What's new

Anti-Nazism Resolution Passes In UNGA, Despite US And Ukraine Opposition

.
Majority of the countries that abstained are surprisingly EU countries, I never thought that they would "abstain" from a UN resolution against racism and racist ideologies but apparently they did.

Remember the far right parties are gaining strength and local and regional leaders are appeasing them. Also these wars in Middle East and refugees are just fueling more fire, and global growth slowing down is allowing these forces to point fingers.

And Jews should be afraid cause they will not be spared along with Muslims and other minorities.
 
.
nazis are in every religion and in every community .
 
. . .
So much for the theory that Jews control the US. Notice Israel is green in the OP picture while the US is red. We'll see how long it takes PDF to forget this:

Screen Shot 2019-11-10 at 5.05.08 AM.jpg

Screen Shot 2019-11-10 at 5.05.19 AM.jpg



why did US vote against it ? ? :what:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-votes-against-anti-nazi-resolution-at-united-nations/

"We condemn without reservation all forms of religious and ethnic intolerance or hatred at home and around the world," said Deputy U.S. Representative to the Economic and Social Council Stefanie Amadeo, explaining the U.S. vote.

"However, due to this resolution's overly narrow scope and politicized nature, and because it calls for unacceptable limits on the fundamental freedom of expression, the United States cannot support it," Amadeo said.

"This resolution's recommendations to limit freedom of expression, freedom of association, and the right to peaceful assembly contravene the principles enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and must be opposed," Amadeo said.
 
Last edited:
. . .
India backstabbing her US ally once again.

LOL look at the abstainers. Hypocrites.
 
. . .
US has to appease its large and growing Alt-right(fancy name for Nazi scums) movement who obviously consider Trump as the Fuhrer.



They indeed create "fancy alternative names" in their media for their racist scum POS organizations, ideologies and personalities instead of using one authentic "term" to name and shame them. It is all part of their politics and in a way they "support" these types of racist scum primitive monkeys, the so-called fancy "alt-right", "far-right", "nationalist", "conservative", "ultraconservative" and other such BS deceptive fancy terms used for them.

Well, Hitler himself drew inspiration from pure racist ideology of the Southern USA and British Empire. So - no surprise here.

The real inventor of "racism", "white nationalism" etc. are the countries where "English" is spoken and where the British/English people settled like USA, Canada, Australia, South Africa etc. If you read their literature about British India, you would realize that these British/English were so race obsessed even during 1800s when they were writing their "official books" and "gazettes" and invented first time the crazy terms like "Aryan languages of India" and "finest forms of Aryan race" regarding various peoples settled in south asia based on their "concept of race". These British/English/Anglo-Saxon have always been spreading the BS about Aryan racism and consider themselves the finest specimen of that race.
 
.
Very telling if is not against Nazis, then same for Israelis, so Nazism could be their own creation?

I mean think about it what means of cross checking existed to verify what governments were saying in 1940s. So just like false flags today. Mossad, CIA, MI6 easily could have propogated Holocaust false flag as real. Even today when we have independant investigators and twitter etc it is hard to know truth.

Just a theory.
A conspiracy theory maybe.

But US voting against it is a very chilling reality.
 
. .
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-votes-against-anti-nazi-resolution-at-united-nations/

"We condemn without reservation all forms of religious and ethnic intolerance or hatred at home and around the world," said Deputy U.S. Representative to the Economic and Social Council Stefanie Amadeo, explaining the U.S. vote.

"However, due to this resolution's overly narrow scope and politicized nature, and because it calls for unacceptable limits on the fundamental freedom of expression, the United States cannot support it," Amadeo said.

"This resolution's recommendations to limit freedom of expression, freedom of association, and the right to peaceful assembly contravene the principles enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and must be opposed," Amadeo said.
That's the point of the resolution. It is to limit the freedom of expression to be a Nazi, limit the freedom of association with Nazis, and limit right to peaceful assembly of Nazis. If you have a problem with that then there really isn't much to discuss.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom