What's new

Baidu’s self-driving cars require more human intervention than Alphabet’s Waymo

Hehehehe...An Indian is out to ridicule China without knowing the ABC of AI market:

AI Business value is $1.2 trillion in 2018 and will be $3.9 trillion in 2022

https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2018/...trillion-in-2022.html#so-post-comments-144425



View attachment 473045


How did you assume again that I know nothing about AI?

You know China and US in a development phase of driverless car. Weren’t many US driverless car crashed themselves into the freeway dividers and building, also killed 1 pedestrian? Why not OP report those news?

Ummm... the US has been testing the autonomous vehicles for so long that some incidents are bound to happen.

this article is about self-driving in carlifornia, where google has head start. google has collected tons of data on roads to train their ai long before others got permission to test theirs. just look at the number of miles they have clocked. google's waymo wouldn't do so well in in beijing where baidu is way way ahead. lol

Well. You don't seem to be aware of the industry. US, and California, were pretty much the first to open up driving tests for autonmous vehicles. Earlier than China. In fact, Baidu started testing its vehicles in California before it tested them in China.

Where is india in AI sector?

LeL

Significantly behind.

You can look here. Its inconsequential anyway:

temcde3e-png.473045

What is inconsequential? This is some random graph purpoting to show some possible impact that AI can have.

it's a stupid comparison. waymo is way ahead in the US, because they had years head start. baidu is way ahead of waymo in china. self-driving is about data (maps, road signs, traffic lights, shapes, behavior, rules, etc.. long list..). the more data you collected, the better you can train your algorithms to make more accurate predictions. google doesn't even have map in china, their self-driving probably worse than tesla's autopilot that can't even dodge a big garbage truck in stationary over there. :D

No it's not. California is ground zero for all testing. Even Baidu started drive testing there first.

Baidu is not the leader. I guess you are wrong. There are better companies is China doing well in autonomous. I guess must jealousy that spur your action.

Who else is better than Baidu in self driving in China?
 
. .
.
I asked who else is better than Baidu, not who else is trying to hitch a self-driving ride.

This company has no prior experience at AI, and has just begun testing, compared to Baidu who has been doing that now for years.

In fact, Tu Simple is one of the firms that is far better than this firm.
I don’t know what rubbish are I trying to project. Baidu just started autonomous bus driving test while this state owned company already go through all test with satisfy result and approved to be used on road. If it’s not better then how come it’s ahead of baidu in autonomous bus driving? There are many AI automative companies. The best will be state owned. Relying on a few stupid western article which has no idea of real China does not help you :enjoy:
 
.
Well. You don't seem to be aware of the industry. US, and California, were pretty much the first to open up driving tests for autonmous vehicles. Earlier than China. In fact, Baidu started testing its vehicles in California before it tested them in China.

baidu has done more tests in china. baidu doing tests in california, because they have their big r&d team in silicon valley and it's doesn't matter. self-driving over there is not the same as in china, the way people drive, the road infrastructure, road rules, signs, language, maps, etc.. in other countries are not the same like in california. just because waymo does well in american city, doesn't mean they can do well in beijing or calcuta's roads. it's not plug and play. waymo is better than everyone in the US, because they've driven over 1 million miles on the roads. they've recorded large amount of data for use to train their ai. imagine how many miles they have to do in more complex roads in beijing with so many unpredictable variables to be as good like in carlifornia?

one of the most important pieces for self-driving car is high-definition MAPs. google has that in the US, but not in china. only baidu and alibaba has. you cannot do self-driving without hd maps. so, you and the article saying waymo is far ahead is not correct. waymo hasn't driven a mile in china. their ai only know how to drive american with american data and blind without map..... like i said before.. if waymo's car put on beijing roads right now, it will poeform worse than tesla's autopilot (tesla using chinese navinfo map for their autpilot)... waymo is the king in carlifornia, but not in beijing. baidu and other chinese are way way ahead of them. they have clocked hundred thousands of miles and their teams are former people that help build waymo and other american ai tech.

it's common sense. i don't know why anybody try to refute that? i know my way very well in my city, but i'm gonna be lost in another country. it's gonna take me awhile to learn and adjust and i'm human. imagine a machine, who is way way dumber than me.. lol :D

.
 
Last edited:
.
baidu has done more tests in china. baidu doing tests in california, because they have their big r&d team in silicon valley and it's doesn't matter.. self-driving over there is not the same as in china. the way people drive, the road infrastructure, road rules, signs, language, maps, etc.. in other countries are not the same like in california. just because waymo does well in american city, doesn't mean they can do well in beijing or calcuta's roads. it's not plug and play. waymo is better than everyone in the US, because they've driven over 1 million miles on the roads. they've recorded large amount of data for use to train their ai. imagine how many miles they have to do in more complex roads in beijing with so many unpredictable variables to be as good like in carlifornia?

one of the most important pieces for self-driving car is high-definition MAPs. google has that in the US, but not in china. only baidu and alibaba has. you cannot do self-driving without hd maps. so, you and the article saying waymo is far ahead is not correct. waymo hasn't driven a mile in china. their ai only know how to drive american with american data and blind without map.
like i said before.. if waymo's car put on beijing roads right now, it's worse than tesla's autopilot. btw, tesla using chinese navinfo for their autpilot... waymo is the king in carlifornia, but not in beijing. baidu and other chinese are way way ahead of them. they have clocked hundred thousands of miles and their teams are former people that help build waymo other american ai tech.

it's common sense. i don't now why anybody try to refute that? i know my way very well in my city, but i'm gonna be lost in another country. it's gonna take me awhile to learn and adjust and i'm human. imagine a machine, who is way way dumber than me.. lol :D

.
Precisely, this anti China trash will misreported things and alway yet mislead others to think bad of China. He got a massive inferiority complex becos India is such a useless country compare to China. There is nothing proud achievement for Indian as to China :lol:

The only way to ease his wounded pride is to tarnish the more successful one to make him feel better. :enjoy:

Despicable!
 
.
Precisely, this anti China trash will misreported things and alway yet mislead others to think bad of China. He got a massive inferiority complex becos India is such a useless country compare to China. There is nothing proud achievement for Indian as to China :lol:

The only way to ease his wounded pride is to tarnish the more successful one to make him feel better. :enjoy:

Despicable!
he thinks self-driving software is plug and play :D
 
.
. .
Back
Top Bottom