What's new

AFPAK Administrative Union an Ultimate Peacemaker?

Kompromat

ADMINISTRATOR
Joined
May 3, 2009
Messages
40,366
Reaction score
416
Country
Pakistan
Location
Australia
AFPAK Administrative Union an ultimate peacemaker?

Background

Afghanistan because of its strategically important geographical location has faced a number of invasions throughout history. Starting from the Alexander in 330BC to Mongols to Turks to British , USSR & USA & allies. Most of them failed to establish dominance but spread death and destruction of biblical proportions.Since Pakistan's birth , successive wars in the region ie 1948 Kashmir war , 1965 IndoPak war , 1971 IndoPak war , 1979 soviet invasion of Afghanistan , 1980 Iran Iraq war , Afghanistan civil war , 1999 Kargil war & 2001 US invasion of Afghanistan.

This is enough to put things in perspective that we currently live in a highly unstable and volatile region , all of the above wars killed dozens of millions of people in the region.Given the above context its easy to understand that there is "no" quick fix to this problem of insecurity. In today's connected world , neighboring nations cannot under any circumstances avoid the devastating effects of warfare next door. Pakistan has first hand experience of having 4 million refugees in the aftermath of Soviet Afghan and American Afghan wars which took a heavy toll on Pakistani economy and social makeup and trends.

Pakistan and the rest of the world suffers from instability in Afghanistan , be it refugees , human trafficking , drugs , arms and what not. Not having a quick fix to Afghanistan problem complicates the state of affairs concerning Afghanistan , a country which now has to start over from the scratch after 30 years of non stop war. If it ever does , Pakistan is the first frontier to get effected by any development inside Afghan borders.

Proposal

The proposal is not new , Pakistani leadership in the past namely Liaqat ali Khan an ethnic Pashtun as well as Zulfikar ali bhutto reportedly discussed the idea of a "Cooperative Union" with their Afghan counterparts at that time. As per my understanding if we have to re-stabilize this region , we should take concrete steps towards the idea of an "Administrative - Cooperative Union" structure between Pakistan and Afghanistan and the integration of the worldview and foreign policy. The examples can be made of the Scandinavian states in this regard. This idea "Does not" call for a state merger or an effective one unit unification. Rather its about integrating both countries into a "mutual political & economical, administrative mechanism ".

It should be built upon the following dynamics.

1: A single currency & stock market , tax regime & social liabilities.
2: Integrated foreign policy.
3: Freedom of movement - unrestricted border access & visa free travel.
4: Unrestricted mass transit and trade route.
5: Integrated primary and higher education & .
6: Integrated working rights.
7: Language promotion in both countries.
8: Integrated strategic & defense regime.
9: Integrated policy on narcotics , rights to have arms , national database etc.
10:Free trade & transit to Pakistani ports for Afghan goods.



This arrangement can work under an organization which may look after the compliance of above policies by both countries much like EU. Or what GCC countries would eventually become.

Benefits

To Afghanistan.

1: Unrestricted movement , allowing communities specially Pashtuns to make cultural interaction easier.

2: Unrestricted access to Afghan students to Pakistani schools , colleges and universities.

3: Access to Pakistani job market

4: Unlimited access to food supplies which Afghanistan has to import otherwise.

5: Strategic protection under an already established and experienced Military & nuclear apparatus.

6: Unrestricted access to Pakistani ports.

7: Afghanistan can benefit from Pakistan's well established ties with China & Middle east.


To Pakistan.

1: End of civil and international conflict right on the border, ability to project full military power towards India.

2: Control over narcotics and arms

3: World's largest Islamic union, expanding diplomatic and economic footprint in the region.

4: Ability to connect with central asia , Turkey and Russia

5: Permanent solution to refugee problem

6: Strategic balance even possible parity with India/keeping India out of our backyard.

7: Access to mineral and human resources

8: Successful union would earn Pakistan a greater say internationally

9: Removing hotbeds of extremist groups

10: Greater integration with Afghan and Central asian culture giving wider avenue of opportunities.


Loads more can be debated to establish that such an arrangement would make complete sense , and would ultimately be the answer not just Pakistan but the world is looking for right now.

Moral of the story

Moral of the story is , that Afghanistan unfortunately has lost two entire generations to brutal wars. They have lost their ability to self govern which they in time might be able to regain but not without further turmoil even a possible civil war after 2014 pullout.

Afghanistan needs help not just in peacemaking but also in administration. With a literacy rate of 35% it would take decades to rebuild the ability to self administration. This cooperative arrangement would offer what both countries and the world needs from this region without jeopardizing the sovereignty or security of Afghanistan , Pakistan and the world.

* For concerned citizens: Pakistan would have to bite the bullet if it ever comes to that , its a far less price to pay when compared to what we are paying or have paid already.



Pak_Af_Union.png



Regards: Aeronaut
 
Last edited:
To have a union with Afghanistan, then democrazy is not possible because then puppets like Karzai and Zardari will serve only western interests. Either Pakistan army rules Pakistan and Afghanistan or Mujaheddin rule Afghanistan and Pakistan Army rules Pakistan.

I'm all for a union

pakistan-afghanistan-the-conjoined-twins.jpg


But if it doesn't happen then Pakistan has nothing to lose. There's more treasure in Pak Sarzameen than there are in Afghan Sarzameen.
 
Its not about comparisons , we owe help to Afghanistan and for all good reasons - and most of all for ourselves.
Current Afghanistan is a direct threat to our prosperity - together we can defeat it.
 
Its not about comparisons , we owe help to Afghanistan and for all good reasons - and most of all for ourselves.
Current Afghanistan is a direct threat to our prosperity - together we can defeat it.

Yes the current Afghanistan is a pain in the neck for Pakistan but thats because india and other enemies of Pakistan are using Afghan soil against Pakistan. Once they are out, then things will get better for Pakistan.

And having a union with Afghanistan will not be an easy task.

Muhammad Aslam Khan Khattak tried to negotiate with the Afghan government after independence in 1947 about a Pakistan-Afghanistan confederation but Afghan government didn't want it. He then said to the Afghan government that Pakhtoons of Pakistan will always be with Pakistan. We had the best chance to convince Afghanistan again in the 1990's.
 
It will be a good if unified. But its only possible when both the countries have true leadership not westren puppets like Zardari, Karzai etc. It will be win win for both Pak and Afgan.
 
It will be a good if unified. But its only possible when both the countries have true leadership not westren puppets like Zardari, Karzai etc. It will be win win for both Pak and Afgan.

Agreed, but the most important factor is to measure the appetite, for such an arrangement on both sides amongst the young public which make up a bulk of population in both Nations.
 
I am positive the OP has ruling Afghanistan in mind than really merging. Are you going to accept Karzai as your President if he wins election? This will be another BD. You cannot have your country expand but keep the powers with the people of one region only.
 
I am positive the OP has ruling Afghanistan in mind than really merging. Are you going to accept Karzai as your President if he wins election? This will be another BD. You cannot have your country expand but keep the powers with the people of one region only.

No Pakistani would have problems with an Afghan ruler, in 1956 or 1958 there was about to be a confederation with King Zahir Shah of Afghanistan as the constitutional monarch but talks fell through.
 
I am positive the OP has ruling Afghanistan in mind than really merging. Are you going to accept Karzai as your President if he wins election? This will be another BD. You cannot have your country expand but keep the powers with the people of one region only.

Why not an Afghan president ? I am up for it.
We share deep rooted, cultural, geographical, lingual, economic, religious and historic relations that will never fade away. Such an arrangement, can grantee peace and stability for the entire region and a win win for both countries. Pakistan's access to Russia and Turkey are two huge advantages for us and Afghanistan's access to our ports and India is for them. The arrangement has to be based on two democratic states model without a full merger and two heads of state, very much like the UAE.
 
Why not an Afghan president ? I am up for it.
We share deep rooted, cultural, geographical, lingual, economic, religious and historic relations that will never fade away. Such an arrangement, can grantee peace and stability for the entire region and a win win for both countries. Pakistan's access to Russia and Turkey are two huge advantages for us and Afghanistan's access to our ports and India is for them. The arrangement has to be based on two democratic states model without a full merger and two heads of state, very much like the UAE.

UAE cannot be compared with *******. UAE has less population than Karachi, and much more differences and complications.

When we cannot handle our own smaller country, how can we expect to keep Afg in order?

BTW, isn't the Afghan culture more Persian while our is more Mughal (or a mix of alot of cultures)?

Is Af...-...Pak a banned word?
 
UAE cannot be compared with *******. UAE has less population than Karachi, and much more differences and complications.

When we cannot handle our own smaller country, how can we expect to keep Afg in order?

BTW, isn't the Afghan culture more Persian while our is more Mughal (or a mix of alot of cultures)?

Is Af...-...Pak a banned word?

I,never made a comparison between UAE & Afghanistan but rather was giving an example of a similar setup. Well, honestly Pakistan has to put up with Afghanistan and its troubles for eternity, either we embrace it or allow it to become a breeding ground for Anti Pakistan groups supported by India. Geographic realities are there, and i have never said it will be a walk in the park. Afghanistan needs Pakistan to survive, and we can't achieve peace without peace in Afghanistan means we need them too.

They are totally dependent on us, for trade access and even food, we are depended on them for access to central asian markets and energy corridor. It also will totally solve the issues Pashtuns are facing with the division that durand line presents. Think, outside the box, AFPAK Administrative Union can place both countries in a very important geostrategic position, where we could benefit from Central Asia, China, and the Middle east at the same time.

Lastly, i am not talking about controlling Afghans, they should have their own govt and be a country of their own but with areas of cooperation mentioned above should be shared with Pakistan.
 
Dr. Israr Ahmad said at least in 2 of his interviews that I watched that he thinks Afghan & Pakistan will become one country ...
=
At minutes :00:13:35+

Hidden Truth - End of Time Part 2 of 4 - by Dr. Shahid Masood - YouTube

=
=
=

Besides our national anthem is in Persian language ... isn't it interesting.!!! Persian is not spoken language in any substantial group in Pakistan...!!!

Also many motos that our military use, like that poetry Air Force uses... also in Persian...!!!
 
What are your thoughts?
I agree with you. Whenever you don't see me commenting, it means I agree wholeheartedly. :D

What people forget here is, we Pukhtoons under different treaties, already have freedom of movement on both sides of the border. We never considered our blood brothers on the other side to be someone separate from us. People first need to understand the ground realities and then comment.

It will be a win win situation for everyone!
 
Back
Top Bottom