What's new

Arnab's Republic a reflection of what India has become- noisy and chaotic

Unfortunately I am not that good at judging people. I would rather wait for you and someone with good judgement skills to confirm who you are.
Then I must say that you have hard life ahead. Don't depend on other's judgments blindly:disagree:. That is how Bhakts came into existence. Think independently:agree:. You shall prosper
 
.
BJP funded, BJP owned & operated TV = Slush funds.
Never criticizes BJP, attacks only opposition.
 
. .
He is one of the most unbiased journalist in Indian media. Haters will keep hating :-), he should ignore them. Other than that, he needs to let his guests talk more and not repeat the same lines again and again while asking questions, which basically gives an escape route to the person being questioned.
 
.
Yeah he is back:enjoy:
arnab11.jpg
Rather enlightening that 'Pakistan bashing/anti-Pakistan rhetoric' in India is perceived to be an excellent way to pull in viewers.

Anti-Pakistan sells a lot more in India than Anti-India sells in Pakistan.
 
.
Nothing is eternal ; my friend

The Mighty and Invincible Gandhis are down in the dumps today

However India will always need RSS and BJP to "PROTECT"
Hindu Interests -- That is my Final point
Agreed, nothing is eternal. If Gandhis are down in the dumps today, don't you think even the Modis and Yogis will face a similar faith.

Whether India/Hindus need RSS/BJP is your personal opinion.
 
.
Agreed, nothing is eternal. If Gandhis are down in the dumps today, don't you think even the Modis and Yogis will face a similar faith.
Who ever it is if they dont perform well on the economic front they are on the way out. BJP would be very well be reminded that asimple nondescript onion was responsible for ending their rule. No gods or jingoism or even cows will save them.
 
. .
India's Bill O'Reilly....hope he stays scandal free...god i miss old bill.
 
.
In the last national elections with all the hullabaloo, all you were able to conjure was 31% votes of Indian populace and look at you, you are already on cloud 9. My advise, stay grounded

If you want it to be more than 50%, make it presidential system.

Play to win in whatever system there is.

You want to tell me that 31% is the approval/popularity rating of Modi and BJP right now?

Whether India/Hindus need RSS/BJP is your personal opinion.

Hence there is the avenue of democracy to allow all the personal opinions be voiced and see which prevails :D

Or maybe you prefer to live like the areas of the world where opinion on who rules and governs counts for nothing, no matter how prevalent it may be?
 
.
Dharma and Islam are incompatible. In fact exact opposites of each other.

Dharma means Haq and the closet to Aryans are Arab nations.

And we as a civilization are moving towards Dharma in India. This is despite BJP not because of it. They are just as useful/useless in the grand scheme of things.

Be it Congress or BJP its internal matter of Republic of India.

True. So when non Muslims hate you back, please don't cry. Accept the reality that your ideology is a polar opposite to ours and your faith reduces us to sub par citizens. Plus, we carry the burden of past experiences which are not too comforting for us non Muslims. Bottomline - there is not love lost between us. That is the harsh reality.

If its talk about freedom, liberation of holy sites and standing against colonization then Aryans and Muslims stand together. World peace is at stake because of the wrong policies which are even mentioned in holy scriptures.

*By you I don't mean 'Indian Muslims' in general. Just true Muslims who follow Islam. Most Indian Muslims engage in shirk almost on a daily basis, indulge in haram acts etc just like any non Muslim in India. My concern is the ideology, not the people so much.

Indian Muslims are Indians and Indians are being hated irrespective of thier religion aboard specially in EU. We Indians have never thought in racial terms but when we go aboard , we see the truth and reality in which we are Indians are hated no matter to which religion we belong and the same attitude is being applied towards Arabs, Turks, Africans.

Indeed your logic, you were the one who started out with this. Why cherry pick now? Well if Indian hindus are being tolerant towards Islamic prayer call of "There is no god except the One God" then aren't Indian muslims being tolerant to hindu worship of idols. So both are being tolerant to each other, its another thing that you wish to end this tolerance but rest easy. This country and its people survived despite your lot's hate filled bigotry and will continue to do so in future.

Aryans who are aware of thier ancient civilization and who are proud of thier traditions are well aware of the changes made by the Supreme Creator and which Avatar/prophet have teached what and what were the reasons behind in each era of those Avatars/Prophets.

You mean Hindutvas hate us back? Indeed Hindutva ideology is indeed opposite to secular ideology. I agree and in the very own words of your Guruji, your lot considers minorities as sub-par citizens.

Secularism is part of Indian nation but this secularism we Indians doesnt share with racists of other nations who doesnt respect Indian nation. We Indians have always respected other nations but when we are not respected and mistreated then Dharama Yudh/Jihad is born.
talwar-sword.jpg


The "foreign elements'' (Christians and Muslims) may "live at the mercy'' of the "national race (Aryan Hindus) as long as the national race may allow them to do so and to quit the country at the sweet will of the national race. That is the only sound view on the minorities' problem. That is the only logical and correct solution.
Source: The Hindu : Golwalkar and the BJP

May be Guruji forgot to mention the "Sickulars" among Hindus will be a road block for you but you are smart enough to understand that they should also be shown their place.

Who are at whose mercy , Indian nation is well aware.

Containers are not just being sent to other nations without knowing thier national foreign policy towards Indian nation.


Because that's a muslim belief? You are free to not believe it.

And going by your logic, you placing and worshiping idols are also distasteful and disgusting to muslims since they abhor idol worship yet they TOLERATE IT

So the feeling is mutual you see:agree:

Colonization is the problem because of which many problems and changes have occured inside Indian nation.

$_1.JPG

6-Tibet-Tibetan-Silver-Ganesh-Lord-font-b-Ganesha-b-font-Elephant-God-Buddha-Statue-font.jpg
195N09007_749HD.jpg

Vishu-Greetings111.jpg


Yup...thousands of temples destroyed and mosques built over them sort of spit on your argument.
I am yet to find one mosque destroyed by Hindus, unfortunately the opposite side has destroyed tens of thousands of temples!

So again you want to talk about Ghori and Ghaznavi ?
 
Last edited:
.
You look too overconfident. OK let's have Presidential style elections then of course with debates. May be modi can whip Pappu's @ss, but if he takes on Kejriwal/Tharoor/Nitish etc he will literally be roasted, No wonder he ran away from Thapar's interview and continues to be elusive to any counter-questioning from journalists expect his pets.

Since you are so intent on Presidential style elections, why not initiate it since your beloved leader and party is in power. At least drop hints and create a buzz, Let's see your party/Leader's guts.

Presidential elections are done according to the Indian Constitution

Article 52 states that there shall be a President of India. The executive powers of the Union shall be vested in the President. He, as the head of a state, symbolises the nation. In some democratic systems, the head of the state is also the head of the government and, therefore, he will also be the head of the political executive.

The President of India is the first citizen and represents the Indian nation and does not, therefore, belong to any particular political party. He is elected by the representatives of the people through an Electoral College.

Article 54 of the constitution says:

"The President shall be elected by the members of an electoral college consisting of -

(a) The elected members of both Houses of Parliament and

(b) The elected members of the Legislative Assemblies of the States (including National Capital Territory of Delhi and the Union Territory of Pondicherry vide the Constitution 70th amendment Act, 1992)."

Thus in the election of the President the citizens play no direct part and he is elected indirectly by the representatives or the people. Another point of difference that may be noted is that the election of the President of India is by the system of proportional representation, by the single transferable vote, as provided by Article 55(3) of the Constitution.

Election of the President can be held even if some seats in the Electoral College are vacant. Such election cannot be called in question on the ground of any vacancy existing for whatever reasons, among the members of the Electoral College electing a person either as President or Vice-President. Further, a President in office can change the composition of the Electoral College by dissolving one or more hostile Legislative Assemblies under Article 172(1) or 174(26) or under 356(1) of the Constitution of India.

Article 71(4), therefore, may be construed as repugnant to the purposes embodied in Article 55(4). Further, Article 55 is conspicuously silent on whether there will be representation of all or each State in the Presidential election, although there is vacancy in the electoral College. It only provides for "the different States." Since there is no guarantee to ensure non-vacancy in the Presidential Electoral College, the phrase, "the elected members of Legislative Assemblies of States" means only those who are actually in office at the time of Presidential Election.

The Constitution also provides for weighting of votes in the election of the President based on two fundamental principles. First, to secure as far as possible, uniformity in the scale of representation of different States of the Union, which emphasises the similarity in the status of the States of the Union. And secondly, to secure parity between the States as a whole and the Union in order to work up the idea of federal compact. For the purpose of securing such uniformity and parity the following method is laid down. this method makes the Presidential election complicated.
 
.
You look too overconfident. OK let's have Presidential style elections then of course with debates. May be modi can whip Pappu's @ss, but if he takes on Kejriwal/Tharoor/Nitish etc he will literally be roasted, No wonder he ran away from Thapar's interview and continues to be elusive to any counter-questioning from journalists expect his pets.
I dont think that you understand the concept of presidential system debates. The presidential debates are between presidential candidates and not the whole parties. Modi will be debating with Rahul Gandhi only. The Kejriwals. Tharoor Nitishs will be taken care by other leaders.

BTW who says Modi cant take on Kejriwal Tharoor and Nitish

Kejriwal will do his nautanki "I am an IIT engineer I can hack EVMs." "Degree Dikhao Modiji" "LG aur Modi hamain kaam nahi karne de rahe". Do you think that this nautanki will help him win a presidential debate? Maybe he will win laughter challenge but not a debate

I would love to see Tharoor mouth lines like "Exasperating farrago of distortions, misrepresentations & outright lies being broadcast by an unprincipled showman masquerading as a journalst" and try and win debates

Toe to Toe Nitish would be a good competitor to Modi in development but then he has a big baggage of Lalu and "Secularism" (Bihar ki Beti Ishrat Jahan)

Since you are so intent on Presidential style elections, why not initiate it since your beloved leader and party is in power. At least drop hints and create a buzz, Let's see your party/Leader's guts.

The basic structure doctrine of the constitution does not allow a formal change to the presidential system. But Modi is dropping hints and working towards a quasi presidential system with simultaneous elections to Lok Sabha and State Assemblies. All elections will then be fought on a National Platform. that is why the regional parties are opposing this

I still maintain that Modi missed a trick by not calling Delhi Elections along with the Lok Sabha. Maybe the result would have been 67-3 in support of BJP. On the other hand giving Keriwal the reigns of power of a quasi state has exposed him in front of the world and now he is unable to even win a municipal election even with a 10 year anti incumbency against the BJP
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom