What's new

Assam Run Over By Bangladeshis | The Debate With Arnab Goswami.

Why don't you see Pakistan as Bangladesh with an Army? Can't we see from the stats. the significant difference that concentrating on economic growth in relative peace with its neighbours has given Bangladesh better stats than India? Forget about floundering parts of south Asia, desperately looking for a winning lottery ticket.

It is increasingly unlikely that Bangladeshis will migrate; it was a condition in past years, no doubt about that, but things are improving rapidly.

Finally, where has that 20 million come from? What government sources? Even if it is true, it represents one and a half years of addition to the work-force. We have very serious problems on which to focus, before getting bogged down with the mythical Bangladeshi horde.

@Bilal9
@Philia
@Homo Sapiens

Why the deathly silence?

I see Bangladesh as an unarmed Pakistan because for most Indians (certainly me) Pakistan is the lead in overt militaristic state led hostility and religious fundamentalism fueled covert hostility towards Hindu dominant India.

So Bangladesh will always be compared using the Pakistan yardstick and not vice versa.

Also the not insignificant fact that Bangladesh was cleaved from Pakistan and not vice versa.

I see Pakistanis as Indian Muslims with an army.

I do not see Indian Muslims as Pakistanis without an army.

There is a world of difference between the two nazariyas.

Cheers, Doc
 
I see Bangladesh as an unarmed Pakistan because for most Indians (certainly me) Pakistan is the lead in overt militaristic state led hostility and religious fundamentalism fueled covert hostility towards Hindu dominant India.

So Bangladesh will always be compared using the Pakistan yardstick and not vice versa.

Also the not insignificant fact that Bangladesh was cleaved from Pakistan and not vice versa.

I see Pakistanis as Indian Muslims with an army.

I do not see Indian Muslims as Pakistanis without an army.

There is a world of difference between the two nazariyas.

Cheers, Doc

You didn't get it, Doc.

I was pointing out that left with no burden of upholding the Muslim ummah's rightful role in international society, Bangladesh avoided Pakistan's obsessive need to dominate India, concentrated on trade and commerce and did brilliantly well.

Saying that Pakistan was Bangladesh WITH an army was my clumsy, ill-worded attempt to point out that without that Army, Pakistan had the potential and displayed the ability to soar. Remember the pre-1965 stats, that @SoulSpokesman could get his friend to flash (a carefully chosen word, that) at the flare of a raincoat.

There is a world of difference between the two nazariyas, but you picked the wrong two. If you had picked Bangladesh and Pakistan, you might have been astonished. The Bangladeshis are likely to be the earliest on the sub-continent, next to Bhutan, to climb out of the poverty trap.
 
You didn't get it, Doc.

I was pointing out that left with no burden of upholding the Muslim ummah's rightful role in international society, Bangladesh avoided Pakistan's obsessive need to dominate India, concentrated on trade and commerce and did brilliantly well.

Saying that Pakistan was Bangladesh WITH an army was my clumsy, ill-worded attempt to point out that without that Army, Pakistan had the potential and displayed the ability to soar. Remember the pre-1965 stats, that @SoulSpokesman could get his friend to flash (a carefully chosen word, that) at the flare of a raincoat.

There is a world of difference between the two nazariyas, but you picked the wrong two. If you had picked Bangladesh and Pakistan, you might have been astonished. The Bangladeshis are likely to be the earliest on the sub-continent, next to Bhutan, to climb out of the poverty trap.

Can you tell me in private who @SoulSpokesman is?

Cheers, Doc
 
Can you tell me in private who @SoulSpokesman is?

Cheers, Doc

You don't know him personally.

He was very prominent, extreme right-wing, on PTH, but very well-liked by the Pakistani members there for his extremely caustic view of the Congress, and, incidentally, of the left-wing. He is a very close friend of Yasser Latif Hamdani, and that makes him say that he is the sole spokesman of the sole spokesman (YLH is an expert on the life and thinking of Mohammed Ali Jinnah) of the sole spokesman (the title of Ayesha Jalal's epochal book on Jinnah, which should be a must-read for all even slightly interested in sub-continental politics).

He is also a member of insaniyat, which now numbers eleven, and elicits very, very interesting responses.
 
It requires a heroic flight of fancy for an Indian to somehow accept that there are Indians moving to Bangladesh for livelihood and better prospects.
Doc there are illegal Indians in Bangladesh. The number might only be few hundred thousands compared to your 20 million illegal Bangladeshis. But nevertheless illegal Indians are here. So you find illegal Bangladeshis in India and we find Illegal Indians in BD so that we can conduct the population transfer.
 
Doc there are illegal Indians in Bangladesh. The number might only be few hundred thousands compared to your 20 million illegal Bangladeshis. But nevertheless illegal Indians are here. So you find illegal Bangladeshis in India and we find Illegal Indians in BD so that we can conduct the population transfer.

Did you not know that India is a highly developed paradise that all BD'shis strive to migrate to?
 
UKB,

Did you not know that India is a highly developed paradise that all BD'shis strive to migrate to?

No, not all BDs, only the poor ones- the ones who can do unskilled labour for the most part.

Regards
 
Good. Sooner we capture Assam the better. Karimganj, Kachar, Hailakandi districts belongs to Bangladesh anyway.

Good job Bangladeshis. :D :D

MissionNorthEast, going on full swing. Judging by the India media :lol:
 
Back
Top Bottom