Tiger Genie
BANNED
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2015
- Messages
- 1,645
- Reaction score
- -22
- Country
- Location
When we dont study the past or its reasons we repeat the same mistakes....
Let me give you an analogy:
In America if a white man/ kid is found guilty of a massacre he is 99% declared insane due to some past trauma....But brown kids who have seen nothing but war their whole lives cant suffer from any form illness? Shouldnt they be given more care esp since you have signed an agreement to take in refugees....from war torn countries...Countries YOU bombed...Wars you threw on them that they didnt ask....Showing them dead neighbours which no child should see!
Where is your responsibility? You cant ask another when you havent paid your side of the bargain!
A significant of those do exist and are thriving because the govt has failed to integrate which in sociology terms means to mix ...diversify the surrounding..BUT when you find singular environment, it shows "no integration" occurred so before pointing fingers the laws which were supposed to make this happen "should also" be questioned!
Let me give you an example close to home....
Malaysian indians every now and then complain about racism....they have their own schools, areas and even temples in Malaysia.....yet they cry....Now if tomorrow india was bombarded by America and Malaysians joined the fleet...with soldiers and weapons ...full support....
How will you behave, the Malaysian indians? Please dont give me holier than thou bs we all know ANY human being will feel the heat if thrown in such a situation ...
Now lets say some indians who were prosecuted on their land and they moved to Malaysia and made their ghettos....then Malaysia attacked india - full fledged war, blowing off the taj mahal and any other marks....leaving behind some weapons that militia got and started a full war with the neighbourhood you grew up in bombed to pieces and your old neighbours who were living there vaporized- their only crime they were not rich enough to move out in time....then these militia go and recruit these Malaysian indians who were thrown and forgotten in ghettos....tells them that their mother land needs them is getting "invaded"....
Now tell me as a human being not just an indian what the hell crosses your minds?
Because no matter how much you deny....Afghanistan looks worse than it did before 9/11...Iraq looks like Nagasaki after the nuclear strike! And you expect me to believe not a single civilian was harmed? Esp when at 9/11 people were rushing to "kill some of them" (not indicating in any specific details but with full of anger) (exact words when American army was being sent)
If a white kid can go into trauma enough to kill from child abuse or even some as simple as neglect...then imagine what these people go through?! If you cant then you neglect EQ and are in no position to debate further!
When 9/11 happened Americans were soo full of hate and ignorance they did stereotype and cause pain to a lot of people who put the trust in the justice system....mistakes did happen...Ignoring them or pretending they didnt, not acknowledging them and all this other piled up WRONGS...is not making any right!
1. Who said not to study history? study it thoroughly. BUt you are not going to go back centuries and undo colonisation or crusades or ghazni muhamad. What must get fixed is what you see today which is islamic radicalization. Saying that does not make any of the past atrocities any better. It is a question of realism and avoidance of support through excuse making.
2. WHat exactly are you trying to establish with the Malaysian Indian hypothesis? If there is racism, by all means they have a right to object cry or protest, like everyone else. There is no analogy when you create a hypothesis based purely on several IFs. Again excuse making and a somewhat desperate search for equivalencies. This by the way is one of the core reasons muslim children growing up even with all resources, find it ok to radicalize.
3. Whites committing murders are found insane 99% ? where did you get that stat from? I'd like to see that. If your point is that blacks are treated worse than whites for the same crime, there is some data to support that. I have not seen such data support against browns other than by extrapolation. But even that, when you start exaggerating to 99%, is mere excuse making.
Why do you refuse to understand the obvious pattern? Could Arafat have made the palastenian deal or not? Could Saddam Hussein not have gassed the kurds or not? Could Gaddafi not funded the PanAm hijackers or not? Could A.Q.Khan not have smuggled stuff to N.Korea or not? Could Osama not have bombed WTC or not? Could Taleban not have enable Osama or not? Could Pakistan not have sheltered Osama or not?
If educated muslims do not stop making excuses for their radicalised kin, how will the problem be solved?
PS: BTW when Indians in Srilanka were being systematically sidelined (I am talking pre-LTTE days) there was support for them in India, especially from the Tamilnadu state. But when LTTE turned into violent organization, that support evaporated and India no longer supported them. It led to such frustration on the part of the LTTE that they killed an Indian PM. So when you try to draw equivalencies and parallels, process that, no need for disproven hypotthesis.
Last edited: