What's new

Bangladesh Navy indigenous Frigate development program.

Sure, as if it's predecessor couldn't do anything for Bangladesh...

ah.... that random one?.... :cuckoo:

Funny thing is both parties are bottom of the barrel, Throwing barrel crap at each other claiming who has better shyt.. Rather annoying couple of weeks here in PDF with all these Bangladesh vs India dick measuring threads all over.. No wonder South Asians will always take one step forward and two steps back, cos they keep pulling each other down

that's a good observation, my friend....
but you know, its that competition that keeps them vibrant..... boring discussion with everyone measuring their words is for literary debates.... this is a defence forum with people discussion on stuff that are designed to kill humans and the like....

aggression is a must.... though it goes through the roof sometimes....
but the measuring contest you've mentioned, I have to say that we're not really talking of measurement scales.... only the numbers are in discussion.... and even the most sane of discussion threads aren't really talking about scales.... is it because of decline in thoughts or perhaps the drive to topple a competition isn't there....

any thoughts?
 
. .
It is not a cheap copy of any Russian carrier with steam propulsion... :lol:

ea0c2bc4-fd5c-4dcf-bf92-6be1126accff_1482052808.jpg




Sure, as if it's predecessor couldn't do anything for Bangladesh...
Type 001a carrier is still much superior than this Indian carrier. Larger hangar and bigger space. Indian carrier is small and very limited in carrying capacity. :enjoy:

Kuznetsov hull is a very good hull to start with. It wide and big unlike the Indian carrier which is too small for any future upgrade and will be very limited. :enjoy:

You ask the Italian to design for you and brag as indigenous design. What a joke! :lol:
 
. . . . .
Type 001a carrier is still much superior than this Indian carrier. Larger hangar and bigger space. Indian carrier is small and very limited in carrying capacity. :enjoy:
Of course, limited is determined by what you had in mind in the first place.

Kuznetsov hull is a very good hull to start with. It wide and big unlike the Indian carrier which is too small for any future upgrade and will be very limited. :enjoy:
What nonsense: you have no insight into the built in margin of this design. No upgrade would ever turn it into a Kuznetsov sized ship . But that doesn't say anything about margin for upgrading that this design offers. IAC-2, which would be another homemade carrier but would displace more than 60,000 tons, 20,000 tons more than Vikrant. This IS much comparable to 001A. Anyway, it's an evolutionary development, just ast 001A is relative to preceeding 001 and succeeding 002.

You ask the Italian to design for you and brag as indigenous design. What a joke! :lol:
The first ever aircraft carrier to be designed by the Directorate of Naval Design of the Indian Navy is actually based on a DCN (French) design. The 2004 contract with Fincantieri has not apparently effected the overall outward configuration of the design, only the propulsion layout, indicating that the original DCN contract most likely did not cover detail design. The island, however, clearly shows Fincantieri influences (compare to Cavour), But no doubt the Russians (Severnoye design bureau) have also provided key input e.g. ski-jump.
 
.
ah.... that random one?.... :cuckoo:



that's a good observation, my friend....
but you know, its that competition that keeps them vibrant..... boring discussion with everyone measuring their words is for literary debates.... this is a defence forum with people discussion on stuff that are designed to kill humans and the like....

aggression is a must.... though it goes through the roof sometimes....
but the measuring contest you've mentioned, I have to say that we're not really talking of measurement scales.... only the numbers are in discussion.... and even the most sane of discussion threads aren't really talking about scales.... is it because of decline in thoughts or perhaps the drive to topple a competition isn't there....

any thoughts?

What aggression buddy? This "aggression" is called keyboard warriorism. Its very easy when your sitting at home, anonymous, sipping a chai as you type out your "aggression".

Its childish, non constructive, and when viewed from those without any real interest in whats being argued, cheapens the the message thread.

In PDF, this is a message forum where we can all indulge our interests in various topics with those across the world that share those interests. The vast majority of the population, dont really care about the things we talk about.

However, there are some threads on PDF which have mature, really thoughtful, useful, comments. And then there are those that are like this.
 
. . .
Americans never accepted honda or Toyota as their natives despite been built in America...
You Indians have no shame whose parliament think 40% of NASA employees are Indian base on a spam fake male
Someday, these Indians will claim American Red Indians are their true cousins, but with different DNA and faces.
 
.
Someday, these Indians will claim American Red Indians are their true cousins, but with different DNA and faces.
Americans never accepted honda or Toyota as their natives despite been built in America...

The point there is Indian made cars, not Indian brands. However manufacturers such as Suzuki has R&D centers which has developed it's own designs.
 
. .
The point there is Indian made cars, not Indian brands. However manufacturers such as Suzuki has R&D centers which has developed it's own designs.
It may be true what you said. But, branding itself as your own is off the mark. Suzuki remains a Japanese company though it has business, assembling plants and R&W in some other countries. Point is the center of management. It is always Tokyo HQ.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom