual IT trade fair taking place in Germany.

"Thus, the activities of the NSA have become invisible. Even in the White House," he added.

The whistleblower further said that surveillance was not confined to the United States.

Citing the GCHQ as example, Snowden said the British intelligence agency "has developed programs to monitor webcams which affects billions of people."

Speaking about possibilities of a return to the United States, Snowden, who is currently staying in Russia on a three-year residence permit, said "there is no dictation of terms, if I wanted to go home. It would be the best for the U.S. government, too."

He specifically noted that IT experts were also targets of intelligence agencies because they "have access to systems, infrastructure and private records, calling on people working in this industry to come together to protect communication and improve security."

Glenn Greenwald, who had published leaks that exposed the NSA monitoring program "Prism" on the basis of classified documents from Snowden, also showed up on Wednesday.

The American journalist ruled out a complete release of documents from Snowden, saying the secret papers include too much information about people that are being monitored.

"It would be a violation of their privacy if we release all those informations," he added.
 
. . . . . . . .
Another attempt by US to take the heat off them after humiliating expose by Snowden of NSA extensive hacking, cyber warfare by pentagon against other countries.

Just like how obama try to stop allies joining AIIB which always end up as failure or futile attempt. Imperialist will always be imperialist.

US shall focus more on its behavioour and conduct instead of accusing others with smearing and always trying to drag others in.
Relax on the imperialist remarks. There is nothing wrong with being an imperialist. Blame your country for being weak in the past.
 
.
It's just an open secret everybody knows, all strong powers are hacking. Only weak ones are listening to strong powers' warning: don't hack!
“Do as I say, not as I do!”
LOL

Relax on the imperialist remarks. There is nothing wrong with being an imperialist. Blame your country for being weak in the past.
It has a subtly different
In Chinese culture we found two way to become a super power
王道 and 霸道
霸道 is hegemonism way or way to hegemonism
But 王道 is difficult for translating
the second word 道 means way or style,and the first word 王has many meaning like kingly(but king in Chinese has different meaning)
I think 王道should be interpreted as The best way with justice and mercy to be a super power
imperialism is not a good word,it's 霸道,dead end
 
. .
“Do as I say, not as I do!”
LOL


It has a subtly different
In Chinese culture we found two way to become a super power
王道 and 霸道
霸道 is hegemonism way or way to hegemonism
But 王道 is difficult for translating
the second word 道 means way or style,and the first word 王has many meaning like kingly(but king in Chinese has different meaning)
I think 王道should be interpreted as The best way with justice and mercy to be a super power
imperialism is not a good word,it's 霸道,dead end

How did China expand? If it Qin thought like most Chinese here, China would still be seven kingdoms.

There is no moral or immoral way to get things done. The key is you get it done, through hook or crook. China exerted power in the past by exporting her culture. It worked to a point, but bringing civility to other countries do not mean they need to like you or follow you in international affairs.

Only a combination of military might, strong economy, being a leader in R&D, science and high living standards. Only than will others tolerate /respect you.
 
.
How did China expand? If it Qin thought like most Chinese here, China would still be seven kingdoms.

There is no moral or immoral way to get things done. The key is you get it done, through hook or crook. China exerted power in the past by exporting her culture. It worked to a point, but bringing civility to other countries do not mean they need to like you or follow you in international affairs.

Only a combination of military might, strong economy, being a leader in R&D, science and high living standards. Only than will others tolerate /respect you.
It has a subtly different
Mencius said“君子有不战,战必胜矣”——“gentleman do not fight, fighting necessarily wins . ”
Work and Rob can getget money either, but rob is at risk
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom