What's new

Can India Break The China-Pakistan Axis?

.
India has a problem. It is called over-population and poverty. We have to solve the problems of our people before teaching other lessons.

I look at what Russia, USA and Pakistan did. Have anyone of them made Afghanistan more stable ?

Before 1971 Pakistan was 1/3 of India. That is a good size to deter a larger country indefinitely. In 1971 India did perform a surgical breakup of Pakistan. In retrospect India should have seized Northern Territory and Balistan to server land link with China. Beyond that India has no business in Pakistan. If Pakistanis cannot govern Pakistan what chance do the pathetic Hindoos have ?




You've obviously forgot August the 14th 1947, when a Muslim minority tore, ripped, dismembered & opened wide the legs of mother india to create Pakistan from conquered indian territory :devil:

And there's NOTHING the indians can do to EVER get that conquered indian territory back :chilli:

The creation of bangladesh was just as inevitable as the creation of Pakistan. The reason being: RACIAL DIFFERENCES that fundamentally cannot be bridged. In 1947, india simply took advantage if this fact.

The Mukti Bahini had nothing to show for after 8 months of fighting.
Indian army routed the Pakistani forces in 2 weeks

hyenas is not a joke. Lions fear them for a good reason

spare me this indus/ganga babble. 50% of Indians are nowhere near the Ganges



So then what happened after mumbai 2008 & uri 2016? That too despite the fact that india is more than 7x bigger than us and has abundant access to the world's most advanced weapons systems whilst we are denied this privilege:azn:..........so indians are good for fighting for bangladeshis but not for themselves?...............you people are all talk

This is silly.

India doesn't need to do anything.

Given enough time, and long enough rope , Pakistan is quite capable to do it without any outside interference.




Just like you indians vehemently proclaimed that Pakistan would NEVER EVER become a nuclear weapons state with or without Chinese assistance............heard your failed indianisms all before.

India has only one solution and Gen. Bakshi alluded to it. India needs to grow balls that are commensurate with it's size. The problem India has is simple. It was a whimp, it is a whimp and will continue being a whimp.

As the good General mentioned look at what US did, look what what Pak did, look at what Russia is doing. And yes today India's options are rather limited as the host mentioned but I would like to ask him what was India doing in 1940s, 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, 1980s before the nuclear deterant licked in? India had the size, India had the resources advantage against a tiny country. It should have knocked Pakistan out during all those decades. Pakistan would not have even been able to get up let alone cause trouble.

Any other country (not a big puffed up cow) would have conquered by force Pakistan administered Kashmir and then destroyed Pakistan Army. It would have then made sure Pakistan unravels as a functioning state - this would have left Pakistan to focus on standing up again or surviving let alone causing trouble to India.

But then Ganga would need to grow a set - which she does not have.


* For 70 years India has failed to tame Pakistan. Today it can do sweet all.So learn to take it.




Fact of the matter remains and should the truth be told, india CANNOT do ANYTHING to Pakistan apart from talk, rant and rave on the internet and persistently complain about us. That's all they can do. Let the dogs barks as long as they remain weak and powerless to do anything to us. I am perfectly happy with this arrangement.
 
.
Just like you indians vehemently proclaimed that Pakistan would NEVER EVER become a nuclear weapons state with or without Chinese assistance............heard your failed indianisms all before.
.

You keep repeating this. Who said that? And when? Exactly how Pakistan became a nuclear state we cannot discuss for obvious reasons.

And you're sitting there in the U.K. discussing the impossibility of living in harmony with another race. I can never tell if you are serious or not. I am assuming this is a joke?

Let me say again, no one needs to try and break up anything. Given enough time and enough rope Pakistan is more than capable of poisoning any relationship with anyone without any help.
 
.
You keep repeating this. Who said that? And when? Exactly how Pakistan became a nuclear state we cannot discuss for obvious reasons.

And you're sitting there in the U.K. discussing the impossibility of living in harmony with another race. I can never tell if you are serious or not. I am assuming this is a joke?

Let me say again, no one needs to try and break up anything. Given enough time and enough rope Pakistan is more than capable of poisoning any relationship with anyone without any help.



Are we supposed to believe what an indian says about Pakistan????????.........:lol:........that is akin to a someone believing what a German Nazi said about Jews in the 1940s...........there lies the punchline and joke.............:lol:

FYI Multiculturalism may be possible in Western countries but not possible in most of Asia/Middle East. Especially if one race does not want to be dominated & subdues by another one.
 
.
Are you seriously taking the credit for fall of bangladesh and actually Acquitting ZAB from not giving mujib his due political right ?

Youre total opposite of wise

Is it hard for you to comprehend ?
Indian army ended the military operations in 2 weeks with help from Mukti Bahini.
Mukti Bahini fought Pakistani army for 8 months with no territory to show for.

Cut off from mainland ans supplies that is not at all a feat.
If that is so what does it tell you about the IQ level of the Pakistani army generals who think they can defend East Pakistan against India ?

FYI Multiculturalism may be possible in Western countries but not possible in most of Asia/Middle East. Especially if one race does not want to be dominated & subdues by another one.

There is nothing in common between Pakistanis and British
You should quit being hypocrite and get out of UK
Practise what you preach
 
.
Is it hard for you to comprehend ?
Indian army ended the military operations in 2 weeks with help from Mukti Bahini.
Mukti Bahini fought Pakistani army for 8 months with no territory to show for.


If that is so what does it tell you about the IQ level of the Pakistani army generals who think they can defend East Pakistan against India ?



There is nothing in common between Pakistanis and British
You should quit being hypocrite and get out of UK
Practise what you preach




And there's so much in common with indians and the English........they even look the same..............:disagree:


Speaking of IQ, the average IQ for the indian race is 82 wheras that for the White race it is 100 and for China it is 106. That explains a lot:

https://iq-research.info/en/page/average-iq-by-country#
 
.
I look it as a different way...I don't see there is any China - Pakistan axis, but China using Pakistan to contain India. China knows that an emerging India is threat to Chinese superpower status and it make sense for China to bog down India.
 
.
I look it as a different way...I don't see there is any China - Pakistan axis, but China using Pakistan to contain India. China knows that an emerging India is threat to Chinese superpower status and it make sense for China to bog down India.
Yeah, but its hardly a marriage made in heaven.

The couple are polar opposites

Chinese are irreligious - Pakistanis love their religion more than anything else

Chinese are calculating and difficult to provoke - Pakistanis are emotional, passionate and live in a constant state of provocation

Chinese want to modernize and westernize - Pakistanis place high value on traditional customs way of life

Chinese are business men - Pakistanis can't spell business and have no use for ROI

Chinese tend to be understated and introverted - Pakistanis live for high volume drama and larger than life gestures


....as I said ....enough time.....enough rope.....
 
.
Yeah, but its hardly a marriage made in heaven.

The couple are polar opposites

Chinese are irreligious - Pakistanis love their religion more than anything else

Chinese are calculating and difficult to provoke - Pakistanis are emotional, passionate and live in a constant state of provocation

Chinese want to modernize and westernize - Pakistanis place high value on traditional customs way of life

Chinese are business men - Pakistanis can't spell business and have no use for ROI

Chinese tend to be understated and introverted - Pakistanis live for high volume drama and larger than life gestures


....as I said ....enough time.....enough rope.....

And China-Pakistan axis is only against India. If Iran or US or Afghanistan are involved in a spite with Pakistan there is no more China-Pakistan axis.
 
.
it hard for you to comprehend ?
Indian army ended the military operations in 2 weeks with help from Mukti Bahini.
Mukti Bahini fought Pakistani army for 8 months with no territory to show for.
I know you not very intelligent and I shouldn't expect anything better this time.
I only object the wrong attribute you give to fall of Dhaka to your cowars hyena forces when they fought us. India had zero role to play. It only struck when we were at weakest and is proud shamefully.
The fall of Dhaka was becvuas of our policies. We couldn't hold itkuch longer as hostage

that is so what does it tell you about the IQ level of the Pakistani army generals who think they can defend East Pakistan against India ?
So you expect them to not give a fight? Sorry but we are not Indians.
 
.
Yeah, but its hardly a marriage made in heaven.

The couple are polar opposites

Chinese are irreligious - Pakistanis love their religion more than anything else

Chinese are calculating and difficult to provoke - Pakistanis are emotional, passionate and live in a constant state of provocation

Chinese want to modernize and westernize - Pakistanis place high value on traditional customs way of life

Chinese are business men - Pakistanis can't spell business and have no use for ROI

Chinese tend to be understated and introverted - Pakistanis live for high volume drama and larger than life gestures


....as I said ....enough time.....enough rope.....
ohh and you forgot to add India will be super power by 2020
 
.
I know you not very intelligent and I shouldn't expect anything better this time.
I only object the wrong attribute you give to fall of Dhaka to your cowars hyena forces when they fought us. India had zero role to play. It only struck when we were at weakest and is proud shamefully.
The fall of Dhaka was becvuas of our policies. We couldn't hold itkuch longer as hostage

You expect me to believe what you said. PA could saved the trouble by negotiating with Awami League in March.
Even in November Pakistani army could forstalled Indian attack by pulling out.

If India had not attacked in December 1971 there is a tiny possibility Pakistani army might be in East Pakistan even today
 
.
Is it hard for you to comprehend ?
Indian army ended the military operations in 2 weeks with help from Mukti Bahini.
Mukti Bahini fought Pakistani army for 8 months with no territory to show for.


If that is so what does it tell you about the IQ level of the Pakistani army generals who think they can defend East Pakistan against India ?



There is nothing in common between Pakistanis and British
You should quit being hypocrite and get out of UK
Practise what you preach
You expect me to believe what you said. PA could saved the trouble by negotiating with Awami League in March.
Even in November Pakistani army could forstalled Indian attack by pulling out.

If India had not attacked in December 1971 there is a tiny possibility Pakistani army might be in East Pakistan even today



No they would not have. Involvement by india or not. The creation of Bangladesh was as inevitable as the creation of Pakistan. The reality is that the fundamental racial differences between Pakistanis and indians/bengalis can NEVER be bridged. What would have probably naturally happened by 1991 was hasten to occur 20 years earlier. That's all.
 
.
No they would not have. Involvement by india or not. The creation of Bangladesh was as inevitable as the creation of Pakistan. The reality is that the fundamental racial differences between Pakistanis and indians/bengalis can NEVER be bridged. What would have probably naturally happened by 1991 was hasten to occur 20 years earlier. That's all.
As a dumb idiot he thinks the creation of BD was result of ganga involvement

You expect me to believe what you said. PA could saved the trouble by negotiating with Awami League
You're far too dimwit than I thought
 
.
We dont have to. China will distance itself after few years just like US did.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom