Ayub Khan missed opportunity for Kashmir’s freedom in 1962: ex-CIA official

[Saifullah Sani]

Former Central Investigation Agency (CIA) official Bruce Riedel in his new book 'JFK's Forgotten Crisis: Tibet, the CIA and the Sino-Indian war', revealed that Pakistani former president Ayub Khan had demanded Kashmir from the US in return for not attacking India during China-India war in 1962.

Riedel held that Pakistan was in best position to attack India in 1962 and the Indian army would have been reduced to splinters in the two sided attack by Pakistan and China.
According to the ex-CIA official, the then US president John F Kennedy played a decisive role in preventing the attack from Pakistan.
Kennedy and the then UK premier Harold Macmillan pressurised Pakistan saying if it attacks India then it will also be declared an invader like China, says Riedel.
The former CIA official observed that the main reason behind Pakistan not attacking India in 1962 was that Pakistan would have been left isolated by enraging US and UK.
According to the then US ambassador in India, Ayub Khan was fully opposed to US advice but when he was told that President Kennedy would make this request by writing him a letter then he became ready to lend his ears to it.

Riedel added Ayub laid the pre condition that US should promise to adopt a stern attitude against India on the Kashmir issue in return for it.
The book goes on to say, “If we look into it then Ayub Khan was saying US and Pakistan should jointly force India to hand over Kashmir to Pakistan.”

According to the book, Ayub made no promise with Kennedy and he also expressed his displeasure as the US supplied arms to India against China without informing Pakistan.
Ayub was of the view that the US breached a pact with Pakistan wherein it was laid down that despite a Chinese attack, US would not extend any military aid to India without the approval of Pakistan.

Ayub Khan started the 1965 war against India on his own but the arms supplied by US to India for using them against China led to failure in war.
Riedel further says in his book that US and UK had assured Pakistan they would find a solution to the Kashmir issue through dialogue with India after war.

“When Ayub Khan asked about it following the war, the then US ambassador replied to Washington that Nehru was absolutely split after India’s defeat at the hands of China and he was not enjoying such credibility in local politics that he could take any vital decision on the Kashmir issue.”

Ayub Khan missed opportunity for Kashmir’s freedom in 1962: ex-CIA official - thenews.com.pk

 

[Indus Pakistan]

Former Central Investigation Agency (CIA) official Bruce Riedel in his new book 'JFK's Forgotten Crisis: Tibet, the CIA and the Sino-Indian war', revealed that Pakistani former president Ayub Khan had demanded Kashmir from the US in return for not attacking India during China-India war in 1962.

Riedel held that Pakistan was in best position to attack India in 1962 and the Indian army would have been reduced to splinters in the two sided attack by Pakistan and China.
According to the ex-CIA official, the then US president John F Kennedy played a decisive role in preventing the attack from Pakistan.
Kennedy and the then UK premier Harold Macmillan pressurised Pakistan saying if it attacks India then it will also be declared an invader like China, says Riedel.
The former CIA official observed that the main reason behind Pakistan not attacking India in 1962 was that Pakistan would have been left isolated by enraging US and UK.
According to the then US ambassador in India, Ayub Khan was fully opposed to US advice but when he was told that President Kennedy would make this request by writing him a letter then he became ready to lend his ears to it.

Riedel added Ayub laid the pre condition that US should promise to adopt a stern attitude against India on the Kashmir issue in return for it.
The book goes on to say, “If we look into it then Ayub Khan was saying US and Pakistan should jointly force India to hand over Kashmir to Pakistan.”

According to the book, Ayub made no promise with Kennedy and he also expressed his displeasure as the US supplied arms to India against China without informing Pakistan.
Ayub was of the view that the US breached a pact with Pakistan wherein it was laid down that despite a Chinese attack, US would not extend any military aid to India without the approval of Pakistan.

Ayub Khan started the 1965 war against India on his own but the arms supplied by US to India for using them against China led to failure in war.
Riedel further says in his book that US and UK had assured Pakistan they would find a solution to the Kashmir issue through dialogue with India after war.

“When Ayub Khan asked about it following the war, the then US ambassador replied to Washington that Nehru was absolutely split after India’s defeat at the hands of China and he was not enjoying such credibility in local politics that he could take any vital decision on the Kashmir issue.”

Ayub Khan missed opportunity for Kashmir’s freedom in 1962: ex-CIA official - thenews.com.pk

Ayub is my hero. Ayub in my view is the best leader Pakistan has ever had. Ayub effectively laid the foundation on which Pakistan even today ticks. However the second greatest mistake made in Pakistan's history ( first being not invading Kashmir with regular Pak Army ditto India with Hyderabad Free state ) was by Ayub when he failed to attack India while the iron was hot in 1962 when India was running with tail inbetween*

Reason. My view the very thing that made Ayub so effective, a gentleman Sandhurst officer in mould of British officer class was dominated by overweening influence of the Anglo-Saxon world. In other words he paid way too much respect on them and trusted that if he did not attack they would extract Kashmir from India.

I believe that is why Ayub never forgave Kennedy because he felt he had "cheated him". Ayub was a soldier not a dirty, sny, sly, conniving politician.

And we lost Kashmir.

*Interesting thing is when we had our hands full with the Bengali insurgency in 1972 the Indian's did not waste a second as they "piggybacked" the Bengali's to whom we lost. We should have similarly used the Chinese in 1962.

 

[Shamain]

ayub khan was an ********* , what that loser had done to fatima jinnah . insertchoiceword here. that sod @##$%$## has tons of blunders on him also with regards to kashmir.

 

[rubyjackass]

Ayub was of the view that the US breached a pact with Pakistan wherein it was laid down that despite a Chinese attack, US would not extend any military aid to India without the approval of Pakistan.

Wow, to see how things have changed now. Pakistan should have taken the chance then. It would have changed India's trajectory dramatically, I mean more dramatically than it did after 1962.