Sir all men are biased. As for the interests are concerned, the US has chosen India over Pakistan despite what we have done for the US over the decades. This is now visible to Pakistani people that our alliance with the US is all but over. As for the fueling insurgency in Balochistan is concerned, it has failed miserably. My original post was meant to make it clear that IF India goes ahead with this design, they will be dealing with a country that specializes in insurgency and counter insurgency warfare. Some of the best rules in the rule book of COIN/Covert Warfare were written by us. The best thing India's newly elected Hindu Reich can do to its people is to focus on providing them meals two times a day rather than injecting their resources into fulfilling their delusions of grandeur of establishing the 'Akhand Bharat' through the use of proxy warfare. If you have really spend as much time as you claim you have in South Asia with USSD, then you should know who funded, trained, armed and even militarily supported Mukhti Bhini in East Pakistan, who funded, trained and armed LTTE in Sri Lanka, who funded Pashtunistan movement in Pakistan's KPK, who trained, armed and supported Northern Alliance in Afghanistan, who is funding and harboring TTP and BLA in their 16 or so 'consulates' in Afghanistan. If you know the answer to these questions you would know who the 'aggressor' is. In the end Pakistan knows that it has no friends, our war against Indian proxy warfare is that of survival. We have no objectives to establish a 'greater Pakistan', we as a small nation just want to be left alone.
