What's new

China acknowledges 'cancer villages'

BDforever

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
14,387
Reaction score
8
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Bangladesh
China's environment ministry appears to have acknowledged the existence of so-called "cancer villages" after years of public speculation about the impact of pollution in certain areas.

For years campaigners have said cancer rates in some villages near factories and polluted waterways have shot up.

But the term "cancer village" has no technical definition and the ministry's report did not elaborate on it.

There have been many calls for China to be more transparent on pollution.

The latest report from the environment ministry is entitled "Guard against and control risks presented by chemicals to the environment during the 12th Five-Year period (2011-2015)".

It says that the widespread production and consumption of harmful chemicals forbidden in many developed nations are still found in China.

"The toxic chemicals have caused many environmental emergencies linked to water and air pollution," it said.

The report goes on to acknowledge that such chemicals could pose a long-term risk to human health, making a direct link to the so-called "cancer villages".

"There are even some serious cases of health and social problems like the emergence of cancer villages in individual regions," it said.
Beijing smog

The BBC's Martin Patience in Beijing says that as China has experienced rapid development, stories about so-called cancer villages have become more frequent.

And China has witnessed growing public anger over air pollution and industrial waste caused by industrial development.

Media coverage of conditions in these so-called "cancer villages" has been widespread. In 2009, one Chinese journalist published a map identifying dozens of apparently affected villages.

In 2007 the BBC visited the small hamlet of Shangba in southern China where one scientist was studying the cause and effects of pollution on the village.

He found high levels of poisonous heavy metals in the water and believed there was a direct connection between incidences of cancer and mining in the area.

Until now, there has been little comment from the government on such allegations.

Environmental lawyer Wang Canfa, who runs a pollution aid centre in Beijing, told the AFP news agency that it was the first time the "cancer village" phrase had appeared in a ministry document.

Last month - Beijing - and several other cities - were blanketed in smog that soared past levels considered hazardous by the World Health Organisation.

The choking pollution provoked a public outcry and led to a highly charged debate about the costs of the country's rapid economic development, our correspondent says.

source: BBC News - China acknowledges 'cancer villages'
 
I'm not interested in sensationalized labels. Does anyone have the Cancer rates by country? How does China compared to other countries? Lets get that sorted out before running around like headless chickens.
 
This is what I've been able to dig up on China

"The cancer mortality rate in China is about 144 per 100,000 people, according to the WHO in Geneva. That compares with 123 per 100,000 in the U.S., 135 in the U.K. and 76 in India. "

That sucks but, relatively speaking, China is as bad as many countries.

Same stats indicating mortality per 100,000 from other countries. Data for cancer frequency by country | WCRF

I'd love to see pollution go down anywhere in the world but if China is heavily polluted and Canada isn't, why are Canadians dying of Cancer at higher rates than in China?
 
This is what I've been able to dig up on China

"The cancer mortality rate in China is about 144 per 100,000 people, according to the WHO in Geneva. That compares with 123 per 100,000 in the U.S., 135 in the U.K. and 76 in India. "

That sucks but, relatively speaking, China is as bad as many countries.

You should compare the rate in those cancer villages with other places in China, not other countries.
 
Specific cancer deaths rates:

Lung Cancer:

LUNG CANCERS DEATH RATE BY COUNTRY

Thanks for the stats. However, China has a large population that consumes tobacco inhalant products. I doubt there are many Chinese out there that would deny that. How can we be sure these rates are due to tobacco or pollution.

You should compare the rate in those cancer villages with other places in China, not other countries.

Agreed. I'd like to see the stats.

But the correlation is cancer and pollution. In this case, it would be relevant to compare pollution levels and cancer rates of different countries.

Editted: My bad. It mentions smog as well.
 
This is what I've been able to dig up on China

"The cancer mortality rate in China is about 144 per 100,000 people, according to the WHO in Geneva. That compares with 123 per 100,000 in the U.S., 135 in the U.K. and 76 in India. "

That sucks but, relatively speaking, China is as bad as many countries.

Same stats indicating mortality per 100,000 from other countries. Data for cancer frequency by country | WCRF

I'd love to see pollution go down anywhere in the world but if China is heavily polluted and Canada isn't, why are Canadians dying of Cancer at higher rates than in China?

It is all simple biology and food science. Canadians and other developed western nation eat foods that contain excessive lipids (fats) and chemical compounds like Carbon monixde (to make meat look red rather than brown). This chemicals helps damage the structure of cells that absorbs them hydrophilically and thus damage the genetic programming of an cell causing them to mutate via excessive cell-division (meiosis). The Chinese and fellow Sinocentirc nations like Japan and Korea eat foods which are more healthier on average than Westerners thus giving them higher IQ levels via protein and helps keep life expectancy higher (i.e. HK and Japan)
 
Back
Top Bottom