Breaking News : Aksai chin is illegally occupied by China and violating borders peace:Rajnath Singh

[INDIC]

India is a Area,
Geographical concept, not a country

Even my bedroom is a geographic area and you are also a living thing.

 

[AMCA]

India is a Area,
Geographical concept, not a country

Geographical Concept?? lol.. you Mr. DicLong have no Idea what you just said.

 

[Fattyacids]

You are wrong, India is more ancient than China. Our presence in Mansarovar and Kailash as old as our Indian civilization at the time of Vedas were being composed, Qing Empire brought you there on historical Indian land, otherwise Chinese have no presence outside of Great Wall of China.

Repeating your lie and propaganda again.

1) Chinese civilization is older than Vedic civilization (There's no such academic term as Indian civilization)

2) It was British empire that created India, thus gifted you Aksai Chin and 7 sisters states

3) Great Wall is a series of interlink fortification, it is not a border. Chinese empire extend well beyond the wall. (And there's no wall on western side-- Aksai Chin)

 

[INDIC]

Repeating your lie and propaganda again.

1) Chinese civilization is older than Vedic civilization (There's no such academic term as Indian civilization)

2) It was British empire that created India, thus gifted you Aksai Chin and 7 sisters states

3) Great Wall is a series of interlink fortification, it is not a border. Chinese empire extend well beyond the wall.

View attachment 154867

Sorry, Indian civilization is older than Chinese, even 1000 years back half of your country recognized themselves as non-Hans. Compared to that people in Bharatavarsha(land between the mountains of North and ocean of the South) recognized themselves as people of Bharat.

 

[Fattyacids]

Sorry, Indian civilization is older than Chinese, even 1000 years back half of your country recognized themselves as non-Hans. Compared to that people in Bharatavarsha(land between the mountains of North and ocean of the South) recognized themselves as people of Bharat.

There's no such term as Indian civilization, only Vedic civilization started by vedic aryan 3500 years ago. Chinese civilization is older by almost a millennium and it is indigenous. Han Chinese, Huaxia, Hanren....are same people, same ethnicity; different name denotes different era. Bharat is a mythological kingdom never existed. There's no bharat ethnicity, "Indian" is also not an ethnicity. You're all different people.

 

[INDIC]

There's no such term as Indian civilization, only Vedic civilization started by vedic aryan 3500 years ago. Chinese civilization is older by almost a millennium and it is indigenous. Han Chinese, Huaxia, Hanren....are same people, same ethnicity; different name denotes different era. Bharat is a mythological kingdom never existed. There's no bharat ethnicity, "Indian" is also not an ethnicity. You're all different people.

There is no Chinese civilization too. now,get your candy. Bharat is better name instead tracing your identity to some pervert Emperor like Qin Shi Huang. Half of your country was non-Han thousand years back, you lecturing me about Indian history.

Bharat is based on mythology but mandate of heaven is not a mythology, what a skyrocketing high IQ.

 

[Fattyacids]

There is no Chinese civilization too. now,get your candy. Bharat is better name instead tracing your identity to some pervert Emperor like Qin Shi Huang. Half of your country was non-Han thousand years back, you lecturing me about Indian history.

Bharat is based on mythology but mandate of heaven is not a mythology, what a skyrocketing high IQ.

Do not attempt to draw a dumb parallel, there's none. "Chinese civilization" is a proper academic term. And for the obvious reason: Han Chinese ethnicity. There's no Indian civilization, much less "Indian" as an ethnicity.

Do not equate philosophical concept with tangible objects, don't dumb argument. Mandate of Heaven is a political-philosophical concept, like British's "Divine Rights to rule." There is no real or unreal philosophy, if that philosophical concept existed, it is real.

A tangible mythological object that never existed in real life, like a Greek's Atlantis or your Bharat, never existed in real life. Period.

 

[INDIC]

Do not attempt to draw a dumb parallel, there's none. "Chinese civilization" is a proper academic term. And for the obvious reason: Han Chinese ethnicity. There's no Indian civilization, much less "Indian" as an ethnicity.

Do not equate philosophical concept with tangible objects, don't dumb argument. Mandate of Heaven is a political-philosophical concept, like British's "Divine Rights to rule." There is no real or unreal philosophy, if that philosophical concept existed, it is real.
A tangible mythological object that never existed in real life, like Greek's Atlantis or your Bharat, never existed in real life.

Europeans, Persians and Arabs knew about India and we had an idea of Bharatavarsha centuries before that Qin Shi Huang gave you the Chinese identity in small portion of China.

Bharatavarsha is the name of the landmass of Indian civilization which we named in respect of our Patriarch Emperor Bharata and beyond that was land of foreign races on the other side of Khyber pass. While half of your population even didn't call themselves as Han Chinese(but cooked and uncooked barbarians) even thousand years back.

Tell me using your high IQ, how Mandate of heaven is not a mythology but naming our homeland on the name of our Patriarch is a mythology. Atlantis sounds like a mythology that some Chinese emperor had a mandate of Heaven.

 

[farhan_9909]

Rajnath should rather be worried about loosing Rajhastan and IOK to India and Arunchunal/assam to China instead of aksai chin

 

[INDIC]

Rajnath should rather be worried about loosing Rajhastan and IOK to India and Arunchunal/assam to China instead of aksai chin

Pakistan should care about current crisis in west of Indus river i.e. TTP and BLA problem.

 

[Albatross]

This relatively recent map explains very well the fully expanded boundaries of Hindu dominated areas and its evident they has nothing to do with Himalayas, kashmir, aksai chin etc.

If we go back a few thousands year's Hindu dominant areas size goes down drastically restricted to a few north eastern districts. South Indians who came from Africa came even later.

Indus valley civilization was older , advanced , bigger than any so called Indian/Vedic era and they had nothing to do with hinduism.

 

[Fattyacids]

Europeans, Persians and Arabs knew about India and we had an idea of Bharatavarsha centuries before that Qin Shi Huang gave you the Chinese identity in small portion of China.

Bharatavarsha is the name of the landmass of Indian civilization which we named in respect of our Patriarch Emperor Bharata and beyond that was land of foreign races on the other side of Khyber pass. While half of your population even didn't call themselves as Han Chinese(but cooked and uncooked barbarians) even thousand years back.

Tell me using your high IQ, how Mandate of heaven is not a mythology but naming our homeland on the name of our Patriarch is a mythology. Atlantis sounds like a mythology that some Chinese emperor had a mandate of Heaven.

They refer to India as a subcontinent by the Indus river, not as a kingdom. Qin Shi Huang created a centralized empire, Chinese identity goes back further. His Qin state is almost half the size of present day India.

Just because there's no kingdom/country called Bharat, distorting Chinese history isn't going to change anything. In southern most region which includes Vietnam, part of Chinese empire then, there're many minority groups. Half population of china? Don't insult your own IQ.

I educated you on the dif between philosophy and mythical object. Don't do a dumb and dumber.

 

[BuddhaPalm]

Indians are utterly humiliated after Chumar retreat by Indian Army so they must delude themselves to block out the humiliation.

 

[chairborne ranger]

Nothing new in this. We claim aksai chin. They claim arunachal.. We dont give up one claim without them giving up the other.

 

[INDIC]

They all refer India as a subcontinent by the Indus river, not as a kingdom or ethnicity. Qin Shi Huang created a centralized empire, Chinese identity and de-centralised Chinese states goes back further. Even his Qin state is almost half the size of present day India, learn how map is scaled to size.

Mythological Bharatavarsha and Emperor Bharat never existed there's no empire and ethnicity called Bharat or Indian, distorting Chinese history isn't going to change anything. In southern most region which includes Vietnam, part of Chinese empire then, there're many minority groups. Half population? Don't insult your own IQ.

Read my post above, I educated you on the difference between philosophical concept and a tangible mythical object. Don't do a dumb and dumber.

Yes, Mandate of Heaven is not a fairy tale on which you trace your Chinese identity, your skyrocketing high IQ made me feel inferior.

Did I tell you Bharatavarsha means the land between the mountains of North(Himalayas) and seas of the South(Indian ocean, Arabian sea and Bay of Bengal) where our Indian civilization flourished and traced us as people of Bharatavarsha and we have used it since ancient times to modern times, we have a cultural basis of our identity and don't need some Pervert Emperor like Qin Shi Huang to claim it. Bharat was our historical homeland/country, our people never heard of the term subcontinent, geographic expression only high IQ Chinese knew it.

The Qin or Han Empire looks some 20% of modern China, united China. LOL No united China existed before 1950, even ROC never had a united China.