Britons afraid to challenge radical Islam, says former Obama adviser

[Safriz]

Trying to intimidate Britons is futile...
These people dont protest against anything..
Stiff upper lip..

Plus lets see for how long and to where this USA lead war against Islam goes....

 

[fallstuff]

y? because he opposed segregation of men and women?

what wrong did he say? islamic radicalism is the biggest threat for not only britain but also the whole world...

None of the above.

1) Krauss is a lightning rod of intolerance, pretty controversial character for those who know him.

2) This guy propagates his values just like any religious fundamentalist.


3) He is opposing something that was a complete lawful act. They did not break any statues, the school itself does not endorse segregation.


4) The discussion has nothing to do with radicalism. Its your ill attempt to inject into the debate.

5) Hindu majority Indians do not allow minority to slaughter their cows on one of their holiest day.


P.S

These Muslim guys invited this guy to a discussion titled, " "Islam or Atheism: Which Makes More Sense?"

 

[livingdead]

The fact is that if you come across a radical Muslim in the UK, chances are he is born and bred in the UK itself and is a British citizen. Most immigrants to UK come from poorer countries and knowing the conditions back in their country relative to UK, they assimilate easily to British way of life. Problem is with Muslims who grow up in the UK - often they are couch potatoes who are easily seduced by Jihadist and Islamist propaganda disseminated in many mosques and certain radical websites.

It's true. Very few people who have immigrated from subcontinent recently are jhadi. Its the british born and brought up muslims who are rediscovering islam. Also the white converts. Some of them even disown their own parents (they are too liberal and deviant from true path).

 

[Solomon2]

The professor, a leading physicist and prominent atheist, threatened to walk out unless organisers agreed to let men and women sit together, which was eventually agreed - but was then astonished to find himself being accused of intolerance by angry members of the audience.

The "intolerance" the Professor is being accused of is failing to accept the intolerance of others. Had this happened in a mosque that might be understandable but in the supposedly open atmosphere of a British university it is not.

By contrast, for many Orthodox Jews men and women pray separately yet for a secular event like this mixed seating is the norm.

 

[chacha kashmiri]

The "intolerance" the Professor is being accused of is failing to accept the intolerance of others. Had this happened in a mosque that might be understandable but in the supposedly open atmosphere of a British university it is not.

By contrast, for many Orthodox Jews men and women pray separately yet for a secular event like this mixed seating is the norm.

There was no enforced segregation, there was a seating area for those who wanted to sit closely with people of the other sex


For most people who prefer the option of segregation there is no such option for them unfortunately at most such talks and events which is why sadly alot of people don't attend such events

 

[King Solomon]

None of the above.

1) Krauss is a lightning rod of intolerance, pretty controversial character for those who know him.

2) This guy propagates his values just like any religious fundamentalist.

Vague assertions

3) He is opposing something that was a complete lawful act. They did not break any statues, the school itself does not endorse segregation.

Islamists were also opposing something (mixed seating) which is a completely lawful act.

4) The discussion has nothing to do with radicalism. Its your ill attempt to inject into the debate.

It has. Moderate muslims won't have any problem with mixed seating arrangement. The Koran doesn't tell you to segregate sexes.

These Muslim guys invited this guy to a discussion titled, " "Islam or Atheism: Which Makes More Sense?"

Exactly, now:

1. According to radical Islam, men and women can't sit together.

2. According to Atheism, they can and should sit together.

3. University's policy is not such gender apartheid.

The weighing is in favour of a mixed seating arrangement.

 

[fallstuff]

Vague assertions



Islamists were also opposing something (mixed seating) which is a completely lawful act.



It has. Moderate muslims won't have any problem with mixed seating arrangement. The Koran doesn't tell you to segregate sexes.



Exactly, now:

1. According to radical Islam, men and women can't sit together.

2. According to Atheism, they can and should sit together.

3. University's policy is not such gender apartheid.

The weighing is in favour of a mixed seating arrangement.

I doubt you know anything about this guy. This guy gets up in the morning just to pi*s other people off.


This guy is invited by some Islamic group to speak in a debate. The audience had three choices of sitting arrangement. Men, women, and mixed. These were done to accommodate every possible preference. The idiot Krausse had a problem with that.

The issue of the debate was something totally different than what was reported in the Newspaper.

What kind of radical Muslim people will invite this guy ? You have a brain, right ? Use it.

 

[Cyberian]

Salaam to all the Muslims,



Someone should've thrown a shoe at the adviser for telling the Muslim men and women where to sit and stand.

Salaam to all the Muslims.