Jacob Martin
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2015
- Messages
- 1,453
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
Not really, if you're going to twist my words then you may want to try harder. Nepal and BD are two different situations, which is hard to compare.
You don't even know what a catch-22 is.
You stated that the opposition parties in Bangla want lovely relations with Pakistan. I stated the same for the Nepali opposition. I have already laid the framework for my argument. Whether or not it builds into a catch-22 depends on how you wish to build the rest of your case. I concede that you may yet wriggle out of it without creating mutually conflicting conditions. You are welcome to try. I am sure I will beat you to it.
Strategic national decisions should not be taken without consultation and agreement of the opposition. Such things are beyond party politics and it is always best to take everyone along.
If BAL commanded 40% they would not have had to act out last farcical election process. They are in power by force and by subverting the democratic process and asparation of the people. In an fair and open election I doubt they would poll 10% now. The av person want stability and economic growth... Just because ppl have not revolted does not mean people are happy with BAL. they remain in power due to combination of reasons, ineffectual opposition, hapless media, cowed judiciary, a level of economic competency, Indian interference and subvertion of the military and intelligence operations from national agencies to BAL power apparatus.
When the house of cards fall due to weight of hipocracy, nepotism and anti-democratic goals it will be even more spectacular than before.
Your argument is based on a derived version of the Turkish AKP formula - create the conditions wherein a security crisis arises, and then justify one's election based on the resultant situation. Yes, Bangladesh is facing some issues right now, but it would be harsh to say that the government is at fault. One should look at who creates the mayhem. The culprit should not be allowed to benefit from one's own misdeeds.