What's new

Breaking: US Navy destroyer intercepts multiple missiles off the coast of Yemen

US will ALWAYS choose Israel.

US will be close to Israel and Myanmar Rohingya Muslim and Chechnyan Muslims.

China will be close to Myanmar junta.

Russia will be close to Mali junta.

Israel will be close to the Azerbaijani Muslims.

Iran will be close to the Armenian people.

Your brain is very simplistic.
 
I doubt this news, USA A$$'s is itching to bomb Middle East again so I won't be surprised if they are using such BS news for build up and suddenly a Ship got hit and USA is now fully in the war, honestly USA Govt/Media and Establishment has proven to be biggest liars on earth, I mean they surpass India/Israel/Russia/China combined when it comes to lies and fabricating stuff which later on debunked through declassified docs.
 
View attachment 963573

My apologies, 900 vertical launch cells, but then you add in ESSM and RAM launchers, EW, and decoy defenses. And it’s highly likely an SSGN is in the Med with 154 Tomahawk missile capacity.

And by region, I mean in defense of Israel. And the Eisenhower group will be arriving in region soon.

But according to some of the chest thumping armchair generals here, those two battle groups are very primitive, and not are not able to do anything
 
US will be close to Israel and Myanmar Rohingya Muslim and Chechnyan Muslims.

China will be close to Myanmar junta.

Russia will be close to Mali junta.

Israel will be close to the Azerbaijani Muslims.

Iran will be close to the Armenian people.

Your brain is very simplistic.

LMAO! You certainly have no idea what you are talking about. When did US brought carrier strike groups to protect Rohingya Muslim? US giving 10 billions dollars worth of weapons to already powerful Israel right now, brought full load of 2 aircraft carriers and you have audacity to compare it with Rohingya or chechans which US wanted only to use.

US never wants to use Israel against any other country. Protection of Israel is in US constitution. Extremely powerful lobby in US ensures that Israel is given protection & priority over even America's own interests.

Your other examples are hillarious too. Nothing remotely compares the relationship of US & Israel.

You put entire Islamic block of countries at one side and put Israel at other side and ask US to choose a side. US will 100% pick Israel. That's as clear as anything.
 
Solution:
There is no short term solution, but in the long term the key countries in middle east need to shift their total dependence on the US and shift to China/Russia. I see some small improvements already, KSA warming up relations with Russia and China. UAE bought light attack / trainer aircrafts from China, Not sure but any of the countries bought Chinese drones as well However, this process needs to step up, Islamic block needs to understand that when it comes to Israel Versus any islamic country, US will ALWAYS choose Israel. It has forever supported it with billions in cash and weapons and it will KEEP supporting it FOREVER.
Many countries are trying to diversify their economic models - a step in the right direction. But absolute boycott of American economy is unrealistic proposition. Russian economy is too small and Chinese economy is relatively closed in comparison to American economy. There is also the issue of demand of your goods - where you can sell your goods? Does China need your goods when it itself is a manufacturing giant?

Growth is not possible by picking a side for another country.
Growth is possible by having bilateral relationship with as many countries as possible.

US support Israel but there is a limit to its support for Israel.
US have supported select Islamic countries as well.
- US supported Afghanistan and Pakistan when both were up against Soviet Union in the 1980s.
- US supported Iraq when it was up against Iran in the 1980s.
- US supported GCC and liberated Kuwait from Iraq in 1991.
- US accepted independence of Bosnia from Yugoslavia.
- US made it possible for Saudi Arabia to blunt attacks of Yemen in war.
- US have tensions with Turkey but have removed it from NATO.

OIC should put pressure on US to address Palestine - Israel conflict of-course. Pakistan can play a role to this effect as well.

But it is a mistake to assume that US will not try to influence and shape global events. US will check Russian and Chinese moves wherever possible and will attack those who will try to appease these two powers a bit much. Regional powers need to play their cards sensibly and calculatingly.

Islamic countries have inter-country rivalries as well. Some are trying to impose themselves on others. This is why some seek foreign assistance to protect their interests.

Islamic countries should learn how to co-exist peacefully and support each other in productive ways. Develop local economies, develop an Islamic economic system, and strengthen OIC. These developments can of much help to Islamic countries in the long term.
 
Many countries are trying to diversify their economic models - a step in the right direction. But absolute boycott of American economy is unrealistic proposition. Russian economy is too small and Chinese economy is relatively closed in comparison to American economy. There is also the issue of demand of your goods - where you can sell your goods? Does China need your goods when it itself is a manufacturing giant?

Agree, I never said 'absolute boycott'. I am just against total dependence. All eggs cannot be in the same basket. Why US used to twist anyone's arm was because it had all the cards all the time. That's changing slowly.

US supported Afghanistan and Pakistan when both were up against Soviet Union in the 1980s.
- US supported Iraq when it was up against Iran in the 1980s.
- US supported GCC and liberated Kuwait from Iraq in 1991.
- US accepted independence of Bosnia from Yugoslavia.
- US made it possible for Saudi Arabia to blunt attacks of Yemen in war.
- US have tensions with Turkey but have removed it from NATO.

Disagree, In most cases (except only Bosnia) US did it purely for their own game, their own purpose, their own design.

No one would have benefited more than US in its any of wars against the Soviets. They were two competing super powers. A whole massive cold war was going on. US didn't helped Pakistan, it helped itself and used a proxy war to get rid of Soviet union its biggest challenger.

Similarly, US had its own political objectives in Kuwait war,

US needs Turkey. IF US had no threat of China / Russia block, US would have discarded Turkey by now. Turkey has largest standing army at doorsteps of Europe. Imagine, if Turkey becomes ally of Russia & China it would be the most massive blow to West & NATO. Its in interest of US & West that Turkey remains on their side.
 
Agree, I never said 'absolute boycott'. I am just against total dependence. All eggs cannot be in the same basket. Why US used to twist anyone's arm was because it had all the cards all the time. That's changing slowly.



Disagree, In most cases (except only Bosnia) US did it purely for their own game, their own purpose, their own design.

No one would have benefited more than US in its any of wars against the Soviets. They were two competing super powers. A whole massive cold war was going on. US didn't helped Pakistan, it helped itself and used a proxy war to get rid of Soviet union its biggest challenger.

Similarly, US had its own political objectives in Kuwait war,

US needs Turkey. IF US had no threat of China / Russia block, US would have discarded Turkey by now. Turkey has largest standing army at doorsteps of Europe. Imagine, if Turkey becomes ally of Russia & China it would be the most massive blow to West & NATO. Its in interest of US & West that Turkey remains on their side.
Of-course, I have always stated to not put all eggs in one basket. This is good for any country.

Disagree, In most cases (except only Bosnia) US did it purely for their own game, their own purpose, their own design.

No one would have benefited more than US in its any of wars against the Soviets. They were two competing super powers. A whole massive cold war was going on. US didn't helped Pakistan, it helped itself and used a proxy war to get rid of Soviet union its biggest challenger.

Similarly, US had its own political objectives in Kuwait war,

US needs Turkey. IF US had no threat of China / Russia block, US would have discarded Turkey by now. Turkey has largest standing army at doorsteps of Europe. Imagine, if Turkey becomes ally of Russia & China it would be the most massive blow to West & NATO. Its in interest of US & West that Turkey remains on their side.
Of-course, American interests were involved in these developments. You can say that these were mutually beneficial decisions for the countries involved. This is how it is.

Let's say that many countries find US useful in some way or form. Russia and/or China cannot do anything and everything for all countries out there. Russia have its interests. China have its interests. US have its interests. For another country, it is a matter of which of these big powers will support on a certain matter. This is how it is.

Another big power might emerge tomorrow and different countries will find a way to court it.

Just pointing out the obvious.

The world should move in the direction of cooperation and prosperity instead of fighting war all the time. I wonder when.
 
assume fake news, if Houthis have missiles of such range, it is very precious, meant to be used wisely, not like this.
 
assume fake news, if Houthis have missiles of such range, it is very precious, meant to be used wisely, not like this.

I don't assume fake news. this is news, whether you disagree with it or not
 
1000 vertical launch cells won't help against hypersonic. Arabs wasted time not going for it last 10 years and now they're countered again.Arabs proves to be dumb yet again and never listen.
 
LMAO! You certainly have no idea what you are talking about. When did US brought carrier strike groups to protect Rohingya Muslim? US giving 10 billions dollars worth of weapons to already powerful Israel right now, brought full load of 2 aircraft carriers and you have audacity to compare it with Rohingya or chechans which US wanted only to use.

US never wants to use Israel against any other country. Protection of Israel is in US constitution. Extremely powerful lobby in US ensures that Israel is given protection & priority over even America's own interests.

Your other examples are hillarious too. Nothing remotely compares the relationship of US & Israel.

You put entire Islamic block of countries at one side and put Israel at other side and ask US to choose a side. US will 100% pick Israel. That's as clear as anything.

Well given current circumstances and the history of past 50 years - one has to agree.

assume fake news, if Houthis have missiles of such range, it is very precious, meant to be used wisely, not like this.

There is no guarantee that "Houthi" and "Wise" can be used in the same sentence.

Would love to be proven wrong though.
 
Back
Top Bottom