An Unnecessary Defense Pact

[Ideas_R_Bulletproof]

Are anti semitic conspiracy theories in the 'Islamic world' hatched by western propagandists ?

the Jews lived under Islam for more than 1,000 years (from 637AD to 1099 and again, from 1187 to 1918) without anyone complaining.... the Christians captured in 1099 and massacred most people.... is that publicised?.... no.... only those are publicised that serve Western interests.... since 1918 (officially 1948), because of the creation of Israel by Western states, the Jews are facing an existential threat (from Muslims) once again.... but Western states have prevented Muslim states from eliminating Israel (by keeping them divided).... that makes Israel fulfill its Western geopolitical purpose... as long as Israel exists, Muslims around the world are distracted from Western powers....

this is geopolitics.... conspiracy theories is not fodder for geopoliticians...
those are for "debaters".... debaters debate, whereas geopoliticians rule....

 

[Gandh brandi]

Such as ?

The author meant we already buy Chinese arms which are relatively advanced against Indian indigenous weapons. Blame Congress's "NAM" policy for that. Even NAM member Yugoslavia made weapons.

 

[aryadravida_exmuslim]

If Swami is an expert, I'm Illuminati.

 

[T-Rex]

Thanks God! Only 2% traitors.

Only 2% controlling 98%, is that something to be thankful of? It also shows how clever and determined the 2% are and how unworthy the 98% are.

 

[ebr77]

I have 2question about so called defence co operation MOU......or India's motive with BD--
1. If India wants to portray themselves as so friendly country then why don't they have open border with us, rather they want to seal the border and shoots at us?
2. If there is a future war with Myanmar ( totally unrealistic) , will India be with us?

 

[Tshering22]

I have 2question about so called defence co operation MOU......or India's motive with BD--

1. If India wants to portray themselves as so friendly country then why don't they have open border with us, rather they want to seal the border and shoots at us?

Open border policy is not for everyone. There is a certain strategic equation not reached yet between the two of us. There is enough trouble without opening borders with smugglers and traffickers.

2. If there is a future war with Myanmar ( totally unrealistic) , will India be with us?[/QUOTE]

We were with you when you needed your own country, weren't we?

 

[Nilgiri]

1. If India wants to portray themselves as so friendly country then why don't they have open border with us, rather they want to seal the border and shoots at us?

Because too many illegal immigrants come from your side to our side....and put a fiscal burden on already scarce situation (regarding jobs, resources, welfare etc).....stuff that any country must put for its own citizens first.

We can be much more friendly when this issue is sorted out. Sealed border will actually help the friendship grow.

Because a sealed border means only Bangladeshis that we have judged to be friends are allowed to visit/immigrate to India....i.e everything done legally.

2. If there is a future war with Myanmar ( totally unrealistic) , will India be with us?

India will probably be neutral, as will China. This unrealistic war will also be a short localised one that changes little on the ground if it happens by some freak misfortune.

India and China would rather do their work to ensure such a war (between BD and MM) never happens. Whole area is too poor to gain anything by war. We only lose.

 

[Homo Sapiens]

Because too many illegal immigrants come from your side to our side....and put a fiscal burden on already scarce situation (regarding jobs, resources, welfare etc).....stuff that any country must put for its own citizens first.

Bharati hanuman bhakts do not give any economic reason for their mythical 'Bangladeshi illegal' problem.They are a lot more straight of showing their hate for alleged 'muslim takeover' than like yourself.Ask Assam CM.