What's new

Anger as Internet hate-mongers spew venom against Kashmir

:lol:

Native Muslims?

With surnames like Dar, Lone, Pandit, Wangoo, Raina, Lakshmanjoo, Bhatt, Dhar, Wani etc?

That's funny.
And all of them are native Muslims
and add to that list Sheikh and Khwaja :-)
 
.
seriously now, a commentary on social media commentary ? :disagree:

what people are saying on twitter really shouldn't be news.

thats why ISIS twitter accounts are getting blocked for hate and violence speech which indians are endorsing on their own civilians. Indians on twitter are not any better then those terrorists sympathizers.
 
.
@AgNoStiC MuSliM Read Care fully

NR004772-page-002.jpg
 
. . .
.
There are multiple UNSC Resolutions on Kashmir after 1947 that both India and Pakistan committed to - it is those resolutions and commitments that India is violating, and Pakistan is adhering to.

Care to post them here?
 
.
@NKVD

Oh, and to save you some time from reading, the excerpt you highlighted does not reference Regular Pakistani military forces (at the time the UN was not aware that regular Pakistani military was present in J&K).

That is why subsequent resolutions specifically mention 3 entities:
1. Tribesmen
2. Pakistani nationals
3. Pakistani troops

Care to post them here?
Read the thread I referenced:
https://defence.pk/threads/pakistan...agreement-sources.392233/page-11#post-7533725
 
.
In Aug Many Clashes reported Among Sunnis and shia on in whic 3 houses burn by Spratis

https://defence.pk/threads/shias-and-sunnis-clash-in-indian-kashmir.444368/


Pakistan violated it first in 1947 Why we care Now ??

So apparently they were best buddies while playing cricket but then became Shia and Sunni after arguments?

"The clashes broke out in Wargam village this afternoon following an altercation between two groups of youth while playing cricket, another police official said."

Plz tell Ur planners to stop watching too much of Indian soap serials.
 
.
Oh, and to save you some time from reading, the excerpt you highlighted does not reference Regular Pakistani military forces (at the time the UN was not aware that regular Pakistani military was present in J&K).

That is why subsequent resolutions specifically mention 3 entities:
1. Tribesmen
2. Pakistani nationals
3. Pakistani troops
+++Sir, Read It carefully UN mentioned Specially any forces which came in For fighting Purposes Which Includes PA as well in lay man term

Sir I duly respect Please Don't Try to Impose you Idea on Us we Know exactly what We state That's Reason Our Diplomacy Never failed in International forums in related to Kashmir

PDF is Just Forum of Military Enthusiast Proving here something Din't change things on ground

TC
 
.
thats why ISIS twitter accounts are getting blocked for hate and violence speech which indians are endorsing on their own civilians. Indians on twitter are not any better then those terrorists sympathizers.
c189774626f6d42fa73d48c565e7f4e1.jpg
 
.
Anger as Internet hate-mongers spew venom against Kashmir


Kashmiri Pandits taking lead in demonizing Valleyites


Ever since the current spate of unrest in Kashmir, lakhs of Indian users on social media have declared an online war against Kashmiris with trolling and abusing becoming a common affair.
When late BJP leader Pramod Mahajan’s son Rahul Mahajan posted a small survey on twitter with a question: “What should army use in Kashmir?”, 3573 of his followers participated in the survey. Of them 76 percent voted for real gun, 19 percent for pellet gun, three percent for sticks and two percent for stones.
The survey angered Kashmiris who saw it. One user posted the snapshot of the survey with a comment: “How Indian nation endorses violence and incites Indian army to shoot civilians in #Kashmir Shameful! (sic).”
Kashmiri social media users say that the hate has been increasing to alarming levels. Even people termed as intellectuals and with large following on social media have been happily jumping on the bandwagon.
As people demanded talks on Kashmir, Madhu Kishwar, an academic and writer recently wrote on her twitter account, “Talk of political dialogue in Kashmir utter idiocy. Dialogue with 10 year old brainwashed kids using acid bombs & stones to kill & maim?”
Rightwing Kashmiri Ashok Pandit, who is known for posting extreme views, recently wrote in response to an article on Burhan Wani, “Its violence perpetrated by journalists paid to make heroes out of trrsts, & villains out of security forces. Shame (sic).”
Not to be left behind, another Pandit, Dr Ajay Chrungoo wrote, “JK CM: Y children r taken 2 security frcs camps & police stations, & made shields..Islamo-fascism uses child shields & kid soldiers routinely.” He even questioned Northern Army Commander Lt Gen D S Hooda for advocating talks. “‘StepBack’ Army commander Huda’s advice 4 separatists, security forces and d govt. Does he know what stepping back of forces & d govts means? (sic)” tweeted Chrungoo.
Former BJP leader Prof Hari Om while harping on the old gimmick of Muslims controlling everything in Kashmir wrote on twitter, “#KashMuslims control office of CM, dominate secretariat, swamp all other pol-administrative & financial institutions. What more do they want?”
At times the social media storm has also fuelled rumours. Recently another Pandit, Rajesh Kher, owner of KongPosh music, tried to whip up communal harmony when he uploaded a video on Facebook claiming it to be showing attack on Martand temple. The video was shared hundreds of times and invited 1000s of comments often attacking Kashmiri Muslims. After some Kashmiri Pandits and Muslims denounced the veracity of the video, Kher promptly removed the video and changed his display picture too.
In addition to some known names, tens of thousands of social media users often swarm media sites, Greater Kashmir included, and post hateful comments on almost every story depicting human rights violations. There is always a high degree of chance that if a common Kashmiri writes his heart out on the current situation that he will see his profile barraged by the hateful comments and allegations of sedition.
Many local social media users feel that their voice has been choked both offline and online. “See any Kashmir related hashtag on twitter and check the hateful comments. They have the numerical strength and on the basis of it they try to portray Kashmiris as terrorists and hate-mongers,” said a social media user.
The observers trace the origin of extreme hate engulfing social media after 2014 floods, when comments like “cleanse Kashmir of the Muslims, make Kashmir satisar etc was common.” Today social media users from outside the state justify killings, pellets, curfew and all sorts of violence used on unarmed civilians. Only a minority advocates peaceful means like talks to end the unrest and they too find themselves barraged with hateful comments.
After a Kashmiri woman tried to confront Mahajan on the twitter for his Kashmir rant and the violence-encouraging survey, the later responded: “I don’t deserve anything madam but tomorrorrow morning pellet gun is waiting for you.”
WHAT SHOULD ARMY USE IN KASHMIR?
STONES: 2 %
STICKS: 3 %
PELLET GUN: 19 %
REAL GUN: 76 %
(A SURVEY ON TWITTER IN INDIA)
http://m.greaterkashmir.com/news/kashmir/story/226744.html


What is the new to it? Sunni Muslims in Kashmir valley any way do not like India...So how does it matter if they are more angry for something when Kashmir of other view point are contesting their views.
 
.
So apparently they were best buddies while playing cricket but then became Shia and Sunni after arguments?

"The clashes broke out in Wargam village this afternoon following an altercation between two groups of youth while playing cricket, another police official said."

Plz tell Ur planners to stop watching too much of Indian soap serials.

Sirji I am Kashmiri Myself Don't tell me what I Know Sitting on tabloid in Pakistan you have to google Every thing Here not Us

MY district Budgam is Shia majority I Know things here very well
 
.
The more rational and feasible solution is for Indian to stop violating its commitment to implement the UNSC Resolutions on Kashmir and engage in negotiations with Pakistan and the UN to conduct an impartial plebiscite in all of disputed J&K that will let the people decide.
Not while pakistan is sponsoring terrorism. As UNSC noted, all parties need to be able to participate freely for impartial plebiscite. That is why UNSC asked pakistan to withdraw its regular and irregular forces. I am not sure why pakistan didn't fulfill preconditions, may be it thought it would lose plebiscite as NC had very good hold back then and it was pro-India but anti-Hari Singh. With Nehru removing Hari Sing and making senior senior Abdulla incharge, there was very good chance that plebiscite would have been in India's favor. That is the only reason that could have been pakistan chickening out of plebiscite.

he meant Hindus angered by Kashmiris
so hindus get angered by venom against kashmiris online?
 
.
Sirji I am Kashmiri Myself Don't tell me what I Know Sitting on tabloid in Pakistan you have google very thing Here not Us

MY district Budgam is Shia majority I Know things here very well

Dear Sir, first of all the Shia-Sunni divide aint a secret and no one is denying it but if facts are presented in front of U then plz do consider that. When it comes to Kashmir issue, both Shia and Sunnis are alike and same is the case in AJK.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom