What's new

British Archives: Israel can nuke all Arabs

I agree. It's just a matter of time till we test ours. (Israel is widely believed to have an ICBM, North Korea and Pakistan are the only nuclear armed-nations that don't have ICBMS currently).

Pakistan doesn't need ICBM at the moment.
 
. .
I think we quite do, and I believe it's already in our arsenal, untested and waiting.

Look, one, two or even 10 ICBMs would only act as a marginal deterrence. If you don't have high-yield nukes with MIRV-based ICBM, they would not add any marginal deterrence.

Instead, what pakistan needs to do is to concentrate on governance and economy. This will ony invite sanctions and scorn from international community
 
.
Look, one, two or even 10 ICBMs would only act as a marginal deterrence. If you don't have high-yield nukes with MIRV-based ICBM, they would not add any marginal deterrence.

Instead, what pakistan needs to do is to concentrate on governance and economy. This will ony invite sanctions and scorn from international community

Yes, invoking an ICBM will give us a tremendously horrible response and hinder our already weak and fragile economy.
 
.
Yes, invoking an ICBM will give us a tremendously horrible response and hinder our already weak and fragile economy.

Unfortunately, india is non-muslim and is allowed to have nukes. No muslim country can ever be allowed to have nukes according to their dictionary.:rolleyes:
 
.
Unfortunately, india is non-muslim and is allowed to have nukes. No muslim country can ever be allowed to have nukes according to their dictionary.:rolleyes:

Turkey has around 90 B-61 Thermo Nuclear bombs. 40 of which are designated to be flown with Turkish aircraft.


800px-b-61_bomb_rack.jpg
 
.
Turkey has around 90 B-61 Thermo Nuclear bombs. 40 of which are designated to be flown with Turkish aircraft

That's true but they are under NATO nuclear weapon sharing agreement. Their launch codes and everything are under US control.

In turkey's case it is purely used as a buffer against Russia. Because russia would target turkey first in any conflict.
 
.
That's true but they are under NATO nuclear weapon sharing agreement. Their launch codes and everything are under US control.

In turkey's case it is purely used as a buffer against Russia. Because russia would target turkey first in any conflict.

That is true about control, but Turkey is still trusted enough to posses and fly them to target. This shows it has nothing to do about being muslim.
 
.
That is true about control, but Turkey is still trusted enough to posses and fly them to target. This shows it has nothing to do about being muslim.

Come on, those weapons are only to be used in war time. And in all probabilities, only situation in which such use would be granted is a major war, perhaps where Russia or China is involved, in which case whether Turkey is "trusted" or not would not make any difference because Turkey's survival itself would be jeopardised in the first place.

This is not the same as possessing nuclear weapons. Rather its like using Turkey as a buffer in case of any major conflict.
 
.
That is true about control, but Turkey is still trusted enough to posses and fly them to target. This shows it has nothing to do about being muslim.

Turkey is trusted but the code to launch the nukes are not given to Turkey! Now, what kind of trust is that?
 
. .
Unfortunately, india is non-muslim and is allowed to have nukes. No muslim country can ever be allowed to have nukes according to their dictionary.:rolleyes:

Don't spout BS please.

Actually India is a sovereign country and there is no one who "allows" us or "dis-allows" us to do anything. The world sanctioned us as much as Pakistan when we developed nukes. Infact Ronald Reagan turned a blind eye to Pakistani nuke program in the 80s. I guess Pak was a Muslim country even then.

Do you know why an organization called NSG came into being ? To stop India from getting any nuclear technology, even civil.

But 1/6th of humanity can't be stopped, no matter who wishes.

Stop this wallowing in self-pity of the whole world conspiring against the pious Muslims for everything. The Islamic countries themselves pushed themselves into a corner and not anyone else. In Pakistan's case it was the horrible proliferation record that proved to be its undoing.
 
.
Unfortunately, india is non-muslim and is allowed to have nukes. No muslim country can ever be allowed to have nukes according to their dictionary.:rolleyes:

I thought that Pakistan is a muslim country and also posses nuclear bomb.

BTW, whats the need of dragging India.
 
.
Unfortunately, india is non-muslim and is allowed to have nukes. No muslim country can ever be allowed to have nukes according to their dictionary.:rolleyes:

CIA had an eye over Pakistani nuclear program all over the 80s and 90s and yet allowed it to continue in return for Pakistan support in the Soviet-Afghan war.

viewer



viewer
 
.
Turkey is trusted but the code to launch the nukes are not given to Turkey! Now, what kind of trust is that?

Other European members (Belgium, Germany, Italy, Netherlands) that have NATO nukes supplied by the US don't have the codes as well.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom