More than 100 million people watch IPL regularly. Wait is it a billion? lol
they come to see white man
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More than 100 million people watch IPL regularly. Wait is it a billion? lol
Again, those advertisers are paying for INTERNATIONAL competition - the value they perceive in pumping that money comes from the calculation that there will be high public interest in INTERNATIONAL competition involving India. If all they cared about was India, then the Ranji trophy and other domestic ODI competitions would be pulling in just as much revenue.
Like I said, the advertisers and television rights bidders might be predominantly from India, but they are pumping in that money because India is playing other countries. That revenue dries up for all parties (including India) if India pulls out or countries other than India pull out.
India should first decide to stay out of CT17..which India won't do..i will appreciate if they really does it..ICC may be at break even without profit..But what india will get 0
Everyone wants to play India. That is how they earn money. Even Pakistan too want to play India. It is simple...India is the money power house of international cricket.
thats not the point, India bring more money because they play international cricket, without them what will India play with
Exactly - ICC event generated revenue should be distributed fairly while domestic league revenue goes directly to the respective boards organizing the events. So what's the problem with the ICC proposal?
Population by country for major cricket nations:
India: 1.3 B
Pakistan: 196 MM
BD: 164MM
SA: 55MM
Zim: 16MM
AUS: 24MM
ENG: 53MM
NZ: 4.5MM
Viewership with India: 1.8B
Viewership w/o India: 512MM
That is a HUGE markdown on viewership and GRPs. And even within the remaining nations, Cricket except in Pak and BD is only mildly popular.
So purely based on numbers, the advertiser decision will be heavily dependent on the viewership which it loses without Indian participation.
thats not the point, India bring more money because they play international cricket, without them what will India play with
The other thing is in other countries cricket is not the major game. Take the example of UK, where football is more popular. So advertisers there will be more interested in football than cricket. But to reach Indian consumer, cricket is the only way. So that make quite a difference on how advertiser view cricket without India
thats not the point, India bring more money because they play international cricket, without them what will India play with
Point is, India has much bigger source of income via cricket. It can dictate terms. It can offer better deals to other teams on a bilateral basis while still getting bigger piece of the pie by kicking ICC out.Correct - viewers want to watch INTERNATIONAL competition involving India - it is the INTERNATIONAL competition that creates value for advertisers, not just India by herself. A boycott of the ICC by the BCCI hurts the BCCI just as much as it hurts the other countries.
For the BCCI to create in essence a 'breakaway organization' in competition to the ICC would eventually arrive at the same point - the cricket boards in each country voted the way they did because they want a fair distribution formula. Why would they join a breakaway league to pursue something they have already considered to not be in their interests?
thats not the point, India bring more money because they play international cricket, without them what will India play with
IPL to say the least.thats not the point, India bring more money because they play international cricket, without them what will India play with
they come to see white man
New Recruit
abe JHAND only 3 overseas players are allowed. And by that logics pakis to come to see white men not to forget that there are black players to there along with NRISthey come to see white man