Breaking!Secret £14million Bible in which 'Jesus predicts coming of Prophet Muhammad

[graphican]

Ayats are part of the Quranic reformation of Uthman. Unless you mean Uthman is like the deciples of Jesus then the entire number arguments don't make sense.

Prophet Muhammad PBUH in his last address of Haj said you will not get astray as long as you hold the rope of Allah and that is Qruan and Sunnah.

With these words of Prophet SAWW, it is clear that Rasool Allah SAWW is talking about the Qruan which will reach Muslims including you and me and the Qruan that Rasool Allah SAWW mentioned is what you and I have now. There are no two Qurans out there and there are no secret versions which one may think about.

Allah has taken responsibility of Quran and preserving its message upon Himself. I do not see anybody had or can ever have capacity to change a single alphabet of it.

 

[timetravel]

If you want to know if Prophet Muhammad PBUH was a Prophet or not, study Quran. The book (Quran) is still with us and can tell you if this is a message of Lord Almighty or not.

I had a chance to study Gita after talking to an Indian fellow in the forum. Gita is written in a narrative form in which Arjun said something and Krishna replied something. Its a talk and level of wisdom which you get there is more of a sufi-like. I ask non-Muslims to give Quran a read and see is that even a human writing style? If it is not, then think who should be the one to whom this Quran was revealed to.

Quran is not just set of advises, it tells you secrets which are otherwise impossible for us to know. We have found body of Phero in 1980 but Quran is telling you that he was killed and his body was saved for the world to witness and take a lesson from. Quran says river's water stay separate despite they unite in the ocean. There are hundreds of revelations, hundreds of incidents about the past and 100s of incidents about the future and on top of that, it tells you what Allah expects you to do with each other and with Him. Put Quran to any test you like and then see if it is a book of Lord or not and if it is, then Prophet Muhammad PBUH is the Prophet to whom it was revealed to.

If you are looking for philosophy you look to one book.
If you are looking for a rule book you look at another.

If you are talking about all humans you look at one book.
If you are talking about two different categories of humans - followers/Non followers you look at another book.

if you need to know what is life, you look at one book.
If you need to know what to drink, how to dress you look at another book.

if you want broader vision of life you look at one book.
if you want narrow vision of life you look at another book.

One book tells you all religions/all people are equal.
One book tells you how its followers will go to heaven, while other humans will go to hell.

now you decide which book tells what. And you decide which book reflects great philosophy and which book reflects typical human behavior.

 

[I.R.A]

Great sir i agree with you , we are so much mixed up , but you know there is something that i read in the history of books if you can confirm that , that even christian first told Prophet Muhammad that you are going to be the prophet so it is linked to it ??

I think we (Muslisms) are messed up because we assume that we hold copyrights for Islam, we (Muslims) are the only ones who own Islam and no one else knows Islam better than us. We forget that Islam is for whole of the humanity and it does not need anyone to represent it what so ever. There is a reason Prophet (Peace be upon Him) is also known as “Rehmat Ul Lil Alimeen”, And even names of ALLAH don't suggest anything limited to Muslims, Like Al-Rehman, Al-Rahim, Al-Ghafoor, Al-Qahar. So first we need to stop worrying about Islam’s existence without us, it is not going anywhere it will stay till ALLAH decides otherwise, we (Muslims) need to start worrying about ourselves what we (Muslims) have done to prove that we understand and practice Islam.

 

[Rakan.SA]

must hear this very very interesting

 

[Srinivas]

Kalki avatar and Jesus returning to earth as a warrior has similarity in description.

 

[I.R.A]

It was Warqa bin Nawfal, cousin of Khadijah (wife of Mohammed (PBUH)) who said that. Warqa bin Nawfal was not a Christian but had the knowledge of the Bible. Based on his his knowledge of the Bible, and mention of a Messiah in the Bible, he said it was Mohammed (PBUH) who was the promised Messiah.

Sir I recall during childhood of Prophet (PBUH), while he was once traveling with his Uncle Abu Talib, a christian priest verified the seal of Prophet hood. If I exactly recall.

@HughSlaman @DRAY thought this thread might interest you people.

 

[500]

Gospel of Barnabas is not secret, its well known silly fake:

Gospel of Barnabas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[I.R.A]

Yes I heard of the Dajjal but Kalki is to rid the evil in the end times. What about the Mehdi? what do people think of his return?

Mehdi A.S is not returning he will be born for the first time and will die like normal humans.

Regarding your concept of Kalki I personally feel it more resembling to resurrection of Jesus A.S. (Its my personal view).

Otherwise when the Dajjal comes I fail to understand what will happen to Hindu Faith (in our perspective of end of times). If you look at it that way that the faithful who believe there is someone who is going to come and rid world of the sins and filth, then those faithful are bound to accept and follow religion of that evil destroyer. This is where it matters most because according to our belief religion of Jesus A.S at that time would be Islam as preached and practiced by Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). So you can interpret that Jesus A.S is the Kalki you are waiting for. But GOD is all knowing and he knows best about this too.

 

[thesolar65]

I think this a fabrication to make this bible dated back 1500 yrs ago that authenticated Jesus prediction of Mohamed to be a prophet speak in tongue by spreading god message. Out of 30 billions people since the invention of god, only a handful blessed to be the messenger of god. Shit don't add up with reasoning.

Some body is trolling gullible people!!

 

[Guynextdoor2]

This is probably not genuine. Too accurate to be true.

 

[syedali73]

Gospel of Barnabas is not secret, its well known silly fake:

Gospel of Barnabas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Silly fake?

Which gospel is not fake? Is there any gospel in existence that was hand-written by Jesus himself or any of his 12 disciples? And if these gospels are not fake, what makes Gospel of Barnabas fake? Because it has little resemblance with Quranic versus on Jesus? Still the Gospel of Barnabas is some 15 hundred years old, written down before the establishment of Islam. Whoever faked (if at all) the Gospel certainly had no intention to support the prophethood of Muhammed (PBUH) at-least. I have yet to see an official statement from the Vatican on the Gospel of Barnabas as being a 'silly fake'.

 

[firestorm77]

Silly fake?

Which gospel is not fake? Is there any gospel in existence that was hand-written by Jesus himself or any of his 12 disciples? And if these gospels are not fake, what makes Gospel of Barnabas fake? Because it has little resemblance with Quranic versus on Jesus? Still the Gospel of Barnabas is some 15 hundred years old, written down before the establishment of Islam. Whoever faked (if at all) the Gospel certainly had no intention to support the prophethood of Muhammed (PBUH) at-least.

Both the Old Testament and the New Testament were compiled long after Moses and Jesus' time. The Council of Jamnia was the first ecumenical one to decide for the Jewish people as what should the Bible be made up off and the Council of Trent for Catholics and then subsequently Protestants would revise the creed in the Council of Trent regarding scripture. Even today the question of canon get's asked with regards to such books as 2 Peter and Hebrews as to whether they should be revised from the canon.

 

[500]

Silly fake?

Which gospel is not fake? Is there any gospel in existence that was hand-written by Jesus himself or any of his 12 disciples? And if these gospels are not fake, what makes Gospel of Barnabas fake? Because it has little resemblance with Quranic versus on Jesus? Still the Gospel of Barnabas is some 15 hundred years old, written down before the establishment of Islam. Whoever faked (if at all) the Gospel certainly had no intention to support the prophethood of Muhammed (PBUH) at-least. I have yet to see an official statement from the Vatican on the Gospel of Barnabas as being a 'silly fake'.

Classic Gospels were written in 1st century Judea. Gospel of Barnabas is written in Middle Ages by someone who never was in Judea.

 

[syedali73]

Classic Gospels were written in 1st century Judea. Gospel of Barnabas is written in Middle Ages by someone who never was in Judea.

This particular book is the one that survived, and it says nowhere that this particular book was the 1st edition. Maybe earlier editions were written on parchments, or other fragile materials that did not survive or if they did, are not discovered yet. Book writing was an expensive and hugely time -consuming undertaking back in those days when printing press did not exist. It does not make sense why would some scribe fake a book let alone the Bible. We can say it is a different version of Bible but cant declare it fake unless it was done in past few hundred years.

 

[500]

This particular book is the one that survived, and it says nowhere that this particular book was the 1st edition. Maybe earlier editions were written on parchments, or other fragile materials that did not survive or if they did, are not discovered yet. Book writing was an expensive and hugely time -consuming undertaking back in those days when printing press did not exist. It does not make sense why would some scribe fake a book let alone the Bible. We can say it is a different version of Bible but cant declare it fake unless it was done in past few hundred years.

Its not matter of surviving but matter of text. Person who wrote it obviously lived in middle ages and was not familiar with Judea and Jewish costumes.

Gospel of Barnabas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia