Jungibaaz
RETIRED MOD
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2010
- Messages
- 8,756
- Reaction score
- 113
- Country
- Location
Again this is the best that you can challenge me on, a value judgement?Joke is on you who is now claiming 'am already aware of that' ...
Okay fine, but I still maintain that it is a joke. What am I saying is a joke? PTI’s budget management? No, haven’t claimed that anywhere, they’re doing as well as can be expected. Their macroeconomic management? No, it’s largely out of their control, they are unlucky to be in government at this time.
So what is a joke? Taking a bad situation and spinning it as some sort of victory, our finances suck, but hey look, if we revise our targets down several times, we can say we achieved them. It’s just PR.
Look at the way I worded what you have just quoted:
Revised target is understandably woeful but ‘achieving it’ as if you did something brilliant is a joke.
If the economy is slowing, increasing tax collection is impossible without causing lots of pain and further deflating it. I had hoped that with all the tough measures taken we might break 4,100 but I was sure that initial targets were completely fanciful. I don’t want to be unnecessarily critical of the government here, but this positive spin is completely false.
“Understandably woeful”, etc. I’ve basically excused them not meeting the target.
So what exactly are you upset about here? Where’s your objection?
If you breakdown the collection streams (imports taxes, export taxes, local taxes such as Income Tax, GST etc) and compare the streams and split %s from previous government, you should (but unlikely) realise that you need to study macroeconomics a bit more and research your figures properly before making wild statements!
Thanks again for stating the obvious. You’re trying to find an argument but you can’t, it comes off as strawmanning. Where have I said anything that contradicts the above? This government has been increases for tax revenues through multiple avenues, they have managed twin deficits as well as can be expected. They aren’t to blame for the current crises etc. These are things I’ve said on the forum multiple times. And nowhere here have I contradicted them in this thread.
So what are you arguing here?