What's new

Barefaced Blair says “force is necessary” in fight against “radical Islam”

As you retired now I hope you are over 50 or some but your reply is childish one. NK and China are great allies despite US sanction what you think they still surviving? China helping them out, need proves?
The facts are same as I mention in early post and add little more now, there is nothing in North Korea even you guys take it No Oil No natural sources No gold mines and if you invade it you have to give them food instead of taking their.
You keeping that Dictator for your own interests to continues your bases in Japan/Korea/Philippine etc as a protector. I have a lot of American and European friends we don't hate west but don't like the hypocritical attitude of your governments toward selective targets.

I'm over 50 and you know what is great about being so? I actually state a fact after I know it be a fact.

WikiLeaks: China Is Frustrated With North Korea : NPR
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/30/world/asia/30iht-oil.3334398.html?_r=0
North Korea's Newest Threats Irk Its Main Ally China - ABC News
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/25/w...h-korean-exports-for-fear-of-weapons-use.html
 
.
Unfortunately...there assessment are wrong..the person to whom they are looking for are not in caves..rather in a posh city inside Pakistan...and of course..they caught him and killed him..

and than they live happily after ?? right ?? you doesnt seems that stupid as it seems from your post i guess ?? lol
as terrorism over after OBL ?
 
.
You know it as well that issuing such statements are politicalize same as US and west show frustration towards Israel:wink: to fool others.
Now answer my question isn't NK a dangerous threat? Isn't it's ruling by dictators? If your answer is yes than why international police ie USA not taking action on it? What's the difference between NK and Iraq or Libya?
 
.
You know it as well that issuing such statements are politicalize same as US and west show frustration towards Israel:wink: to fool others.
Now answer my question isn't NK a dangerous threat? Isn't it's ruling by dictators? If your answer is yes than why international police ie USA not taking action on it? What's the difference between NK and Iraq or Libya?

because of this

North Korea threatens to nuke America, destroy 'aggressors' - Washington Times

America doesn't go after those who bite back. IF America had spine they would have attacked it by now. Nuke threat is much worse than Saddam threat of chemical threats
 
.
There is no thing such as Radical Islam. Grow a pair and just say Islam.
 
.
You know it as well that issuing such statements are politicalize same as US and west show frustration towards Israel:wink: to fool others.
Now answer my question isn't NK a dangerous threat? Isn't it's ruling by dictators? If your answer is yes than why international police ie USA not taking action on it? What's the difference between NK and Iraq or Libya?

So no 'thank you' for correcting your perception vs. the reality

- and you now want to discuss world and regional foreign policy with me? After I take the time to discuss it you, you will move NK to Israel to Congo to who knows what.

Sorry, I will bow out. Have a nice day.
 
.
.
because of this

North Korea threatens to nuke America, destroy 'aggressors' - Washington Times

America doesn't go after those who bite back. IF America had spine they would have attacked it by now. Nuke threat is much worse than Saddam threat of chemical threats

Again a remarkable grasp of regional and world realities. Well, not really.

Look up a country called S. Korea and its geographical location + history with N korea, and then try to figure out why going in willy nilly is not the best case scenario. Then look out to research if they have a delivery system that hit the U.S or even one ready. Then read up on how Pakistan surreptitiously leaked nuclear know-how and finally read about their current state under sanctions.

Everything is not a one liner when it comes to the "why".
 
.
So no 'thank you' for correcting your perception vs. the reality

- and you now want to discuss world and regional foreign policy with me? After I take the time to discuss it you, you will move NK to Israel to Congo to who knows what.

Sorry, I will bow out. Have a nice day.
Sigh! You have no answer, well, it was nice to taking with you too.
 
.
Again a remarkable grasp of regional and world realities. Well, not really.

Look up a country called S. Korea and its geographical location + history with N korea, and then try to figure out why going in willy nilly is not the best case scenario. Then look out to research if they have a delivery system that hit the U.S or even one ready. Then read up on how Pakistan surreptitiously leaked nuclear know-how and finally read about their current state under sanctions.

Everything is not a one liner when it comes to the "why".

I'm appalled at how much you are ignorant at Defence tech. If pakistan leaked nuclear know how than how come N.koreans didn't act upon it ? N.Korea weapons are plutonium based Pakistan weapons are Uranium based which explains enough N.korea didn't received any Pakistani help .

Instead of arguing uselessly,harping about conspiracy theories and repeatedly exposing your shallow knowledge about things. It's better you make thorough search on the subject you are going to comment or else it will make you look like a redneck.
 
.
This is where you lose every time in pretending that you care about civilians. It's a huge hole in that 'concern" you seem to portray and can't explain away.

You ONLY seem to be worried about civilian deaths when non muslims are behind it, but we never hear or heard a word about the muslim dictator Saddam killing his people, gassed his people by numbers estimate near a million or more.

We don't hear from you saying "wait a minute- the U.S got rid of a genocidal maniac- murderer of women, children and civilians in his own country. Although the evidence of WMD was wrong, the evidence of him having killed and continue to kill his people nearing a million or more was NOT wrong! "

If Nazi germany was actually lead by a muslim man and not Hitler. You would be cursing at the allied invasion to get rid of him, which had higher casualties.

That would tell us that you really don't care about civilians, rather are more focused about an anti-west bias. Look at the post you are replying to as proof of where your priorities lie. Who is their right mind would say that military action is also not needed to kill fundamental jihadist? You are doing so right now in Pakistan too & through your military!

Somehow you think innocent civilians only get killed in western wars and never when say your army is going after the terrorists by bombing infrastructure, buildings, village and homes filled with civilians too.

More Iraqi civilians were killed by fellow muslims and by a ratio close to 8-10X

Your rant:

The US' role in Iraq from the 80's till 2003, answering apologists

as requested.
 
. .
I'm appalled at how much you are ignorant at Defence tech. If pakistan leaked nuclear know how than how come N.koreans didn't act upon it ? N.Korea weapons are plutonium based Pakistan weapons are Uranium based which explains enough N.korea didn't received any Pakistani help .

Instead of arguing uselessly,harping about conspiracy theories and repeatedly exposing your shallow knowledge about things. It's better you make thorough search on the subject you are going to comment or else it will make you look like a redneck.
This is not about defense technology but about nuclear technology in general. Keywords search for you: 'plutonium uranium processing similarities'. You might find something like this...

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploa...ta/file/65504/6300-comparison-fuel-cycles.pdf
All commercial power reactors in operation today are reliant on the uranium-plutonium (U-Pu) fuel cycle, in which U-235 is the principal fissile nuclide providing the fission neutrons needed to maintain criticality and power output. Most of the commercial reactor fleet uses Low Enriched Uranium (LEU), containing typically < 5 weight percent of U-235, though some reactor types (CANDU being the most prevalent) use natural uranium at 0.71 weight %. In all these reactors the U-238 (which constitutes the bulk of the fuel mass) undergoes fertile neutron captures to produce Pu-239, which is fissile and which increases the useful energy that can be extracted from the fuel. The Pu-239, along with the higher plutonium isotopes produced by neutron captures, is partly consumed as it is produced and some remains in the spent fuel. The remaining plutonium can be recycled in various forms to increase the energy extracted and in a fast reactor breeding cycle the extracted plutonium is sufficient to meet the reactor’s fuel requirements without any further inputs of uranium.
There are a lot of processing technology commonality between the two elements.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom