What's new

Birth of a nation

DelhiDareDevil

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 12, 2011
Messages
2,242
Reaction score
0
Four days before the end of the Bangladesh war, on Sunday, December 12, 1971, a group of Pakistani officers came together at Dhaka’s presidential residence. They knew they were about to lose the war: Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi had intervened on Bangladesh’s behalf, and the Indian army was advancing on the capital.

Deciding to hobble the nation they could no longer prevent, the officers put together the names of 250 people to be arrested and killed: journalists, artists, doctors, and university professors. The arrests were made on Monday and Tuesday by marked bands of extreme right-wing collaborators belonging to an organisation called Al-Badr Razakar.

Then, on the evening of December 14, hours before the official surrender was signed, the victims were taken in groups to the outskirts of the city, where they were executed.

My grandfather, once a prominent political dissident, was in his 70s by then, and had already spent almost a decade of his life in Pakistani jails. Upon hearing of the arrests, he went into hiding, and escaped. But hundreds of other intellectuals were not so lucky.

They were shot into a mass grave in a place called Rayerbazaar, only discovered a few days after independence.

Photographs and newsreels of that time show the families of the victims standing around a wide ditch, staring in disbelief at the bodies strewn within.

During those nine months in 1971, the world watched while the Pakistani army conducted a campaign of mass murder, rape and ethnic cleansing against an unarmed civilian population. In the name of religious unity, they killed up to 3 million people, displaced another 10 million into India, and are alleged to have raped hundreds of thousands of women.

This year marks the 40th anniversary of the independence of Bangladesh, and the country has come a long way. Born out of that brutal war of secession, battered by floods, cyclones, coups and political assassinations, it was once a country that had little chance of surviving. Against all odds, Bangladesh has not only survived, but flourished.

It’s gone from an aid-dependent country to one that has enjoyed 5-6 % growth over the last three years. It has a vibrant women’s movement, a functioning democracy, a free press, and a track record of investing in health and education. You only have to visit Dhaka to get a sense of the pace of change and transformation.

The indisputable heroes of Bangladesh are its farmers. Though the population has doubled in the last 40 years, the agricultural sector has been able to keep up, and through one natural disaster after another, the farmers have produced crop after bumper crop.

Also crucial to Bangladesh’s success are the men and women who have left the country to seek their fortunes abroad. They send home approximately $ 10 billion a year, outstripping all other contributions to the country’s GDP. Add to that the success of the readymade garment industry, and you can explain the glossy shopping malls and boutiques that have sprouted all over the cities.

Progress and stability were hard won. The first decade of the country saw a series of unstable governments and the murders of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and General Ziaur Rahman, two of its best known and beloved politicians.

Their deaths were followed by the nine-year dictatorship of Hossain Mohammad Ershad, appearing to confirm the suspicion that democracy could not flourish in a country with so many other problems. But in 1990, a popular movement not unlike the ones we are witnessing in West Asia today ousted Ershad. Democracy was restored, and there have been four successful parliamentary elections in the last two decades.

In 2008, the Awami League, led by Sheikh Mujib’s daughter Sheikh Hasina, won a landslide electoral victory. The party campaigned on a platform of secularism and progressive politics, reversing decades of political pandering to far right groups. Last year, the Supreme Court restored Bangladesh to its status as a secular republic.

Soon thereafter, the high court declared that fatwas were illegal. Harkatul Jihad, the terrorist organisation that had been behind a spate of suicide bombings in 2005, was outlawed.

But most importantly, after waiting for four long decades, the victims of the 1971 genocide are finally getting justice. Last year, an international war crimes tribunal was set up, and prosecutors have begun collecting evidence of rapes, killings and arson in preparation for war crimes trials expected to take place later this year.

Arrest warrants have been issued against five members of far right Islamist party, Jamaat-e-Islami, which is accused of siding with the Pakistani army during the war.

Pakistan has never officially apologised to Bangladesh, and the 1974 Delhi treaty has prevented Bangladesh from charging the soldiers and officers responsible for orchestrating the genocide. But their local collaborators, including the ones who participated in the killing of intellectuals on December 14, have thus far been free to remain citizens of Bangladesh, to run for office, and, in some cases, to brag about their past as razakars.

With the tribunal, this culture of impunity may finally come to an end. In dealing with the deep wounds of the past, Bangladesh may find a way forward as a progressive, secular nation.


Tahmima Anam is the author of

A Golden Age and her novel The Good Muslim will be published by Penguin Books India in May
The views expressed by the author are personal



Birth of a nation - Hindustan Times


Like to say early congratulations to Bangladesh for being 40 years old this year.
 
.
Really good to read, congrats to all Bangladeshis on all their recent achievements, making the country secular, 5-6% growth etc.
 
.
WB has forecast a 6.3% growth this year, but the Bank of Bangladesh forecast is a 7% growth.
 
. .
Alright take it easy. He is not trying to downplay your importance.

No, no, I was just stating the facts, nothing else. I understand that not every one knows the current financial data. No hard feeling, please.
 
.
Replying thread was closed just before I wanted to post. So replying here. No reply.


Between The Lines
Pak, Bangla still stand apart
Kuldip Nayar

Visiting Pakistan and Bangladesh within a span of 14 days is like harking back the 40 years when the two countries separated from each other. Why did it happen? How did it happen? Who was responsible for it? Such an exercise can only be of academic distraction. But it is clear that the disputes between the Bengalis in East Pakistan and those living in West Pakistan had become so acute towards the end of the sixties that their parting of ways had become inevitable.



I was at Islamabad in the end of March and at Dhaka in mid-April. What I have seen in both the countries underlines my earlier belief that the two peoples are so different in their thinking and approach that they could not have lived together as one country. Both are proud to be Muslim. Yet, the Islam practiced in Bangladesh is liberal and accommodating. The demagogues are there. But they do not disturb the rhythm of life, which is pluralistic.

Yes, we always enjoyed pluralism, but PK has failed. Bad.

Text books in Bangladesh teach history. They do not distort it or preach enmity as the books in Pakistan do. A Hindu is not considered an enemy in Bangladesh. Even the liberation war 1971 has been told in a historical perspective without chauvinism and vengeful note. Bengali, the national language which was sought to be replaced by Islamabad with Urdu and ultimately led to the secession of East Pakistan, has given birth to a different culture, tethered to Islam but not to parochialism. Urdu does not figure anywhere. Signboards are mostly in English and at very few places in Bangla and English.

Unnecessary point to get score. Why Urdu will be in signboards in BD?

Dance, music and art are galloping freely. They do not have to conform to a particular way or style. It is an art for the sake of art. Rabindranath Tagore is as much popular and loved as Qazi Nazarul Islam, the poet laureate of Bangladesh. Kathak and Odissi, the two types of dance in Bangladesh, are not discouraged because they have the Hindu orientation. Nothing in dance or music is banned so long as they are in realm of art. Women wear no hijab and very few men keep long beards. And there is no law of blasphemy, not even a murmur of demand.

Another unnecessary point to get scores. Pakistanis do not understand Bangla, then why they would like Rabindranath Tagore/ his philosophy?


Dance, music and art are galloping freely. They do not have to conform to a particular way or style. It is an art for the sake of art. Rabindranath Tagore is as much popular and loved as Qazi Nazarul Islam, the poet laureate of Bangladesh. Kathak and Odissi, the two types of dance in Bangladesh, are not discouraged because they have the Hindu orientation. Nothing in dance or music is banned so long as they are in realm of art. Women wear no hijab and very few men keep long beards. And there is no law of blasphemy, not even a murmur of demand.

1. I think Dance, music and art are also galloping freely in non-extremist infected ares in PK, like Lohore, Karachi, Isloo. Even they have separate Fashion and Music TV.
2. Why would Kathak and Odissi, the two types of dance be encouraged in PK?

Pakistan has many liberals. But they are afraid to speak out and be counted. The assassination of Punjab governor Salman Taseer and Cultural Minister Shahbaz Bhatti has muffled the voice of critics. Hafiz Syeed, leader of Lashkar-e-Toiba, talking in terms of jihad against India, makes news. A person like him does not cause even a ripple in Bangladesh. The Jamaat-e-Islami here tries to muddy the water of secularism but without much effect.

Yes that is failure and bad side of PK.

Terrorists have no direct or indirect support from the government, something which I cannot say for certain after my recent visit to Pakistan. But then East Pakistan was always more liberal than West Pakistan and was even considered close to Hindus. A Bangladeshi intellectual explained to me how their separation from Pakistan took away from that society liberalism and the sense of accommodation, leaving the country to wallow in extremism and prejudice.

How GoP is supporting terrorists, since they are doing WoT? If they would support terrorism then terrorists would get modern arms and would be used against India at first, not against own Pakistani people.

Another thing, if LeT is supported by GoP, then that is not terrorism exactly.

Or GoP may support some/few terrorist to get some strategic benefits, for the time being. Like for getting defence help from USA.


Bangladesh founder Sheikh Mujiur Rahman told me in 1972, when I interviewed him at Dhaka: "All along Pakistan has preached four things: one, Islam is in danger; two, the Hindu is kaafir; three, India is the enemy; and four, Kashmir must be conquered. The Pakistanis have been fed on this propaganda for the last many years. The hate campaign unleashed in that country is even against the tenets of Islam. Unless there is a change in the mentality of the people of Pakistan they cannot get out of their make-believe world."

Yes, this is true that a Hindu is a Kaffir, India is enemy of PK, and Kashmir should be conquered. Nothing wrong here. But if PK would think that Islam was in danger in that time, then that was wrong.

Yet I found a streak of sympathy for Pakistan. Many used the word "pity." I believe that an overwhelming majority in Bangladesh feels that the Pakistanis face a situation which requires understanding and help. Bangladesh has neither forgotten not forgiven the atrocities committed against their nationals in 1971. But that does not stop some nostalgically recalling the period when the two lived together. The younger generation is indifferent, like the youth in India towards Pakistan.

Yes, generous Bangladeshis feel pity to the bad situation in PK.

However, the better news for Bangladesh would be free trade. I have never been able to understand why New Delhi drags its feet when it comes to trade with Bangladesh or, for that matter, Pakistan. Duty free trade with them would make little difference to the imports worth billions of dollars. The two countries can gain from the huge market India has. This would create vested interests in Bangladesh and Pakistan.

BD (developing country) is the biggest importer of Indian goods (with many cheap goods) after any developed country in this Earth. Bad. Link: http://www.defence.pk/forums/bangla...vers-northern-region-dying-2.html#post1682714

Sheikh Hasina is anxiously awaiting the visit of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. The signing of Teesta River agreement is expected. But more than that Hasina hopes to shore up her sagging popularity through the agreement and other goodies. I hope she turns out to be correct. But my experience is that India is too squeamish when it comes to dealing with the neighbouring countries. New Delhi is yet to learn the art of diplomacy.

Hasina is a Stooge of India.



Last comment:

Pk is passing bad days now, I think they will be get back in good condition again.
 
.
^^^
This Bharti writer knows nothing about Bangladeshi muslims. He lost all credibiltiy with this half baked fabricated statement. This is certainly not true. Does this Bharti writer know this fact that there are more Masjid in Dhaka then Islamabad and lahore combined.

Women wear no hijab and very few men keep long beards.

Hijab is mendatory(Farz) and beards is Sunnah(recomanded). So is this Bharti trying to say that Bangladeshis are less islamic then Pakistanis.

the Hindu is kaafir

It's a true statement and all muslim will agree. So Pakistanis are definatly not wrong about this conclusion.

He must have wrote this article from either livingroom of some secularist or hotel room. I doubt he has gone around Dhaka or Islamabad. :tdown:
 
.
I dont agree, that Bangladesh should be a secular nation or it was. Where muslims cover upto 90% of its population, secularism is unnecessary here - the islam is our one of major strength.

Its true most of muslims dont keep beard, woman rearly wear hijab that doesn't mean they are secular minded anyhow. Just we are not religiously extremist like our neighbors.
 
.
Unnecessary point to get score. Why Urdu will be in signboards in BD?

Bcz, despite an enemy he acknowledges the fact of Urdu for being a uniting bond to the whole of subcontinental Muslims except Bengalis.
So basically he pays homeage to Bengali Muslims and still feels satisfied that they are the throne in the unity of Muslims in the subcontinent after 37 years of their independence.

Another unnecessary point to get scores. Pakistanis do not understand Bangla, then why they would like Rabindranath Tagore/ his philosophy?

Again he enjoying with the fact that "Iqbal" is not the philosophical head of Bengali Muslims an unique feature of theirs not with stand to other Muslims of the subcontinent.
 
.
^^^
This Bharti writer knows nothing about Bangladeshi muslims. He lost all credibiltiy with this half baked fabricated statement. This is certainly not true. Does this Bharti writer know this fact that there are more Masjid in Dhaka then Islamabad and lahore combined.



Hijab is mendatory(Farz) and beards is Sunnah(recomanded). So is this Bharti trying to say that Bangladeshis are less islamic then Pakistanis.



It's a true statement and all muslim will agree. So Pakistanis are definatly not wrong about this conclusion.

He must have wrote this article from either livingroom of some secularist or hotel room. I doubt he has gone around Dhaka or Islamabad. :tdown:
i won't agree to the statement that
All hindus are kafirs and i am
A muslim.
 
.
Bcz, despite an enemy he acknowledges the fact of Urdu for being a uniting bond to the whole of subcontinental Muslims except Bengalis.
So basically he pays homeage to Bengali Muslims and still feels satisfied that they are the throne in the unity of Muslims in the subcontinent after 37 years of their independence.



Again he enjoying with the fact that "Iqbal" is not the philosophical head of Bengali Muslims an unique feature of theirs not with stand to other Muslims of the subcontinent.

Try forcing Urdu anywhere in South India, they will smack right at your face before you say Ur, least of all Bengalis are accommodating! :lol:

The author doesn't seem to know much about Bengal, Bengalis put their language and heritage on personal high pedestal, it also seemed weird to me that he expected signboards in Urdu and no love for Tagore.

And by the way, Qazi Najrul Islam aint a Bangladeshi poet but an Indian Bengali.
 
.
its a little funny on how a lot of pakistanis as a pakistani condemns the US attitude of "MY way or the Highway" in WoT and then propagates the same attitude of extremist Islamic mentality of ALL non muslims being kafirs..

May be the USA - Afghanistan- Pakistan situation is Allah's way of showing these extremist view holders the fallacy of their ways by putting them on the wrong side of extremism from USA
 
.
The author doesn't seem to know much about Bengal, Bengalis put their language and heritage on personal high pedestal, it also seemed weird to me that he expected signboards in Urdu and no love for Tagore.

Abir…Actually People belongs to the North of the subcontinent including Pakistan and India are historically adversaries to each other for the soul of whole of India throughout history. They see each other in the prism of that battle which is still being fought and played; making scoring points on each other is a norm. This is the only reason for our intense rivalry throughout history.

In selecting Urdu as a National Language of Pakistan, Muslims stamps their will to acquire and replicate the Empire of “Aurangzeb” some day down the years as an ultimate goal and as a matter of fact we rather unconsciously still want Dilli to be our Capital in our dreams (No doubt about it), Indians and specially north Indians know this fact of ours very well and they always want to counter it for one way or other.

Kuldip Nayyar is another North Indian who actually making scoring points in his article to show a down side of our two nation theory vis a vis Indian Nationalism.

True, we both Indians and Pakistanis running our separate empires consists of different races and tribes on two different political methods, Both these empire are basically one in historical terms, Unconsciously or consciously we both want to merge them in one again, so a rivalry has to appear in our deeds and actions.

Bangladesh on the other hand caught between them and still doesn’t know exactly to whom it sided with in the longer run. That’s why the political divide in Bangladesh is so intense between both groups of almost an equal size; stand on opposite direction to one another. This is a unique feature you will not see in Pakistan or in India, where both opposition and ruling parties are unanimous on the direction of their respective countries, {sure extremists in Pakistan are an headache for the time being but again as I always said once US is out of Afghanistan everything will be normal (You will see) Yes… for me its all cosmetics}.

So, down the years they still have to decide which way is the best way forward. By standing in between they are only hurting their interest and making an unusual anarchy in their streets.
 
.
Bangladesh on the other hand caught between them and still doesn’t know exactly to whom it sided with in the longer run. That’s why the political divide in Bangladesh is so intense between both groups of almost an equal size; stand on opposite direction to one another. This is a unique feature you will not see in Pakistan or in India, where both opposition and ruling parties are unanimous on the direction of their respective countries, {sure extremists in Pakistan are an headache for the time being but again as I always said once US is out of Afghanistan everything will be normal (You will see) Yes… for me its all cosmetics}.

So, down the years they still have to decide which way is the best way forward. By standing in between they are only hurting their interest and making an unusual anarchy in their streets.

They may as well choose a path of their own. Agreed with rest of the points, the main fault of North Indian and later West Pakistani Muslims were they failed to see Bangladesh as a separate entity than that of North India-Punjab and tried to mould them in their way.
 
.
the main fault of North Indian and later West Pakistani Muslims were they failed to see Bangladesh as a separate entity than that of North India-Punjab and tried to mould them in their way.

Agreed, They should know the geography and culture of Muslim Bengal better, But again....time is an essence, we both learns our lessons honestly and should tries to figure out our future course of action in that light, As a matter of fact i'm still optimistic that a common political grounds will be acquired by our future generations. So that we could avoid another head on collision once again.

Again, the current north Indians fear of that day which they know in their true conscious will come and are seeing in the their horizon, the article in question is another try to re-issure themselves that "All Is Well".
 
.
Back
Top Bottom