What's new

BGB holding winter exercise with the Bangladesh Army

Brother, any ideas how Bd army plan to remove Indian dalals from Bd soil?

It seems to me Bd was separated from pak to serve Bhartis interests.

Zakir Bhai, there are patriots in every corner of our country Alhamdulillah, especially in the armed forces. I agree there are some dalals in the ruling political party, but their dalali will serve no purpose if India ever shows direct aggression towards Bangladesh.

An average Bangladeshi will most likely be hospitable and friendly to Indian people, love bollywood movies and what not- but when it comes to Bangladesh's self-interest, they are very much aware of it. No amount of sweet talk can remove the mistrust of Bangladeshis for the Indian Govt.

Although this govt. have taken some decisions which are submissive at times, they have been undertaking good measures to modernize the military, which I welcome. Alhamdulillah, this could only mean that there are patriots within who are resisting the dalals. If the dalals were so dominant, we would never see submarines and missiles inducted in our force. In Sha Allah the patriots will succeed.

As to why BD was created, I will say that greed by Muslim leaders was a major component. How can we blame Indians when our leaders were too busy with their selfish goals? Let's not discuss 1971 anymore. Let's look to the future and pray that Allah protects Muslims everywhere.
 
.
Isn't it more funny how some of you keep on harping about that?Cuz you're actually discrediting your army by saying that after holding firm for over 8 months against irrelevant muktis, they gave up as soon as IA joined the fight(in 13 days actually).Were they that afraid of the Indian army?
0.2 million IA troops+ 234 fighter aircrafts+A navel fleet+a public which was having their rears up for Bharat VS 45000 regular troops+18 Jets+almost no navel support+hostile General Public.
Even a idiot would tell you the outcome.
P.S:-I havn't counted irregular of EP and Bharati Terror outfit numbers.

Zakir Bhai, there are patriots in every corner of our country Alhamdulillah, especially in the armed forces. I agree there are some dalals in the ruling political party, but their dalali will serve no purpose if India ever shows direct aggression towards Bangladesh.

An average Bangladeshi will most likely be hospitable and friendly to Indian people, love bollywood movies and what not- but when it comes to Bangladesh's self-interest, they are very much aware of it. No amount of sweet talk can remove the mistrust of Bangladeshis for the Indian Govt.

Although this govt. have taken some decisions which are submissive at times, they have been undertaking good measures to modernize the military, which I welcome. Alhamdulillah, this could only mean that there are patriots within who are resisting the dalals. If the dalals were so dominant, we would never see submarines and missiles inducted in our force. In Sha Allah the patriots will succeed.

As to why BD was created, I will say that greed by Muslim leaders was a major component. How can we blame Indians when our leaders were too busy with their selfish goals? Let's not discuss 1971 anymore. Let's look to the future and pray that Allah protects Muslims everywhere.
Dalals like Tajo broke largest Muslim nation on Earth,in time of need,they won't mind it being run over by Bharatis once more.If you think like that you are naive.

Looting the local populace for the betterment of martial race province of punjab had nothing to do with it, for a couple of decades and determination of locals?

Do yourself a favour and spontaneously jihadi Pakistani combust,
What was being looted from EP?Like gold,silver or diamonds.
 
.
0.2 million IA troops+ 234 fighter aircrafts+A navel fleet+a public which was having their rears up for Bharat VS 45000 regular troops+18 Jets+almost no navel support+hostile General Public.
Even a idiot would tell you the outcome.
P.S:-I havn't counted irregular of EP and Bharati Terror outfit numbers.


Dalals like Tajo broke largest Muslim nation on Earth,in time of need,they won't mind it being run over by Bharatis once more.If you think like that you are naive.


What was being looted from EP?Like gold,silver or diamonds.

By that I mean economic exploitation that's was on near extortionate level. You self detonating jihadi pak!!
 
.
Looting the local populace for the betterment of martial race province of punjab had nothing to do with it, for a couple of decades and determination of locals?

Do yourself a favour and spontaneously jihadi Pakistani combust,


What are taking about? It was one country so wealth moved around. It’s exit in every countries as per I know.

Bd is not uniformly devolved. Some parts still dart poor compare to other parts. So who are you gong to blame for his unjust?

By that I mean economic exploitation that's was on near extortionate level. You self detonating jihadi pak!!

Do you know the meaning of Jihad? Jihad is integral part of Islam.

Zakir Bhai, there are patriots in every corner of our country Alhamdulillah, especially in the armed forces. I agree there are some dalals in the ruling political party, but their dalali will serve no purpose if India ever shows direct aggression towards Bangladesh.

An average Bangladeshi will most likely be hospitable and friendly to Indian people, love bollywood movies and what not- but when it comes to Bangladesh's self-interest, they are very much aware of it. No amount of sweet talk can remove the mistrust of Bangladeshis for the Indian Govt.

Although this govt. have taken some decisions which are submissive at times, they have been undertaking good measures to modernize the military, which I welcome. Alhamdulillah, this could only mean that there are patriots within who are resisting the dalals. If the dalals were so dominant, we would never see submarines and missiles inducted in our force. In Sha Allah the patriots will succeed.

As to why BD was created, I will say that greed by Muslim leaders was a major component. How can we blame Indians when our leaders were too busy with their selfish goals? Let's not discuss 1971 anymore. Let's look to the future and pray that Allah protects Muslims everywhere.


I want to be hopeful but I’m worried about Bd’s future. Recently I heard two disturbing news that made me mad as hell.

1) A Musjid was inaugurated while playing Band music.
2) A Hindu was appointed as administrator of a Madrasa in Brahmin Baria( or some other place).
 
.
Those are certainly not booby trap. What's the point of making booby traps in friendly exercise? This kinda booby trap is only required when you don't have any other things to prevent enemy movement. The first and third photo could be foxholes while the second one looks like underground bunker with command post and machine gun nest like i saw in military hardware display. But one thing is sure that those are definitely not booby trap. This is not Predator or Apocalypto movie.
Since you are an expert in everything, I now believe your previous assertion that they are training for the trench war. The pictures certainly prove that point. You are a genius of warfare.

By the way, when are you going to restart fussing over 1.8 cft per second of Feni water going to India? It is making BD a desert country.
 
.
Booby traps?
No.
It is clearly a dug-in mortar position with ammo/personnel overhead protection shelter on the side. View attachment 596590
If you are right, then why it is necessary to place false grass turfs on top of the holes? Will it protect those troops that take shelter there? Dig-holes without grass turfs would do a job of temporary shelter for the troops, though.

The holes are also too deep to aim and fire mortar shells. Do you think troops can maneuver mortars without seeing the enemy targets? A deep hole does not serve any purpose other than Booby Trap or the like. It may also be a temporary shelter for the arms among other uses. But, it is not trench for waging a war.
 
.
If you are right, then why it is necessary to place false grass turfs on top of the holes? Will it protect those troops that take shelter there? Dig-holes without grass turfs would do a job of temporary shelter for the troops, though.

The holes are also too deep to aim and fire mortar shells. Do you think troops can maneuver mortars without seeing the enemy targets? A deep hole does not serve any purpose other than Booby Trap or the like. It may also be a temporary shelter for the arms among other uses. But, it is not trench for waging a war.

These are actually not booby traps. These are all defensive dug outs to house machine gun and mortar teams. The green grass topping is for camouflage, so that the unit's position remains hidden. Since BGB faces initial threat from infantry, these defensive positions are very effective at providing cover to the soldiers.
 
.
But in reality a single US Aircraft can hold air superiority....over there entire country.
It has more fire power than entire BDs air force.
Bd air force
Mig-29=8
F-7=36
Aircraft carrier
75
Including
F-35s and F/A-18s
Even Taiwan Air force ca also conquer their air.
F-16 = 180 + F-16V block70/72 orderd=66
Mirage 2000=44
FCK1=100+


And a single US aircraft carrier packed with 55 F-35Cs can hold air superiority over the whole of Pakistan.

Why do you keep repeating the same thing over and over again?
 
.
These are actually not booby traps. These are all defensive dug outs to house machine gun and mortar teams. The green grass topping is for camouflage, so that the unit's position remains hidden. Since BGB faces initial threat from infantry, these defensive positions are very effective at providing cover to the soldiers.
You have amalgamated everything. I ask you the following:

1) If for keeping the arms hidden, why it is necessary to cover the hole with grass turfing. Does camouflaging serve that purpose?
2) If it is the fighting force hiding in foxholes, what is the purpose of training and paying the soldiers for more than twenty years? They have to face enemy troops by digging long trenches and taking shelter and firing behind the dug-out soil or taking up positions in other suitable defensive positions. Hiding in foxholes is probably the most laughable argument a man can propose.
3) See again the foxholes. These are too deep for firing from mortars. The operators have to see their target enemy positions.
 
.
You have amalgamated everything. I ask you the following:

1) If for keeping the arms hidden, why it is necessary to cover the hole with grass turfing. Does camouflaging serve that purpose?
2) If it is the fighting force hiding in foxholes, what is the purpose of training and paying the soldiers for more than twenty years? They have to face enemy troops by digging long trenches and taking shelter and firing behind the dug-out soil or taking up positions in other suitable defensive positions. Hiding in foxholes is probably the most laughable argument a man can propose.
3) See again the foxholes. These are too deep for firing from mortars. The operators have to see their target enemy positions.

As no one here is a military expert everything we say based on couple of pictures would be conjectures that can not be conclusively proven one way or another.

What can be concluded that these have purpose at least as far as this exercise is concerned otherwise they wont be spending such energy on them.

Trenchs a la ww1 these are clearly not.
 
.
And a single US aircraft carrier packed with 55 F-35Cs can hold air superiority over the whole of Pakistan.

Why do you keep repeating the same thing over and over again?

He's just excited his facial hair is finally coming in.

#JasonMomoaGoals

Also, whats a dalal?
 
.
If you are right, then why it is necessary to place false grass turfs on top of the holes? Will it protect those troops that take shelter there? Dig-holes without grass turfs would do a job of temporary shelter for the troops, though.

The holes are also too deep to aim and fire mortar shells. Do you think troops can maneuver mortars without seeing the enemy targets? A deep hole does not serve any purpose other than Booby Trap or the like. It may also be a temporary shelter for the arms among other uses. But, it is not trench for waging a war.


It is a standard procedure for infantry to camouflage all the dug-in position in order not to be seen by enemy observers.

Mortar crews usually operate their mortar without seeing the enemy. They are assisted by the forward observer. It is called "indirect fire”.

If they are not hiding in the dug-in places, they will be direct fire by enemy. That’s the point.

If you don’t have enough time to dug in, then you have to make some sandbags cover for them.

This type of dug-in mortar position is really useful in static Defence like border outposts.

If you still believe it is a booby trap, it is up to you.
 
.
By that I mean economic exploitation that's was on near extortionate level. You self detonating jihadi pak
Please tell us about that economic exploitation?
P.S:-May be we detonated anything inside your family members,that's why you are saying this like nitwits.

Do you know the meaning of Jihad? Jihad is integral part of Islam.
That chutiya is a gangu hiding and trying to disguise.I havn't seen a Bengali Muslim speaking against Jehad.

And a single US aircraft carrier packed with 55 F-35Cs can hold air superiority over the whole of Pakistan.

Why do you keep repeating the same thing over and over again?
What makes you think like that?
 
.
What are taking about? It was one country so wealth moved around. It’s exit in every countries as per I know.

Bd is not uniformly devolved. Some parts still dart poor compare to other parts. So who are you gong to blame for his unjust?
For example, the East has an earning of 120 Taka and West has 80 Taka. By virtue of Islamic brotherhood, West takes away 40 Taka from the East. So, the result is West becomes the owner of 120Taka and East 80 Taka. So, send your valuable opinion about this.

West is now no more able to take away the money from the East. The result is East has a foreign currency reserve of about $32 billion. And what is the reserve of West? It is barely $8 billion. You should be happy that the West gets all the help from rich Arab countries and here you are crying why the West is now unable to get hold of the East's money.

Very strange. Just straighten your curved mental tail!!
 
.
What makes you think like that?


Because it is true.

Those F-35Cs when working with the E-3D would have total air superiority over Pakistan.

Your air-defences would be vaporised by cruise missile and stealthy F-35C strikes using internally carried bombs and missiles. Your F-16s and JF-17s would be taken out by internally carried AMRAAM shots from the F-35Cs. Your pilots would only know the F-35C was there when the RWR warns them of an impending AAM coming their way.

F-35Cs would fly over your cities to show you who rules your skies - same as with BD as your compatriot keeps mentioning.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom