What's new

Army is fighting a war, and not terrorism, in J&K

i have only one question to all such terrorists...
they said they are fighting for Kashmiris and kashmiriyat... So after the devastating floods and entire breakdown of the nimble economy and stability of peoples life, how are the attacks beneficial for kashmiriyat???

Its clear that they talk something and do something else.. a typical hypocrite... if they were really thinking abt kashmiris then they would have aided in returning to normalcy for people of J&K whose lives are devastated by floods.. They needed rebuilding not AK47 bullets grenades and suicide attacks.. All such so called Terrorist are not doing anything good for J&K rather they are proving to be dogs following masters order. A master who can never distinguish what is the pain of losing lives in natural calamity.
 
Why cant indian side stop whining. blame your un prepared Ness on others. They are living Iin kadhmir for god sake they should know all this and stop crying a rive r.
its your enemy on other side.BE PREPARED OR BE DEAD.
dont playbthis card its annoying get up toughen up and fight like a soldier be prepared all the time.
 
Indian Army is fighting to supress Muslims standing up for freedom from Hindu India. Its Jalianwala Baagh and the Indian Army is playing the British Army.

Pakistan army is fighting the freedom of Wahabi Muslims in the NWFP areas who are standing up for freedom from Pakistan which sold out its Islamic State ideals to the west. It's Afghanistan and the Pakistani army is playing the role of the United States occupation forces.

As a matter of curiosity, if the mirror is reflected towards India's western neighbor, can the same statement not apply ?:undecided:
 
Its understandable in a country and culture where there is no films no industries no sporting events terrorism is the only employer and source of entertainment.
 
Its understandable in a country and culture where there is no films no industries no sporting events terrorism is the only employer and source of entertainment.

What No Films,Industries,Sport ? :cheesy:

Are you from Mars :partay:

Such a Foolish Statement :crazy: Another rajnikanth movie fan :enjoy:
 
How many are these innocent civilians who are targetted by the Indian police and the army and then labelled as terrorists for Indian soldiers to show how brave and strong they are?
 
Indian Army is fighting to supress Muslims standing up for freedom from Hindu India. Its Jalianwala Baagh and the Indian Army is playing the British Army.

Quit playing a bigot yaar.. Its unlike of you!!
 
The Indian Media speed to Blame Pakistan for any mishap is faster then RAW/Indian army officers.:crazy:
I think most of the RAW Agents Watch TV to decide whether it is pakistan or not :woot:


Pathetic:enjoy:
 
No substance in the article at all except for the three prominent attacks recently and the civilian toll in recent years. The author is also showing some uncanny smokescreen. To be honest, the Uri attack was an embarassment if not a setback for the army. The terrorists were able to take down high number of army jawans. Besides some jawans(4 according to one report) were reportedly killed in friendly-fire as well. It shows the weaknesses in the interoperability of armed force units and also the bad screening protocol followed at the entry to the base. There should be a thorough investigation on the incident and the gaps should be addressed. After 25 years of experience of fighting the insurgency, if there are still Uri-like death toll, it raises questions about the training IA gives its soldiers.

I dont agree with you completely bcoz the whole operation is completed in 6 hrs and this the same Lakshars we saw in Mumbai . Also 4 soilders died due to fire in the ration not by the terrorist but i have to agree with you on the lapses which led the infiltration of these guys
 
I dont agree with you completely bcoz the whole operation is completed in 6 hrs and this the same Lakshars we saw in Mumbai . Also 4 soilders died due to fire in the ration not by the terrorist but i have to agree with you on the lapses which led the infiltration of these guys
Mumbai took 3 days because there were hostages involved and also terrorists were holed up in a 400 room hotel with multiple corridors. Army was not on standby as in J&K. Compared to that the ground in Uri is relatively open. The fire was unfortunate. But even without that the death toll is high. As I said, the most alarming part is the friendly-fire.
 
India needs to bring more army in Kashmir and put curfew in place for all 364 days to fight this war better.
 
For the past six months Pakistan is using the Lashkar-e-Tayiba and other terrorist groups to launch frontal attacks on Indian security forces and assets instead of aimlessly targeting civilians. The sooner all of us understand this, the better it is.
The last three attacks on Indian assets -- one in Afghanistan and two in Jammu and Kashmir -- are a clear demonstration of Pakistan's last throw of dice in sending highly-trained and motivated fidayeen to specifically target the Indian Army and other security forces.
The first instance took place three days before Narendra Modi was to be sworn in as prime minister on May 26. The target was India's consulate in Afghanistan's Herat.
A Lashkar-e-Tayiba hit squad was assigned to take hostages and lay siege at the Indian consulate. The LeT hit-squad, highly trained, heavily armed and intensely motivated, seemed to have come prepared for a long haul. Security sources said each of the four attackers carried AK-47 rifles and six magazines each.
Two of them also carried under barrel grenade launchers or UGBLs and rocket propelled grenades or RPGs. Each also carried fruits, nearly half a kg of dry fruits and water bottles.

The Herat attack and the last two attempts to push in terrorists into the Kashmir valley have uncanny similarities. In both the attacks last week, terrorists had come equipped for a prolonged fight and were eventually prepared to die.
This is a new breed of fidayeen Pakistan has invested in.
On the night of December 1, half a dozen terrorists tried to infiltrate the Tootmari gali in the Naugam sector at an altitude of 14,000 feet. The army killed all six and recovered huge 'war-like' stores right on the Shamshabari range.
All six terrorists fought for 12 hours and were equipped with high-end gadgets and sophisticated equipment including military grade snow suits and boots. Their communication equipment too was state-of the art.
The dramatic attack on the Uri military camp on Friday, December 5, was more audacious and planned to inflict maximum damage to security forces. Again, the group was heavily armed (each man was carrying 10 magazines of AK-47) and were ready to die.
That all six 'bent-on-suicide' terrorists were eliminated with six hours is testimony to the Indian Army's preparedness although it did suffer initial reverses.

Since November, a subtle shift in the tactics has been noticed by security managers. Initially, there were three attempts to plant massive Improvised Explosive Devices to target army patrols along the Line of Control in the Tangdhar sector of the Kashmir valley.
All were fortunately thwarted by a combined effort of intelligence and security agencies. Similarly, the recovery of a huge cache of 18 brand new AK-47 rifles and half a dozen pistols in the third week of November indicated a concerted attempt to arm those terrorists already inside J&K.
What has prompted this change in tactic on Pakistan's part?
Pakistan has clearly realised that the well-knit security grid in the J&K hinterland did not allow any space for terrorists to target the civilian population.
As violence levels fell dramatically between 2011 and 2013 (less than 40 civilians were killed in those years as against about 100 killings on an average in the previous three years) and the security forces gained an upper hand, the effectiveness of Pakistan's 20-year old tactic of pushing in terrorists to disrupt peace in Jammu & Kashmir was giving diminishing returns.
Many of these terrorists were being intercepted and eliminated on the LoC itself. The multi-layered security grid refined over the years and involving the army, the Central Reserve Police Force and the J&K police, killed around 80 terrorists every year since 2011. More than 90 terrorists have been neutralised till November this year.
The high turnout of voters in the first two phases of the J&K assembly election was perhaps the signal for those in charge of Kashmir policy in the Pakistan army to shift gears
. They could not let Kashmir fall off the map. Something dramatic needed to be triggered to once again bring Kashmir back into focus.
Last weekend's attacks launched almost simultaneously was in keeping with this shift. That all three attacks (Uri, Srinagar and Tral) were nipped in the bud is a tribute to the Indian Army's commitment to keep Kashmir peaceful even if it means paying a very heavy cost to itself.

Army is fighting a war, and not terrorism, in J&K - Rediff.com India News
Yes they are highly motivated and trained but not by us we are busy with TTP these days not going to waste time on other things.
 
This article is so full of shit that it stinks. The time and energy you guys waste on false propaganda against Pakistan, if used on productive activities can make you a super power.

Well, don't take the last part seriously, just saying.


For the past six months Pakistan is using the Lashkar-e-Tayiba and other terrorist groups to launch frontal attacks on Indian security forces and assets instead of aimlessly targeting civilians. The sooner all of us understand this, the better it is.
The last three attacks on Indian assets -- one in Afghanistan and two in Jammu and Kashmir -- are a clear demonstration of Pakistan's last throw of dice in sending highly-trained and motivated fidayeen to specifically target the Indian Army and other security forces.
The first instance took place three days before Narendra Modi was to be sworn in as prime minister on May 26. The target was India's consulate in Afghanistan's Herat.
A Lashkar-e-Tayiba hit squad was assigned to take hostages and lay siege at the Indian consulate. The LeT hit-squad, highly trained, heavily armed and intensely motivated, seemed to have come prepared for a long haul. Security sources said each of the four attackers carried AK-47 rifles and six magazines each.
Two of them also carried under barrel grenade launchers or UGBLs and rocket propelled grenades or RPGs. Each also carried fruits, nearly half a kg of dry fruits and water bottles.

The Herat attack and the last two attempts to push in terrorists into the Kashmir valley have uncanny similarities. In both the attacks last week, terrorists had come equipped for a prolonged fight and were eventually prepared to die.
This is a new breed of fidayeen Pakistan has invested in.
On the night of December 1, half a dozen terrorists tried to infiltrate the Tootmari gali in the Naugam sector at an altitude of 14,000 feet. The army killed all six and recovered huge 'war-like' stores right on the Shamshabari range.
All six terrorists fought for 12 hours and were equipped with high-end gadgets and sophisticated equipment including military grade snow suits and boots. Their communication equipment too was state-of the art.
The dramatic attack on the Uri military camp on Friday, December 5, was more audacious and planned to inflict maximum damage to security forces. Again, the group was heavily armed (each man was carrying 10 magazines of AK-47) and were ready to die.
That all six 'bent-on-suicide' terrorists were eliminated with six hours is testimony to the Indian Army's preparedness although it did suffer initial reverses.

Since November, a subtle shift in the tactics has been noticed by security managers. Initially, there were three attempts to plant massive Improvised Explosive Devices to target army patrols along the Line of Control in the Tangdhar sector of the Kashmir valley.
All were fortunately thwarted by a combined effort of intelligence and security agencies. Similarly, the recovery of a huge cache of 18 brand new AK-47 rifles and half a dozen pistols in the third week of November indicated a concerted attempt to arm those terrorists already inside J&K.
What has prompted this change in tactic on Pakistan's part?
Pakistan has clearly realised that the well-knit security grid in the J&K hinterland did not allow any space for terrorists to target the civilian population.
As violence levels fell dramatically between 2011 and 2013 (less than 40 civilians were killed in those years as against about 100 killings on an average in the previous three years) and the security forces gained an upper hand, the effectiveness of Pakistan's 20-year old tactic of pushing in terrorists to disrupt peace in Jammu & Kashmir was giving diminishing returns.
Many of these terrorists were being intercepted and eliminated on the LoC itself. The multi-layered security grid refined over the years and involving the army, the Central Reserve Police Force and the J&K police, killed around 80 terrorists every year since 2011. More than 90 terrorists have been neutralised till November this year.
The high turnout of voters in the first two phases of the J&K assembly election was perhaps the signal for those in charge of Kashmir policy in the Pakistan army to shift gears
. They could not let Kashmir fall off the map. Something dramatic needed to be triggered to once again bring Kashmir back into focus.
Last weekend's attacks launched almost simultaneously was in keeping with this shift. That all three attacks (Uri, Srinagar and Tral) were nipped in the bud is a tribute to the Indian Army's commitment to keep Kashmir peaceful even if it means paying a very heavy cost to itself.

Army is fighting a war, and not terrorism, in J&K - Rediff.com India News
 
No substance in the article at all except for the three prominent attacks recently and the civilian toll in recent years. The author is also showing some uncanny smokescreen. To be honest, the Uri attack was an embarassment if not a setback for the army. The terrorists were able to take down high number of army jawans. Besides some jawans(4 according to one report) were reportedly killed in friendly-fire as well. It shows the weaknesses in the interoperability of armed force units and also the bad screening protocol followed at the entry to the base. There should be a thorough investigation on the incident and the gaps should be addressed. After 25 years of experience of fighting the insurgency, if there are still Uri-like death toll, it raises questions about the training IA gives its soldiers.

I agree completely with this.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom