What's new

Al-Azizia Accountability Court Verdict Against Nawaz Sharif 24/12/2018 live updates

Property was asked to be seized & a heavy fine was to be paid by both in Panama verdict as well but nothing happened, instead the donkey fed high courts released him. Now he has been sentenced again along with seizing of property & heavy fine but then yet again donkey fed hight courts are coming to the rescue.

SC will have to press NAB to collect the fine & seizing of property which was made by all corrupt means.
 
. . .
I mean Call NS corrupt, mafia or anything but provide evidence for a single penny corruption at least. I mean what is that decision.?

The Accusation from Imran Khan against NS is of laundering 300 billion rupees out of country (he has said this in many of his speeches), but where is the evidence?? Why courts in their decisions or observations in all the cases declare that, there is no proof that NS did any corruption, in current decision too, the court has punished him for not able to provide the money trail.

We can't Punish anyone until proven guilty (but is this been proven that NS is the owner of the said property? lets leave it to the higher court when & if an appeal been made), and that is the very reason NS is able to get bail or relief from higher courts, cuz there are flaws in NAB law.


People used to accuse NS big, regarding corruption, but no one possesses any solid evidence of how, where and when NS has done the corruption, i mean from where NS looted money?? like kick backs in govt projects, or some sort of bribery etc. etc.

I mean just compare with Zardari Fake account cases, Everything is getting clearer on daily basis, that how, where and when the money was looted and laundered out of the country, but we do not have such clarity in Ns cases, so as a result weak decisions.

I know the Youthia galum galooch brigade will now resort to usual abuse, but frankly, if Someone here or elsewhere is in possession of Solid evidence against NS for corruption/anything, he/she must take that evidence to court, so that next time we do not have to hear from courts that "There is no evidence/ proof against Nawaz Sharif regarding corruption", so that we can have strong/solid decisions, backed by strong evidence against Nawaz Sharif.





Prove the corruption in a court of law...


@Tameem

Financial laws are different to criminal laws. Its the same in all the western countries as well. If you have acquired wealth way beyond your income then you have to convince the court that your acquired wealth is through legal means. The standard procedure is to provide the sale deeds and bank transaction records.

So far the Sharif clan haven't provided a single piece of authentic document, just a qatari letter and a forged deed and its already been over 2 years.
 
. .
Can somebody explain to me how a high court can throw away the decision of the highest court of the land? Isn't the Supreme Court meant to be Supreme and hence has the final say?

Even i cant understand that?
 
.
Can somebody explain to me how a high court can throw away the decision of the highest court of the land? Isn't the Supreme Court meant to be Supreme and hence has the final say?

That is a good question. There is no proper accountability. The whole system stinks from top to bottom.
 
.
Can somebody explain to me how a high court can throw away the decision of the highest court of the land? Isn't the Supreme Court meant to be Supreme and hence has the final say?

Arite, i got the answer, this wasn't the SC, it was the accountability court.
 
. .
Why NS has cleared in FlagShip reference case??

Where is volume 10 now??? :big_boss:
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom