What's new

Assad’s ‘victory’ — a disarmed, declawed Syria

.
Well, you are right to some extent. However, you can't blame the Syrian Baathist regime that much. Since they were put into power by the French government . They merely inherited and built on this power structure to this day. So France is also to be blamed to a lesser extent
Baath junta seized power on 8 March 1963, as result of military coup. Frenches have nothing to do with it.
 
.
Your regime committed the biggest ethnic cleansing and slaughter of Muslims in entire history:

DEwJKmNW0AEKge5.jpg
That's because of the saudi Qatari turkish western backed terrorist who used the cities and towns as battlefield
 
.
There is something weard in this thread the Anglo Saxon pigs with Zionists scum and Wahhabi dogs are supposed to be enemies but in this thread they have commen enemy which is the secular Assad government and they are openly mad because terrorists scum lost that's says and explain everything!
Salman.. the war is not finished yet. They will do crazy things, they will pump oil money in their new tactics because they invested too much in supporting the terrorists, so they will not easily give up. ISIS is not beaten completely and extremist rebels still have some areas under their control. There is no victory until their complete defeat which I hope follows fast.
 
.
Salman.. the war is not finished yet. They will do crazy things, they will pump oil money in their new tactics because they invested too much in supporting the terrorists, so they will not easily give up. ISIS is not beaten completely and extremist rebels still have some areas under their control. There is no victory until their complete defeat which I hope follows fast.
I do agree with you zio Wahhabi Anglo Saxon american terrorist alliance will not give up easily
 
.
I do agree with you zio Wahhabi Anglo Saxon american terrorist alliance will not give up easily

Since when have you become a Wilayat al-Faqih, Ba'athi, Russian fascist (Putin), Kurd (YPG) fanboy, Salman? As for the "Anglo-Saxon" nonsense, they are the biggest allies of Al-Assad as they could have removed him ages ago. Zionists too are more afraid of a Syria not ruled by the Al-Assad dynasty as Israel gained Syrian land (Golan Heights) under the incompetent rule of the Al-Assad dictatorship and Syria (read al-Assad regime) have done nothing to get their stolen land back. As for "Wahhabi" there is no such thing in existence. House of Saud do not want to see an MB-ruled Syria so their support for the Syrian opposition (laughable and extremely limited) was always more about pleasing the local people and Arab populace as a whole than any serious attempt of removing Bashar - a former friend whose family have even intermarried with the House of Saud. In fact it was private individuals and rich wealthy families that supported the Syrian opposition the most. If KSA (as in the state) had went all-in in Syria, Al-Assad would no longer be ruling.

The biggest supporters of the removal of Al-Assad have been the "MB-axis" (Qatar and Erdogan and allies). That's a fact.

BTW I support the Syrian Arab Army against ISIS and YPG (Kurdish land grabbers) but I support Syria and Syrians first and foremost against an illegal, failed and oppressing regime (Al-Assad regime) and that regime is bound to be removed eventually. They have been hijacking Syria for far too long and they used (historically) to even backstab fellow Ba'athis in Iraq and betray them aside from sponsoring terrorism (heavily) in Iraq post 2003. A failed trash regime. One just need to take a look at how they have ruined Syria in the past 6 years let alone previously. Syria could have been a larger Lebanon but they were doing even worse than a sanctioned Iraq under Saddam. A joke. The sooner this trash family is removed the better. Syrian and Arab nationalists will always have a big say in Syria due to the Syrian psyche and history. No need for Al-Assad in this regard.
 
Last edited:
.
I do agree with you zio Wahhabi Anglo Saxon american terrorist alliance will not give up easily
Dude, if we REALLY wanted Assad gone we would have intervened long ago and toppled him in a matter of weeks at most. lol He is not any stronger than Saddam or Qaddafi. The fact that he remained in power was due to the reticence of western powers to get into another conflict, the unpredictable outcome of what will happen after he is removed and other political reasons. It was never because Assad(or the resistance or whatever it's called) was too strong. lol
 
.
Dude, if we REALLY wanted Assad gone we would have intervened long ago and toppled him in a matter of weeks at most. lol He is not any stronger than Saddam or Qaddafi. The fact that he remained in power was due to the reticence of western powers to get into another conflict, the unpredictable outcome of what will happen after he is removed and other political reasons. It was never because Assad(or the resistance or whatever it's called) was too strong. lol
I know this but why you are going to war with Assad when this will make you look like aggressive invaders and the reason that you didn't overthrow the Assad regime because you want Syria and Syrians to destroy each other in long conflict without losing a single soldier because we know who benefits from Syria destruction
 
.
Only a Fool will say a man who destroyed his whole country and set it back by 30 years "won" anything. All this because of his greed for power. No man should be above a country, neither should ANY MAN rule a country for life (especially when the citizens are not even living a wealthy life like they should). We are mere mortals. Humans come and go but the country always remains. So why destroy your country just because of your greed for power? Should have left like Mubarak, Ben Ali etc did. Life continues,not the end of the world. Now look at Syria, the country WILL NEVER BE THE SAME AGAIN. Half its population(including the young/educated ones) have all migrated/seek refuge overseas and there is too much bad blood between Syrians today, all because of one single man. That's even considering he will ever fully control Syria again(which I don't think it's possible, even with Russian/Iranian, Hezbollah, all foriegn Shia fighters from the region etc).

So any talk of victory is laughable to be honest. There would never have been one if he handled things correctly and stepped down like any honourable leader that loves his country would have done instead of killing his own people for daring to rise up against him.

I just feel sorry for common Syrian people who will never have their country back again.


It was not only about stepping down. The only reason this war happened is because of Israel and USA. The zionists want to remove any group / party / country that is a threat to Israel. The biggest threat to Israel is actually Iran.. However, a direct attack from Israel on Iran would be suicide, since Israel is surrounded by Iranian allies.. Islamic Jihad and Hamas (Gaza), Hezbollah (Lebanon) and Assad (Syria).. These threats (Iranian allies) have to be removed from the table before Israel and USA can move on to take out the Iranian threat. The biggest problems of these threats is Syria ofcourse, because it is a country, not a group like Hezbollah and Hamas.. A direct attack from Israel on Syria would have resulted in a substantial long lasting war and a lot of casualties for the Israelis (not fighting a group but a country).. So they played it smart. Mossad and CIA tickled the starting of an uprising, forged ISIS out of the rebels and let their proxy fighters fight the war for them.

The Israeli/USA plan has succeeded partially.. They succeeded in destroying Syria.. BUT they could not predict the Russian move. The Russians intervened, because its in their interests to stop the growing dominance of USA.. Remember the Russians have a military base in Syria and its the only way to hold a position in the middle east. Simultaneously the Israeli/USA plan was thwarted, because Assad is still on the throne in Syria. Iran stil has Syria as its ally and on the contrary actually increased their influence. (Israel/USA hoped to diminish Iranian influence).

Israel already tried to remove the threat from Hezbollah in 2006 and every once in a couple of years they bomb Gaza to attack Hamas and Islamic Jihad.

Israel managed to weaken all three allies of Iran: Syria, Hezbollah and Hamas + Islamic Jihad. But the threats coming from these three has not been completely removed, so I am curious to see how things will move forward from now on. One thing is sure.. An attack on Iran is out of question as the threats have not been (entirely) dealt with. Actually the nuclear agreement mightve been a trick to halt Iran from manufacturing any nukes untill the aforementioned threats would have been dealt with (an interesting theory).

I think Israel's next move is to attack Hezbollah (ofcourse with the appropval of USA).. They will continue to weaken the Iranian allies / threats in their close surroundings.
 
.
Syrians will rebuilt their country again under leadership of Mr Assad and hopefully Russia / China and other nations will help them develop proper defensive mechanism to prevent another war

Nice to see Russians and Good guys won
hqdefault.jpg


maxresdefault.jpg


025ebdbd-ba56-41f3-8cce-5693aa011738.jpg


rtx36wd7.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
Only thing I learned from this conflict is that Assad is way too powerful, no amount of israeli cries can kick him out of his post as the sole leader of Syria.
 
.
Sounds like you are a teenager......lol

You jokers tried your hardest to topple Assad. the gulfy donkey's spent billions on arming training & infiltrating terrorists from all over the world, all under your watchful eye.

However, Iran and Russia fuc*** you up good!:omghaha:

Dude, if we REALLY wanted Assad gone we would have intervened long ago and toppled him in a matter of weeks at most. lol He is not any stronger than Saddam or Qaddafi. The fact that he remained in power was due to the reticence of western powers to get into another conflict, the unpredictable outcome of what will happen after he is removed and other political reasons. It was never because Assad(or the resistance or whatever it's called) was too strong. lol
 
.
It was not only about stepping down. The only reason this war happened is because of Israel and USA. The zionists want to remove any group / party / country that is a threat to Israel. The biggest threat to Israel is actually Iran.. However, a direct attack from Israel on Iran would be suicide, since Israel is surrounded by Iranian allies.. Islamic Jihad and Hamas (Gaza), Hezbollah (Lebanon) and Assad (Syria).. These threats (Iranian allies) have to be removed from the table before Israel and USA can move on to take out the Iranian threat. The biggest problems of these threats is Syria ofcourse, because it is a country, not a group like Hezbollah and Hamas.. A direct attack from Israel on Syria would have resulted in a substantial long lasting war and a lot of casualties for the Israelis (not fighting a group but a country).. So they played it smart. Mossad and CIA tickled the starting of an uprising, forged ISIS out of the rebels and let their proxy fighters fight the war for them.

The Israeli/USA plan has succeeded partially.. They succeeded in destroying Syria.. BUT they could not predict the Russian move. The Russians intervened, because its in their interests to stop the growing dominance of USA.. Remember the Russians have a military base in Syria and its the only way to hold a position in the middle east. Simultaneously the Israeli/USA plan was thwarted, because Assad is still on the throne in Syria. Iran stil has Syria as its ally and on the contrary actually increased their influence. (Israel/USA hoped to diminish Iranian influence).

Israel already tried to remove the threat from Hezbollah in 2006 and every once in a couple of years they bomb Gaza to attack Hamas and Islamic Jihad.

Israel managed to weaken all three allies of Iran: Syria, Hezbollah and Hamas + Islamic Jihad. But the threats coming from these three has not been completely removed, so I am curious to see how things will move forward from now on. One thing is sure.. An attack on Iran is out of question as the threats have not been (entirely) dealt with. Actually the nuclear agreement mightve been a trick to halt Iran from manufacturing any nukes untill the aforementioned threats would have been dealt with (an interesting theory).

I think Israel's next move is to attack Hezbollah (ofcourse with the appropval of USA).. They will continue to weaken the Iranian allies / threats in their close surroundings.
LOL yes I already heard that line before: "Arabs citizens who rose up against their tyrants was all a U.S Zionist conspiracy. " Arabs don't have brains, they are merely puppets according to some. :D

You are not saying anything new here unfortunately. :)

Sounds like you are a teenager......lol

You jokers tried your hardest to topple Assad. the gulfy donkey's spent billions on arming training & infiltrating terrorists from all over the world, all under your watchful eye.

However, Iran and Russia fuc*** you up good!:omghaha:
Calm down. As I said, if Western powers were REALLY keen on Assad to go by any means, we would have intervened long ago to topple him especially after the chemical attack . Western powers were wary of toppling him/going to yet another war and also for political reasons. That's the only thing that saved him. A simple no fly zone by the West like in Lybia would have been more than enough to remove him in a matter of weeks/month. I don't understand how you don't even get this.
Syrian rebels main supporters were Arab states(KSA, Qatar, gulf countries and Turkey to a lesser extent). We didn't really provide full military support we could have provided to the rebels. Our support was more diplomatic than military to be honest.
 
.
Syrians will rebuilt their country again under leadership of Mr Assad and hopefully Russia / China and other nations will help them develop proper defensive mechanism to prevent another war

Nice to see Russians and Good guys won
hqdefault.jpg


maxresdefault.jpg


025ebdbd-ba56-41f3-8cce-5693aa011738.jpg


rtx36wd7.jpg
Assadist terrorists slaughtered over 1 million people and expelled over 12 million. Yet still control barely 40% of Syria.

Only total lunatic can believe that after all this 2 million Alawis will continue to rule over 22 million Syria.
 
.
You really are 17 years old, aren't you?...........lol....joker mike 2000?......born in the year 2000?........lol

Joker, you think everybody else here is also 17 years old like you?

https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/201709241057647972-russia-mod-daesh-deir-ez-zor/

Iran knows well, who supports Daesh, and from day dot!.......stupid 17 year old joker.....lol

LOL yes I already heard that line before: "Arabs citizens who rose up against their tyrants was all a U.S Zionist conspiracy. " Arabs don't have brains, they are merely puppets according to some. :D

You are not saying anything new here unfortunately. :)


Calm down. As I said, if Western powers were REALLY keen on Assad to go by any means, we would have intervened long ago to topple him especially after the chemical attack . Western powers were wary of toppling him/going to yet another war and also for political reasons. That's the only thing that saved him. A simple no fly zone by the West like in Lybia would have been more than enough to remove him in a matter of weeks/month. I don't understand how you don't even get this.
Syrian rebels main supporters were Arab states(KSA, Qatar, gulf countries and Turkey to a lesser extent). We didn't really provide full military support we could have provided to the rebels. Our support was more diplomatic than military to be honest.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom