What's new

Bangladesh leans to China for Teesta management amidst Indian neglect

Black_cats

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 31, 2010
Messages
10,031
Reaction score
-5
Published on 12:00 AM, August 10, 2020
Bangladesh leans to China for Teesta management amidst Indian neglect

Jagaran Chakma

With years of diplomatic negotiations with India over the Teesta river's management leading to no visible output, the Ministry of Water Resources is now seeking to get it done by China, that too with a loan from the latter.

In a letter to the Economic Relations Division (ERD) last month, the ministry sought a $983.27 million loan from China to implement a "Teesta River Comprehensive Management and Restoration Project".

The project summary states that floods lead to serious erosion for a lack of necessary protective measures, leaving huge amounts of property and home estates submerged every year.

The majority of an existing embankment has been eroded for a lack of proper maintenance while a water crisis arises in the dry winter months.

Some 113 kilometres of the 315-kilometre river lies in Bangladesh.

There are three to four hydro-electricity projects on Teesta in Sikkim, India where the river originates and two irrigation projects in West Bengal, according to Syed Muazzem Ali, a former Bangladesh high commissioner to India.

A dam constructed on the Indian side causes the water flow to reduce downstream in winter, leading to a water crisis for two months on the Bangladesh side, said Md Kabir Bin Anwar, senior secretary to the ministry.

A deal on sharing Teesta's waters has been pending for the last eight years due to West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee's strong opposition to it.

"If we can implement the project, a vast area on the Bangladesh side can be supplied with water during the crisis season," Anwar said.

The project not only aims at river regime and flood control but also to meet a water crisis in the dry season and enable economic development in the greater Rangpur region.

Its other aspects are land reclamation, development and utilisation, transportation and shipping, mitigation of social and environmental impact and restoration of ecosystem and promoting socio-economic development of locals.

The ministry is keen to implement the project to improve agricultural output in the Teesta river basin, develop a large-scale industrial park and establish a unique, modern and liveable urban complex.

The letter, signed by Khairun Nahar, the ministry's senior assistant chief, and sent on 23 July, also stated of plans to construct and commission a photovoltaic power plant under the project.

The development plans have been held back for a decade for a lack of funds.

Cooperation has been sought from development partners such as the World Bank and the Japan International Cooperation Agency but there has been no positive reply yet, said sources in the ministry.

However, some Chinese companies have already expressed their interest in implementing the project, they added.

In September 2016 a letter of intent had been signed between the Bangladesh Water Development Board and the Chinese state-owned Power Construction of China (Power China) under which the latter completed a feasibility study and prepared a master plan to implement the project.

However, a 2017 BBC report seemingly warned of "debt-trap diplomacy".

It reported a large group of researchers outside China having compiled a major database detailing virtually all of China's aid to recipient countries.

Citing more than 5,000 projects found across 140 countries, it revealed that China and the US rivalled each other in terms of how much they offer to other countries.

At least a quarter of the money given out under the traditional definition of aid by Western industrialised nations represents a direct grant, not a loan that needs to be repaid.

That aid is given with the main goal of developing the economic development and welfare of recipient countries.

In contrast, only 21 per cent of the money that China gives to other countries can be considered as traditional aid. The "lion's share" of that money is given in commercial loans that have to be repaid to Beijing with interest.

The team's other major finding: when China gives out traditional aid, the recipient countries reap impressive economic rewards.

For a long period, there were suspicions that Chinese aid projects were only set up to benefit China; infrastructure projects built by imported Chinese workers, for instance, that did little to improve the lives of people on the ground.

However, this research showed that China is just as capable of managing development aid projects as Western donors.

The researchers showed that both Beijing and Washington tend to offer money to countries which support them at the United Nations.

But for China, economics plays a key role: Beijing is often focused on promoting Chinese exports or market-rate loans where China wants to get the loan repaid with interest.

Moreover, though these Chinese loans are attractive for fewer strings being attached, in the case of Bangladesh there have been conditions for appointing Chinese contractors.

Several Chinese companies were interested in implementing this project but the Chinese government was yet to give a green signal, said Md Shahriar Kader Siddiky, joint secretary (Asia wing) to the ERD.

The ministry needs to fill up a Chinese application form seeking the loan, he said.

"We will send the documents to the Chinese embassy for including the project under applications seeking Chinese funds."

www.thedailystar.net/business/news/bangladesh-leans-china-teesta-management-amidst-indian-neglect-1942561%3famp
 
.
"If we can implement the project, a vast area on the Bangladesh side can be supplied with water during the crisis season," Anwar said.

The project not only aims at river regime and flood control but also to meet a water crisis in the dry season and enable economic development in the greater Rangpur region.
This is the correct approach. We should not be the hostage of Indian whims when it comes to river water. Bangladesh is one of rainiest country in the world. Internal renewable surface water run off entirely generated within Bangladesh is 105 cubic kilometers per annum. This means, if every single drop of water is stopped at the border before entering Bangladesh, our rivers will still generate 105 cubic kilometers of renewable water annually. Thia amount of water is three times the annual water uses in Bangladesh including irrigation demand.

Moreover, our rivers receive about 1100 cubic kilometers of surface runoff annually from across the boundary, mostly coming from India. India can not stop or divert most of this amount(specially during monsoon season) unless they are willing to create a vast inland sea within India ! So willingly or unwillingly India must release water into Bangladeshi rivers so that excess water return back to Bay of Bengal. So with proper water resource management, we should never have any water scarcity. And we also don't have to ask India in vain to give water which in any case our rightful share according to international law. So this Bangladesh-China collaboration in Teesta water management is an important step in a right direction.
 
Last edited:
.
Bangladesh leans to China for Teesta management amidst Indian neglect
The report below supplements the news on Teesta management uploaded by @Black_cats. The reporting below gives more on the project details.

https://tbsnews.net/economy/investing-983-million-teesta-will-bring-29-billion-benefits-56053
Investing $983 million on Teesta will bring $2.9 billion in benefits
It will boost the economy of the area; create new jobs, with poor people and women getting at least 30% of the non-technical work
File Photo/ BSS
" style="box-sizing: inherit; cursor: pointer;">
teesta-barrage.jpg

File Photo/ BSS

The government expects to reclaim 170.87 square km of land from the Teesta by dredging the main channel of the river. Additionally, it plans to build dams on a needs-based approach.

The land that is planned to be reclaimed is worth $1,570.84 million. And the value of properties that the newly built dams will save is estimated at $1,346.02 million. The total benefit accruing from the project will be $2,916.89 million.

Many developmental works, such as setting up economic zone, townships, power plants, and expanding farming, will be possible on the reclaimed land, according to a feasibility study of the Bangladesh Water Development Board.

The Teesta River originates in the Himalayas and flows through the Indian states of Sikkim and West Bengal before entering Bangladesh, where it flows into the Brahmaputra.

The river is 315 km in length, of which 113 km flow through Bangladesh. The Teesta is 0.70 km to 5.5 km wide in its Bangladesh part, its average width being 3.1 km.

Land on both banks of the river disappears every monsoon due to tidal surges and river erosion. Besides, the river has no water in the dry season.

Every year, the government takes some measures to provide relief to the local people, but there have been no results of such measures yet, said a Bangladesh Water Development Board official.

Against this backdrop, the Teesta River Comprehensive Management and Restoration project has been undertaken. Even so, a shortage of funds has been a barrier to its implementation, notes the Bangladesh Water Development Board.

The Bangladesh Water Development Board signed a memorandum of understanding in September 2016 with the Power Construction Corporation of China or Powerchina to conduct a technical assessment, make detailed designs, and undertake the construction work of the project. The MOU is also supposed to help the Bangladesh government get a loan from China.

Powerchina submitted a master plan relating to the Sustainable River Management project in Bangladesh, following which a feasibility study report that included estimates was prepared.

The cost of the proposed project is about $983.27 million. Of the amount, China will provide $853.05 million as a loan.

Apart from the reclaimed land, about 1,400 lakh cubic metres of the river will be dredged, and a 224.30 km dike will be built and repaired.

Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina sought Chinese assistance on her visit to Beijing last July for the implementation of the Teesta River Comprehensive Management and Restoration project. Chinese President Xi Jinping had assured Hasina of his support.

In the industrial park on the site of the project, there will be garment factories, textile mills, fertiliser factories, agricultural products processing plants, feed factories and a warehouse.

When implemented, the project will boost the economy of the area through creating new jobs. The poor people and women of the area will be privy to at least 30 percent of the non-technical work relating to the project.

Agricultural produce from the land will be transported for sale to cities like Dhaka and Chattogram. The project plan also includes a satellite town to be built within Rangpur Division.

"We will now prepare a project proposal based on the feasibility study and we have written to the Economic Relations Division of the finance ministry for funds," said Bangladesh Water Development Board Managing Director AM Aminul Haque.

"We will start work after receiving the funds and expect to complete it by 2024."
 
Last edited:
. . .
The project not only aims at river regime and flood control but also to meet a water crisis in the dry season and enable economic development in the greater Rangpur region.

Bold part: The above three lines speak of the main two goals of the new Teesta project. A little elaborately speaking,

1) One is to control flood during the rainy season that causes havoc in the surrounding areas destroying houses, paddy and other agriculture goods.
2)The second is to hold/retain water in the river for use to irrigate farmlands during dry season.

But, I find the project portfolio inconsistent with these targets.

1) It says of narrowing the width from the current 12km to just 2km. I wonder, if the authority has properly analysed the discharge capacity through so narrow a channel. The discharge capacity (Q) is a function of other variables like the co-efficient of resistance (n), slope/gradient (S), velocity of flow (V), cross-sectional area of water flow (A), and the hydraulic radius (R).

I think 'R' may be difficult for many people here to understand, so, I will not explain it. But, both 'A' and 'R' depend upon the size and shape of a channel/river. It is obvious that there will be less quantity of water flow through a 2km wide Teesta than it would have been with a wider one, say, 8km. It is not exactly as low as the 1/4th of what would have been with a 8km one. It is a little more complex than that which I will not discuss here.

2) The portfolio speaks of retaining water for dry season use. Can someone tell me how can water be retained in large quantity when there is no proposal to build another barrage at the downstream part of Teesta, say, 1km above the juncture with Jamuna/Brahmaputra. Only a barrage 90 km downstream from the present one can create a reservoir for water to be used in the dry season use.

In my opinion, selecting the current Teesta Barrage site was a wrong one. Rather, it should have been built at the site I am proposing here. It would be a double mistake if a project is undertaken without another barrage. It will cause more harm to the country's economic future.

I sincerely want people here to go through the short opinion I have forwarded instead of bullying me for saying something unusual but correct. Please prove me wrong instead of saying such and such big international consulting companies have recommended the project without another downstream barrage. The thing is, they follow what our ignorant BD authority instructs them to do.

There are but a very few original engineering planners in the country. Govt civil engineers only do what they are ordered to do, they are not asked to do the planning like it is in the developed countries. Our MPs and ministers with peasant background are the planners.

@Michael Corleone, @sbmc27, @Atlas, @Homo Sapiens, @mmr, @Arthur and all others.
 
Last edited:
.
NOTHING will happen, period. Just like Ganga barrage, awami indian stooges will submit to india for project approval and india will deny it. Downstream of Padma, there is no other country; other than doing slavery labeled as "blood relation", Awami league indian stooges has no need for indian approval. These news of Teesta are for gullible class to be charmed and awami cheerleaders to do nightly howling.

Ganges Barrage Project shelved
Govt looks for alternative option
Mustafizur Rahman | Published: 00:05, Apr 13,2017 | Updated: 00:24, Apr 13,2017

The government on Wednesday announced that it abandoned the $ 4 billion Ganges Barrage Project, implementation of which awaited India’s consent until now.
https://www.newagebd.net/article/13348/ganges-barrage-project-shelved
 
. .
NOTHING will happen, period. Just like Ganga barrage, awami indian stooges will submit to india for project approval and india will deny it. Downstream of Padma, there is no other country; other than doing slavery labeled as "blood relation", Awami league indian stooges has no need for indian approval. These news of Teesta are for gullible class to be charmed and awami cheerleaders to do nightly howling.

Ganges Barrage Project shelved
Govt looks for alternative option
Mustafizur Rahman | Published: 00:05, Apr 13,2017 | Updated: 00:24, Apr 13,2017

The government on Wednesday announced that it abandoned the $ 4 billion Ganges Barrage Project, implementation of which awaited India’s consent until now.
https://www.newagebd.net/article/13348/ganges-barrage-project-shelved
My Dear @idune, do you really think the Ganges Barrage Project would have been useful if built at the Rajbari point? It would have been like another white elephant called the Teesta Barrage. Teesta was built only 10km south of the border. Similarly, Rajbari point is also quite near the Farakka point in India.

The Ganges Barrage location was selected by President Ziaur Rahman at a wrong place and the Teesta Barrage location was also similarly selected by President Ershad. Both were military people, but lacked the thoughtfulness of President Ayub Khan.

A Ganges Barrage Project located at Chandpur or further south at the Bhola point would have been much functional, but, not at Rajbari point. Hence, the GoB decision to shelve it was correct.
 
Last edited:
.
My Dear @idune, do you really think the Ganges Barrage Project would have been useful if built at the Rajbari point? It would have been like another white elephant called the Teesta Barrage. Teesta was built only 10km south of the border. Similarly, Rajbari point is also quite near the Farakka point in India.

The Ganges Barrage location was selected by President Ziaur Rahman at a wrong place and the Teesta Barrage location was also similarly selected by President Ershad. Both were military people, but lacked the thoughtfulness of President Ayub Khan.

A Ganges Barrage Project located at Chandpur or further south at the Bhola point would have been much functional, but, not at Rajbari point. Hence, the GoB decision to shelve it was correct.

Before you open your mouth, you needed to read the article -

"Bangladesh’s much-hyped project for the construction of Ganges Barrage at Pangsha .
It took Bangladesh government four years beginning 2009 to complete the feasibility studies for the Ganges Barrage construction spending Tk42 crore. The 13-volume report weighing 23 kg providing design details was submitted to the government in 2013, said Ganges Barrage Project officials."

Project was undertaken in 2009 and feasibility/design completed by 2013. Nothing to do with Zia or anyone vision at past. It was not for technical reason or because of place selection issue; Awami regime for no reason went to indian to get permission and they rejected it. Indian gave excuse that this barrage will cause flooding in india, which is laughable excuse but offcourse Awami indian stooges are dedicated to oblige indian instruction.
 
.
The Ganges barrage will be a 165-kilometre long reservoir running from Rajbari to Chapainawabganj districts, with a depth of 12.5 metres.

It will hold a phenomenal 2.9 billion cubic litres and cost Tk 314 billion (approximately USD 4 billion). The barrage will retain the water of the trans-boundary river Ganga, known as the Padma in Bangladesh, during the monsoon and feed small rivers during the lean season.

This will help Bangladesh flush the small rivers and reduce salinity, a major threat to public health and agriculture in the country's southwest.

Islam sought to allay fears of flooding on the Indian side of the Ganges. "The project has provided for allocations for upgrading and raising embankments on the Indian side to avoid any flooding," he said.

https://www.firstpost.com/world/wha...-wants-india-to-be-a-stakeholder-3044408.html
 
.
Ganges dam project stumbles on Indian flooding fears
Rafiqul Islam
6 Min Read
DHAKA (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - Bangladesh’s plan to build a dam on the Ganges River to ease water shortages in its southwest coastal region hangs in the balance as neighboring India has yet to accept the plan.

Bangladesh started work on the proposed Ganges Barrage Project during the tenure of the previous ruling Awami League government in the late 1990s.

The country has already completed a feasibility study and the design for the proposed 2.1 kilometer-long dam, due to be constructed at Pangsha in Rajbari district, about 100 km downstream from the Farakka Barrage in India’s West Bengal state.

The Ganges, known as the Padma River in Bangladesh, is one of the major sources of surface water in the southwest of the country.

Water scarcity and water salinity - made worse by climate change - are common problems in the region, which is why Bangladesh has given the barrage project top priority.

Experts say salinity is on the rise in the southwest due to sea-level rise from global warning. The proposed dam would release water through river channels to help dilute the salt levels.

However, experts say it will be difficult to push forward with the project in the absence of support from India.

INDIAN OBJECTIONS
New Delhi sent a letter to the Bangladesh government in early 2015 saying Indian technical experts had evaluated project documents sent by Dhaka and were concerned the dam could cause flooding in India.

The Ganges flows out of India on flat terrain from West Bengal. India in the letter predicted that even a slight increase in the river’s water level would cause huge submergence in areas of India bordering Bangladesh.

New Delhi asked Dhaka to send the full feasibility study, including scientific modeling, so it could be sure there would be no increase in water levels on Indian territory.

Bangladesh Water Resources Minister Anisul Islam Mahmud told the Thomson Reuters Foundation all the documents requested by India were sent last April, but New Delhi had yet to respond.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...n-indian-flooding-fears-idUSKCN0UR2PE20160113
 
. .
Before you open your mouth, you needed to read the article -
What a Islamic style of writing? You have not changed from what you were before. This thread is all about Teesta Barrage. Contribute on it if you can. But, do not use your Mullah language.
 
Last edited:
.
What a Islamic style of writing? You have not changed from what you were before. This thread is aoll about Teesta Barrage. Contribute on it if you can. But, do not use your Mullah language.

Once again you caught red handed with lie as news article showed when project initiated, feasibility and design done etc. Instead of bringing religion, which OFF topic to the discussion, stick to the fact that Teesta project is just another farce by awami league indian stooges, just like it was Ganga barrage. Awami indian stooges will fold Teesta project as soon india instruct them to do so. If that is the reality you can not accept, that is your problem to deal with.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom