What's new

Canada court trashes Padma Bridge graft allegation

Russell

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
1,152
Reaction score
0
Canada court trashes Padma Bridge graft allegation
Independent Online Desk
snc.gif

A Canada court has dismissed the graft allegation in Padma Bridge project and acquitted three business executives of SNC-Lavalin Group Inc. throwing out wiretap evidence and saying the wiretap applications were based on gossip and rumour, reports the Globe and Mail.

Justice Ian Nordheimer of the Ontario Superior Court ruled that he had serious concerns about three applications the RCMP filed in 2011 to get court approval to use wiretaps. The RCMP had sought the approval as it probed allegations that SNC staff planned to bribe officials in Bangladesh to try to win a $50-million (US) contract to supervise construction on the country's PadmaBridge project.

"Reduced to its essentials, the information provided in the [wiretap applications] was nothing more than speculation, gossip and rumour," Judge Nordheimer concluded.

"Nothing that could fairly be referred to as direct factual evidence, to support the rumour and speculation, was provided or investigated. The information provided by the tipsters was hearsay (or worse) added to other hearsay."


The RCMP originally charged five people with corruption in the case, but charges against two of the accused – Mohammad Ismail and Abul Hasan Chowdhury – were previously dropped.

The case against the remaining three accused – former SNC vice-president of energy and infrastructure Kevin Wallace, former SNC vice-president of international development Ramesh Shah, and Bangladeshi-Canadian businessman Zulfiquar Ali Bhuiyan – ended on Friday when Judge Nordheimer acquitted all three.


The decision came after Crown attorney Tanit Gilliam elected to call no witnesses at the trial following the judge's decision to exclude wiretap evidence.

"The Crown had the opportunity to reassess the case and concluded we had no reasonable prospect of conviction based on the evidence," Gilliam told the court.

Assuming office in 1996, the Awami League government initiated the project in 1998 for the first time. After returning to power in 2009, it revived the initiative.

The World Bank initially proposed funding much of the project but on June 29, 2012, it cancelled its $1.2 billion funding for the bridge project, saying it had proof of a "corruption conspiracy" involving Bangladeshi officials, executives of a Canadian firm and some individuals.

A case was filed with a court in Canada in this connection and the hearing in Canadian court began in April 2013.


http://www.theindependentbd.com/post/80314
-------------------------------------------------

The decision came after Crown attorney Tanit Gilliam elected to call no witnesses at the trial following the judge’s decision to exclude wiretap evidence.

“The Crown had the opportunity to reassess the case and concluded we had no reasonable prospect of conviction based on the evidence,” Ms. Gilliam told the court.


She would not comment further following the hearing.

Mr. Wallace’s lawyer, Scott Fenton, said the Crown made the right decision to end the case, noting the RCMP relied on the same evidence for approval for search warrants, and he was prepared to similarly challenge those documents.

“My client is greatly relieved that the matter is at an end and he has been vindicated with a verdict of not guilty,” Mr. Fenton said after the trial.

Frank Addario, who represented Mr. Bhuijan, said he did not want to comment in detail in case the Crown appeals the wiretap decision, but said his client will resume his life “and try to put it back together.”

David Cousins, who represented Mr. Shah, said the RCMP clearly should have done more work to validate the credentials and credibility of the informants, observing that one of them turned out to be an employee of an SNC competitor who had lied in another matter.

“Mr. Shah has undergone a terrible ordeal over the past four years – he’s been unemployable; he’s had his passport seized from him,” Mr. Cousins said. “His liberties have been really greatly impinged on.”

In his ruling, Judge Nordheimer said much of the information provided in the wiretap applications came from e-mails sent by three anonymous or unreliable tipsters. He said police had not attempted to first interview other sources, even though informants had named people they said police should contact.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/repo...acquitted-in-corruption-case/article33979762/



There was a conspiracy - conspiracy by a group of people against the govt and one Dr. Shudkhor aka Yunus readily joined in....so, where are all the mofos at now? Cat got your tongue? No wait...let me guess - the Canadian Court system is owned by AL too :lol:

Final Score: Sheikh Hasina 1 - Piece of shits - 0
 
Last edited:
.
Everyone got set free and the judge went so far as to say - the evidence was

speculation....gossip....rumors....and at best hearsay or added to other hearsay...

talk about a complete smackdown.
 
.
Jesus christ! As much I love Candian judiciary system for thoroughly checking into the allegation but WTF?! It's shameless how some people went above and beyond to turnish our country's name just for political motif. Sure SHW and BAL are no saints but at least try to fight fire with water. I hope this gets published by major newspapers.

And do you know any allegation that Dr. Yunus was behind it @Russell? I know BAL likes to pull his chain from nowband then. And I don't like what they did with his Grameen Bank one bit. I heard BAL feared he might've been trying to get into politics and got after him.
 
.
HOLY COW!

I hope this gets published by major newspapers.

They already did.

And do you know any allegation that Dr. Yunus was behind it @Russell? I know BAL likes to pull his chain from nowband then. And I don't like what they did with his Grameen Bank one bit. I heard BAL feared he might've been trying to get into politics and got after him.

Dr. Yunus? I don't think so. He never said anything conclusive about entering politics. Something like Ami politics e dookhano ekono chinta kore nai line. The media fanned that one out, and that made the AL nervous. Though, I don't see any reason for them to be.

It sounds more like a conspiracy among the competing financiers themselves. It would surely put spotlight into WB's credibility. A lot of time flew by with this one.
 
.
@Sybaris Caeser of course I don't have any proof...I'm just being dramatic :lol: Dr. Yunus didn't instigate this - other competitors, local agents of powers and the WB itself (you know how this shit works...they probably wanted someone else to get the contract) and when things started to go bad...Dr. Yunus jumped on the bandwagon...he was obviously pissed off about his personal issue and decided to exert his influence through his channels.

As for the Grameen Bank 'thing' - they simply implemented the LAW. The bank does not belong to HIM - people forget, the govt used to be the majority shareholder in Grameen Bank it's down to only 8% now.

His politics thing...no one cares about man. People can curse at Hasina and Khaleda all they want, but the fact remains - millions will march for them, hundreds will die for them....Yunus has Hillary and so called 'shushil shomaj'.

The country's central bank removed Prof Yunus, 71, from his post last month, saying his continuing work at Grameen Bank violated laws that public servants must retire at the age of 60.

Grameen was made its own, independent bank in 1983. Yunus served as the government-appointed managing director. Eventually, his position was changed so that he answered to the board of directors; however, the chairman remained a government appointee. The government's ownership was also gradually reduced from an initial 60/40 majority to 25 percent, which it held with its Somali Bank and the Bangladesh Krishi Bank. The other 75 percent (by 1993, 88 percent) was owned by the bank's members themselves.
 
Last edited:
.
As for the Grameen Bank 'thing' - they simply implemented the LAW.

So, what about Muhith? Or does that law doesn't apply to them? :what:

People can curse at Hasina and Khaleda all they want, but the fact remains - millions will march for them, hundreds will die for them.

They'd stupid to do so. Unless of-course, there is money involved.

No one would march for them for free nowadays. Death is out of the question.
 
Last edited:
.
Yunus and politics - Check the then affairs of Yunus with Moinuddin-Fakuruddin govt. The "minus 2" movement. Even during 2013-2014 his affairs with BNP on presidency. Even leaked Hilary-Hasina conversation on Yunus Grammen Bank and Noble prize bullcrap.
 
.
So, what about Muhith? Or does that law doesn't apply to them? :what:

They'd stupid to do so. Unless of-course, there is money involved.

No one would march for them for free nowadays. Death is out of the question.
I never said people were smart...but that's the reality in this country. If we were smart - we would have gotten out of family politics...but, hey, thats a discussion for another day.

You make a valid point about politicians and old age...but, this is law set for all banks and although it's not a popular law (many have criticized it http://archive.dhakatribune.com/business/2016/jun/12/md-crisis-hits-financial-sector-hard) but Dr. Yunus is the only one who refused to leave.
 
.
I never said people were smart...but that's the reality in this country. If we were smart - we would have gotten out of family politics...but, hey, thats a discussion for another day.

They do it for the money. That's it.

There's one time when they did it for free.

By the way, the theory that Dr. Yunus tried to influence to cancel WB funding of Padma Bridge is in a way fictitious in itself. There is no proof of that either.
 
.
Anyways....don't care about Dr. Yunus - I couldn't help get a little dig in...I'm petty like that :lol:

Poor Syed Abul Hossain- dude had to give up his ministry and other than the PM no one had his back - bet he feels a real sense of vindication today. Thing that really pissed me off about the Padma Bridge stuff was - we have enough REAL corruption in this country (I know for a fact Nanok is corrupt to the core - he demanded x amount of taka to sort out an issue for my family) without people having to invent fake scenarios.

It's great the govt is making the bridge now - but, if this bullshit conspiracy hadn't been hatched, the bridge would already have been built (probably finished a couple of years ago) - the country would already be reaping the benefits and let's not forget the very easy terms of WB loans when it comes to repayment.
 
Last edited:
. .
Stop putting every western countries judiciary on a pedestal. Many cases of blatant miscarriage of justice when their country is at odds with a foreign govt , firm or individual.For eg Its legal for Germans to 'facilitate' faster customs clearance in many countries , while illegal in Germany.
Also the case of the air India flight which was blown up by sikh terrorists in Canada never saw any convictions because the canadian govt didnt want to antagonize its key vote bank of sikhs in canada.
While you make a valid point - the US justice system is a very good example....those of us from Bangladesh know - how sensitive an issue this case was.

When the Canadian courts asked the WB to testify - they balked. Whereas they thought nothing of backing out of a billion dollar project, which was crucial to Bangladesh, citing proof of criminal conspiracy. This case went through the Canadian court system and the prosecution itself decided - they didn't have the required evidence to get a conviction!

WB refuses to assist the courts:
In court last year, lawyers for the men demanded that the World Bank hand over all of its files related to the case, including those the RCMP relied upon to secure its wiretaps. Production of these kinds of documents would be not be unusual in a routine domestic criminal case, to allow the defence to scrutinize a police investigation for using unreliable witnesses, such as those with an axe to grind, or for relying on flimsy information.

But the World Bank refused to participate in the court hearing on the issue, insisting that its status as an international organization grants it immunity and that it could not be compelled to turn over any documents.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/repo...to-be-heard-by-supreme-court/article25236083/
 
.
Canada court trashes Padma Bridge graft allegation
Independent Online Desk
snc.gif

A Canada court has dismissed the graft allegation in Padma Bridge project and acquitted three business executives of SNC-Lavalin Group Inc. throwing out wiretap evidence and saying the wiretap applications were based on gossip and rumour, reports the Globe and Mail.

Justice Ian Nordheimer of the Ontario Superior Court ruled that he had serious concerns about three applications the RCMP filed in 2011 to get court approval to use wiretaps. The RCMP had sought the approval as it probed allegations that SNC staff planned to bribe officials in Bangladesh to try to win a $50-million (US) contract to supervise construction on the country's PadmaBridge project.

"Reduced to its essentials, the information provided in the [wiretap applications] was nothing more than speculation, gossip and rumour," Judge Nordheimer concluded.

"Nothing that could fairly be referred to as direct factual evidence, to support the rumour and speculation, was provided or investigated. The information provided by the tipsters was hearsay (or worse) added to other hearsay."


The RCMP originally charged five people with corruption in the case, but charges against two of the accused – Mohammad Ismail and Abul Hasan Chowdhury – were previously dropped.

The case against the remaining three accused – former SNC vice-president of energy and infrastructure Kevin Wallace, former SNC vice-president of international development Ramesh Shah, and Bangladeshi-Canadian businessman Zulfiquar Ali Bhuiyan – ended on Friday when Judge Nordheimer acquitted all three.


The decision came after Crown attorney Tanit Gilliam elected to call no witnesses at the trial following the judge's decision to exclude wiretap evidence.

"The Crown had the opportunity to reassess the case and concluded we had no reasonable prospect of conviction based on the evidence," Gilliam told the court.

Assuming office in 1996, the Awami League government initiated the project in 1998 for the first time. After returning to power in 2009, it revived the initiative.

The World Bank initially proposed funding much of the project but on June 29, 2012, it cancelled its $1.2 billion funding for the bridge project, saying it had proof of a "corruption conspiracy" involving Bangladeshi officials, executives of a Canadian firm and some individuals.

A case was filed with a court in Canada in this connection and the hearing in Canadian court began in April 2013.


http://www.theindependentbd.com/post/80314
-------------------------------------------------

The decision came after Crown attorney Tanit Gilliam elected to call no witnesses at the trial following the judge’s decision to exclude wiretap evidence.

“The Crown had the opportunity to reassess the case and concluded we had no reasonable prospect of conviction based on the evidence,” Ms. Gilliam told the court.


She would not comment further following the hearing.

Mr. Wallace’s lawyer, Scott Fenton, said the Crown made the right decision to end the case, noting the RCMP relied on the same evidence for approval for search warrants, and he was prepared to similarly challenge those documents.

“My client is greatly relieved that the matter is at an end and he has been vindicated with a verdict of not guilty,” Mr. Fenton said after the trial.

Frank Addario, who represented Mr. Bhuijan, said he did not want to comment in detail in case the Crown appeals the wiretap decision, but said his client will resume his life “and try to put it back together.”

David Cousins, who represented Mr. Shah, said the RCMP clearly should have done more work to validate the credentials and credibility of the informants, observing that one of them turned out to be an employee of an SNC competitor who had lied in another matter.

“Mr. Shah has undergone a terrible ordeal over the past four years – he’s been unemployable; he’s had his passport seized from him,” Mr. Cousins said. “His liberties have been really greatly impinged on.”

In his ruling, Judge Nordheimer said much of the information provided in the wiretap applications came from e-mails sent by three anonymous or unreliable tipsters. He said police had not attempted to first interview other sources, even though informants had named people they said police should contact.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/repo...acquitted-in-corruption-case/article33979762/



There was a conspiracy - conspiracy by a group of people against the govt and one Dr. Shudkhor aka Yunus readily joined in....so, where are all the mofos at now? Cat got your tongue? No wait...let me guess - the Canadian Court system is owned by AL too :lol:

Final Score: Sheikh Hasina 1 - Piece of shits - 0
i thought dr. yunus was a good man... well truth is out now isnt it? no wonder why the govt. was so against him and why the amerian ambassador became his lobbyist in dhaka.
 
.
i thought dr. yunus was a good man... well truth is out now isnt it? no wonder why the govt. was so against him and why the amerian ambassador became his lobbyist in dhaka.
He is a 'good' man - as good a man as any of us are. People wanted to make him into some benevolent saint - he wasn't and isn't. In the end, like anyone with any power - he wanted to hang on to it and when things didn't go his way (like our politicians, he decided to throw a temper tantrum).

Tbf - this wasn't his doing....I just thought, he shouldn't have piped in when the govt was in a tough spot. Because AL lost nothing from it - but the people of Bangladesh??
 
.
He is a 'good' man - as good a man as any of us are. People wanted to make him into some benevolent saint - he wasn't and isn't. In the end, like anyone with any power - he wanted to hang on to it and when things didn't go his way (like our politicians, he decided to throw a temper tantrum).

Tbf - this wasn't his doing....I just thought, he shouldn't have piped in when the govt was in a tough spot. Because AL lost nothing from it - but the people of Bangladesh??
exactly... he should have thought of his country first over his benefits... he already has everything he needs to live for the rest of his life...
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom