What's new

Bangladesh Minister says India may change ‘form and design’ of Tipaimukh project

Species

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 12, 2014
Messages
3,678
Reaction score
-6
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Bangladesh
India may bring changes to the ‘basic form and design' of Tipaimukh hydroelectric project following Bangladesh's opposition and concerns over possible damage to the lower riparian.

Water Resources Minister Anisul Islam Mahmud told Parliament on Sunday that New Delhi has recently conveyed the message to Dhaka of its willingness to reconsider the ‘basic form’ of the project.

Answering to a question from Nizam Uddin Hazari, MP, the minister said a joint survey was being conducted to assess the effects of the project on Bangladesh, reports bdnews24.com.

The survey is a result of 'successful' discussions at different levels of the two governments, the minister said.

"India has informed recently that changes may be brought to the basic form of the project.

"Steps will be taken to finalise the survey once the modified data are provided," he added.

He, however, did not specify the changes India may bring to the project.

India had planned the Tipaimukh project two decades ago to generate 1500 megawatt power for northeastern Manipur state and to irrigate the downstream State of Assam by building a dam on the Barak river.

When the implementation of the project started in 2011, Bangladesh protested fearing damaging effects on the common rivers. The river divides and enters Bangladesh’s Sylhet district as the Surma and Kushiara that further amalgamate as the Meghna river.

Environmental groups are expressing concern that the dam at 200 kilometres upstream of Bangladesh will impact the country's northeast and destroy the biodiversity of Haor wetlands.

There are also concerns over reduced water flow during dry season and flood in the rainy season.

Facing protests, New Delhi assured Dhaka of not doing something that can harm Bangladesh but did not scrap the project.

Amidst mounting protests in Bangladesh's political arena and Sylhet region, Minister Anisul said two years ago that “Bangladesh will also be benefitted once the Tipaimukh dam is set up.”

He had argued that the several ideas over the dam were not based on sufficient information. "There won't be a flood in Sylhet in the rainy season, and there will be water during winter once the Tipaimukh dam is built," he had said.

On Sunday, the minister told Parliament: "Discussions at different levels are underway so that India's project to link rivers will not affect Bangladesh's environment and other sectors negatively."

Of the 57 rivers, Bangladesh shares with its neighbours, 54 flows from India.

In reply to another query regarding the construction of the Ganges barrage, the water resources minister said an eight-member technical delegation visited Bangladesh to assess the effects of the project proposed by Bangladesh on India.

Once the barrage is built, the minister said, it would be possible to keep the flow of 123 rivers in south-west region unchanged.

http://www.thefinancialexpress-bd.com/2017/01/30/60478/India-‘may-change’-Tipaimukh-design
 
Tipaimukh Dam will be more harmful to India than to Bangladesh. I can not understand PDF Indians. They want to be super power so aggressively that they will support the dam Blindly.

But the dam will be used to store water in vast area of wild-life rich Manipur which will destroy a lot of Wild Life there and displace local indigenous community.


The Dam will be built in an earthquake prone territory. If the dam is damaged in such incident, Millions of Assamese will die within minutes in a man made tsunami.



It is a dam, not a barrage. So No water will be diverted. However, Bangladesh should walk carefully here. If affected, The affected region of Bangladesh will be the " Hakaluki " which is Ramsar conserved territory. The dam may take away potential bioload damaging local biodiversity .


 
Last edited:
If the dam does not divert the water then, Bangladesh should not be worried about.
It should not become a habit to protest anything and everything that comes at our way.
 
If the dam does not divert the water then, Bangladesh should not be worried about.
It should not become a habit to protest anything and everything that comes at our way.

But the Problem is Meghna + Brahmaputra + Padma together carry 20% of World Silts. It is huge and India is not capable to handle the silt load thereby destroying the region both upstream and downstream by blocking the movement.
 
But the Problem is Meghna + Brahmaputra + Padma together carry 20% of World Silts. It is huge and India is not capable to handle the silt load thereby destroying the region both upstream and downstream by blocking the movement.

YOu again is half educated about this. 99% of the silt is carried by the river only in the rainy season when erosion and land slide in the Himalayan mountains takes place. Dams are wide open at that time.
 
YOu again is half educated about this. 99% of the silt is carried by the river only in the rainy season when erosion and land slide in the Himalayan mountains takes place. Dams are wide open at that time.
That's correct. But eventually siltation will emerge as a great problem anyway. With time silts will deposit on the base of the reservoir & decreesing the depth. Thus decreesing the amount of water that could be stored to produce electricity.

See what's happening with our very own Karnafuli Dam.
 
YOu again is half educated about this. 99% of the silt is carried by the river only in the rainy season when erosion and land slide in the Himalayan mountains takes place. Dams are wide open at that time.

Nah was quoting Expert opinion

পৃথিবীর অন্যান্য দেশের তুলনায় বাংলাদেশে পলির গুরুত্ব অপরিসীম। বাংলাদেশের নদীগুলো দিয়ে বছরে ২.৪ বিলিয়ন টন পলি আসে। অর্থাত্ বাংলাদেশের নদীগুলো দিয়ে বিশ্বের ১৮.৫ শতাংশ পলি পরিবাহিত হয়। অথচ বাংলাদেশের আয়তন পৃথিবীর ভূখণ্ডের এক হাজার ভাগের এক ভাগের চেয়ে কম। চীনের কিছু অঞ্চল ছাড়া কোথাও নদীতে পলির পরিমাণ এত বেশি নয়। পলির আধিক্যের ফলে উজানে নির্মিত জলাধারগুলো অতিদ্রুত পলিতে ভরে অকার্যকর হয়ে যায়। এ প্রসঙ্গে ইতিপূর্বে গোমতী বাঁধ ও লোকটাক বাঁধের অভিজ্ঞতা আলোচিত হয়েছে।
 
Nah was quoting Expert opinion

পৃথিবীর অন্যান্য দেশের তুলনায় বাংলাদেশে পলির গুরুত্ব অপরিসীম। বাংলাদেশের নদীগুলো দিয়ে বছরে ২.৪ বিলিয়ন টন পলি আসে। অর্থাত্ বাংলাদেশের নদীগুলো দিয়ে বিশ্বের ১৮.৫ শতাংশ পলি পরিবাহিত হয়। অথচ বাংলাদেশের আয়তন পৃথিবীর ভূখণ্ডের এক হাজার ভাগের এক ভাগের চেয়ে কম। চীনের কিছু অঞ্চল ছাড়া কোথাও নদীতে পলির পরিমাণ এত বেশি নয়। পলির আধিক্যের ফলে উজানে নির্মিত জলাধারগুলো অতিদ্রুত পলিতে ভরে অকার্যকর হয়ে যায়। এ প্রসঙ্গে ইতিপূর্বে গোমতী বাঁধ ও লোকটাক বাঁধের অভিজ্ঞতা আলোচিত হয়েছে।
Bhai, can you give link to the full article,please?
 
Bhai, can you give link to the full article,please?

2009_09_07_12_5_b.jpg


x2009_09_08_12_3_b.jpg.pagespeed.ic.EHgfOrGON_.jpg


2009_09_09_11_1_b.jpg


2009_09_10_11_3_b.jpg


2009_09_11_13_1_b.jpg
 
Bangaldesh can't be affected because of this dam, it's just fashionable in Bangladesh to oppose everything India does.
 
Tipaimukh Dam will be more harmful to India than to Bangladesh. I can not understand PDF Indians. They want to be super power so aggressively that they will support the dam Blindly.

But the dam will be used to store water in vast area of wild-life rich Manipur which will destroy a lot of Wild Life there and displace local indigenous community.


The Dam will be built in an earthquake prone territory. If the dam is damaged in such incident, Millions of Assamese will die within minutes in a man made tsunami.



It is a dam, not a barrage. So No water will be diverted. However, Bangladesh should walk carefully here. If affected, The affected region of Bangladesh will be the " Hakaluki " which is Ramsar conserved territory. The dam may take away potential bioload damaging local biodiversity .



There is a huge resentment in Manipur over this project, some protests have also taken place in Sylhet. A lot of activists protesting against this project have been abducted or killed...

Apparently, the Kaptai dam was one of the major reasons behind the CHT insurgency. The Tipaimukh dam is a far bigger project than Kaptai and thus, the reservoir will displace a far bigger population in Manipur...
 
India may bring changes to the ‘basic form and design' of Tipaimukh hydroelectric project following Bangladesh's opposition and concerns over possible damage to the lower riparian.

Water Resources Minister Anisul Islam Mahmud told Parliament on Sunday that New Delhi has recently conveyed the message to Dhaka of its willingness to reconsider the ‘basic form’ of the project.

Answering to a question from Nizam Uddin Hazari, MP, the minister said a joint survey was being conducted to assess the effects of the project on Bangladesh, reports bdnews24.com.

The survey is a result of 'successful' discussions at different levels of the two governments, the minister said.

"India has informed recently that changes may be brought to the basic form of the project.

"Steps will be taken to finalise the survey once the modified data are provided," he added.

He, however, did not specify the changes India may bring to the project.

India had planned the Tipaimukh project two decades ago to generate 1500 megawatt power for northeastern Manipur state and to irrigate the downstream State of Assam by building a dam on the Barak river.

When the implementation of the project started in 2011, Bangladesh protested fearing damaging effects on the common rivers. The river divides and enters Bangladesh’s Sylhet district as the Surma and Kushiara that further amalgamate as the Meghna river.

Environmental groups are expressing concern that the dam at 200 kilometres upstream of Bangladesh will impact the country's northeast and destroy the biodiversity of Haor wetlands.

There are also concerns over reduced water flow during dry season and flood in the rainy season.

Facing protests, New Delhi assured Dhaka of not doing something that can harm Bangladesh but did not scrap the project.

Amidst mounting protests in Bangladesh's political arena and Sylhet region, Minister Anisul said two years ago that “Bangladesh will also be benefitted once the Tipaimukh dam is set up.”

He had argued that the several ideas over the dam were not based on sufficient information. "There won't be a flood in Sylhet in the rainy season, and there will be water during winter once the Tipaimukh dam is built," he had said.

On Sunday, the minister told Parliament: "Discussions at different levels are underway so that India's project to link rivers will not affect Bangladesh's environment and other sectors negatively."

Of the 57 rivers, Bangladesh shares with its neighbours, 54 flows from India.

In reply to another query regarding the construction of the Ganges barrage, the water resources minister said an eight-member technical delegation visited Bangladesh to assess the effects of the project proposed by Bangladesh on India.

Once the barrage is built, the minister said, it would be possible to keep the flow of 123 rivers in south-west region unchanged.

http://www.thefinancialexpress-bd.com/2017/01/30/60478/India-‘may-change’-Tipaimukh-design
if bd govt isn;t being transparent enough then....
ye chutiya haramkhor bick gaye hai
 
Back
Top Bottom