An Indian Colonel working on assignment in Afghanistan is presumed 'missing'

[noksss]

you had kasab roaming in your main city center but the world did not move.so in my opinion anything presented is shitt. better make use Iif arrested no two or number ten



up to you believe it or reject it im only posting the information.
besides Afghan taliban or Ttp they do look the otherway at times. besides Afghan taliban sre not bound to oppose or stop Ttp

No mam the world did move
https://www.un.org/sc/suborg/en/san...ist/summaries/individual/hafiz-muhammad-saeed

 

[Spring Onion]

If such clandestine information is available to random Pakistani civilians, I wonder whats stopping the ISI from targeting such meetings

it is not available to random civilians.
it was an internal circulation for security measures. the alert was issued on july 21.
as far targeting such meeting first of all we do not have access to these in Afghanistan secondly such information from informers is always having few points not detailed one.you can only become alert in most of the cases.
at times they can only provide you information like a bomber is dispatched from so and so atea riding a so and so vehicle no other detail.
this is how the complexity is prevailing in tough areas

 

[Windjammer]

Oh yes and Colonel was in Switzerland for happy life

Since you are obviously having comprehension issues, none the less it's not unknown for Indian armed forces personal to seek misadventure either, Commodore Sukhjinder Singh being a prime example.

Look at the Indias intel leadership ,all of them are from IPS .
Any way how a Pakistani can understand a vibrant democracy

Yup, IPS, the same premier department which nabbed the Pakistani spy.

 

[SrNair]

Since you are obviously having comprehension issues, none the less it's not unknown for Indian armed forces personal to seek misadventure either, Commodore Sukhjinder Singh being a prime example.

Yup, IPS, the same premier department which nabbed the Pakistani spy.

Your logical capability is like that bird in his hands .
So no reason in wasting our time

 

[Spring Onion]

No mam the world did move
https://www.un.org/sc/suborg/en/san...ist/summaries/individual/hafiz-muhammad-saeed

Whats the use?

 

[xyxmt]

Check Pakistani jail records

 

[noksss]

Whats the use?

Something like the below and your image worldwide

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...ens-to-terrorists-us/articleshow/59670180.cms

 

[Areesh]

You're Funny.
When Jinnah ordered direct action, he was still part of undivided India...so the people his actions killed were his own countrymen...be it Hindu or Muslim on either side of the what is now the border.
Modi also didn't order any killings, but his action (or inaction) led to a lot of killings...quite similar to Jinnah.
Also I don't remember Jinnah trying to cull the violence by asking his followers to stop...again..INACTION!

YES. He wasn't the ruler of any land, just the father of your nation! So to put if bluntly, your country doesn't elect terrorists as PM, it confers the title of Father of the nation on them, is it?

Only difference I will say is that Jinnah was able to reach genocide level scales of killing while Modi might be short on comparison in those stats...

Jinnah was fighting for a separate. He was fighting to make undivided India divided. How come random people living in undivided India became his responsibility? He was leader of only muslims and not every krishna, yadav or kumar. Jinnah did what was right for his people and to achieve his goal. Modi did what his hindutva ideology asked him to. He killed his own people for that. Jinnah had no legal authority to start or stop anything unlike Modi who had complete authority and full force to stop killings. We consider a Muslim leader as our father of nation unlike others who vote and elect a ruler involved in mass murder as PM of their pathetic country. There is a huge difference.

You guys have this bad habit of comparing apples and oranges. But then you need it defend your week position and to cover your filth.

I am not serching bro,I ment you would be searching for some insignificant ,hateful life who called our pm a terrorist without any proof.did you find any

Your PM is not just a terrorist. In fact he helps and supports other terrorists too to get them out of jail. He is a more filthier piece of shit than we though him to be.

 

[Taimoor Khan]

You guys have the TTP no.2 guy with you for a very long time but still no proof given to world community apart from the below rejected piece

Convince who? Your sugardaddies the yanks? they are your main sponsors, without their blessing, you are nobody in Afghanistan. We dont need to tell anyone, we are doing whatever we deem necesarry to uproot the Indian terror infra, Kulbi boy was once such example, and now this Indian Colonel.

 

[Rollno21]

Jinnah was fighting for a separate. He was fighting to make undivided India divided. How come random people living in undivided India became his responsibility? He was leader of only muslims and not every krishna, yadav or kumar. Jinnah did what was right for his people and to achieve his goal. Modi did what his hindutva ideology asked him to. He killed his own people for that. Jinnah had no legal authority to start or stop anything unlike Modi who had complete authority and full force to stop killings. We consider a Muslim leader as our father of nation unlike others who vote and elect a ruler involved in mass murder as PM of their pathetic country. There is a huge difference.

You guys have this bad habit of comparing apples and oranges. But then you need it defend your week position and to cover your filth.



Your PM is not just a terrorist. In fact he helps and supports other terrorists too to get them out of jail. He is a more filthier piece of shit than we though him to be.

If a Pakistani is saying so then he must be a good man.he is good terrorist.

 

[Spring Onion]

If a Pakistani is saying so then he must be a good man.he is good terrorist.

WHO??

 

[Rollno21]

WHO??

Any one ,who is good guy to the rest is a bad guy to Pakistan and anyone who is a good guy to Pakistan has been a bad guy to rest,in that sense if a Pakistani is calling a guy bad then he must be good for the rest .

 

[Taimoor Khan]

He is in the custody of the Haqqani network, we will use our good offices to procure his release on the condition that Lt Col Habib is safely returned to Pakistan, the Indians should act swiftly as the Haqqani network is notorious for it's brutality, Let me state unequivocally that the government of Pakistan denies any involvement in this most unfortunate incident.

Poor sod, cant tell what is worse for him, being in the custody of ISI or a hairy and burly Pathan.

 

[SingaporeGuy]

The colonel defected to pakistan?

 

[Spring Onion]

Any one ,who is good guy to the rest is a bad guy to Pakistan and anyone who is a good guy to Pakistan has been a bad guy to rest,in that sense if a Pakistani is calling a guy bad then he must be good for the rest .

For example who is a bad guy to the west?