What's new

Afghans going to Afghanistan

so do I, they go with the majority opinion as well as try their utmost to maintain a neutral stance (the name 'Pakistan Defense' is a misnomer).

if one person is talking facts and more are are against him, the liars/trolls win simply because it is better to loos one than many.

for example me vs. 3 bharatis, I will loose in the reporting lark, in-fact will be threatened by mods as well as receive warning points/bans
If you are one in majority. You must not insult the majority.i know we Pakistani are not perfect like any other nation but we always send our best sons to defend these helpless arabs. What disgrace
 
.
so do I, they go with the majority opinion as well as try their utmost to maintain a neutral stance (the name 'Pakistan Defense' is a misnomer).

if one person is talking facts and more are are against him, the liars/trolls win simply because it is better to loos one than many.

for example me vs. 3 bharatis, I will loose in the reporting lark, in-fact will be threatened by mods as well as receive warning points/bans

in arguments between 2 people they are neutral but if it is 1 vs. more they take part of the 'more'
Sir, they have rules in place to report trolls and not feed them. In fact, one can never convince a troll with facts. But I assure you there is no such thing as putting up with trolls and letting them provoke havoc, after all they have to maintain the image and class of this forum that has membership from across the world.
Had they been siding with trolls, we would have never seen this plethora of nationalities who are contributing to the forum and getting positive ratings.
 
.
so do I, they go with the majority opinion as well as try their utmost to maintain a neutral stance (the name 'Pakistan Defense' is a misnomer).

if one person is talking facts and more are are against him, the liars/trolls win simply because it is better to lose one than many.

for example me vs. 3 bharatis, I will lose in the reporting lark, in-fact will be threatened by mods as well as receive warning points/bans

in arguments between 2 people they are neutral but if it is 1 vs. more they take part of the 'more'

Bro I got your back.
 
.
Afghanistan can't be fixed. Whatever country annexes it, should get a Nobel peace prize for 50 years in a row for taking responsibility for that mess.

The country was fixed and very happy under the Soviet Bloc until US and its allies(now ex allies) messed it all up. 40 years of war would do this to any country. Taliban is single biggest reason for bringing this country to such a low point and it is only fair that these people are entering the country which is the largest supporter of Taliban.
 
.
The country was fixed and very happy under the Soviet Bloc until US and its allies(now ex allies) messed it all up. 40 years of war would do this to any country. Taliban is single biggest reason for bringing this country to such a low point and it is only fair that these people are entering the country which is the largest supporter of Taliban.
not really. just a bunch of people in kabul were happy but the countryside was *** backward. taliban has the majority support. even the resident afgans on this forum support taliban. that's why that country is hopeless. they want to live like 10,000 bc people. even ancient empires roman empire,, tang dynasty etc. were more advanced than the afghan countryside.
 
.
not really. just a bunch of people in kabul were happy but the countryside was *** backward. taliban has the majority support. even the resident afgans on this forum support taliban. that's why that country is hopeless. they want to live like 10,000 bc people. even ancient empires roman empire,, tang dynasty etc. were more advanced than the afghan countryside.

I haven't seen an Afghan member on the forum except 1 and he could very well be a false flagger. In any case even if there were 10 it wouldn't matter. That is a mighty small sample space to judge who they support. Population of 40 million and you met maybe a couple(who might or might not be Afghan) and think the whole support the Taliban?
 
.
I haven't seen an Afghan member on the forum except 1 and he could very well be a false flagger. In any case even if there were 10 it wouldn't matter. That is a mighty small sample space to judge who they support. Population of 40 million and you met maybe a couple(who might or might not be Afghan) and think the whole support the Taliban?
yes
 
. .
They are crossing border from Pakistan into Afghanistan.. they are not entering in Pakistan.

Irrelivant. They are behaving like animals. Whether they are crossing into Afghanistan or Timbuktu is really not the point here. You can conclude that Afghans don't like to be civil and wait for their turn. They are running around and breaking rules. If this is how they enter their own country by showing zero regard for law and regulations, one can only imagine how they behave in other host nations.

There is no point in arguing here. The Afghans are wrong.
 
Last edited:
.
Well, i would rather prefer taking in fellow Muslim Afghan, then a racist Pakistani mindlessly pandering xenophobic rants against the Afghan community for everything that occurs. A narrative similar to those espoused by the far right in the west.





First and foremost, the Egyptian government is completely incompetent and does not work for the shared interest of its populace. I'm completely against this wall, I belive the Palestinians in Gaza who face many challenges, should be allowed to freely enter Egypt.

Why are you on this Pakistani forum if you think Pakistanis are racist and Afghans are real Muslims?

You still haven't answered any of my questions. You are conveniently ignoring them. Egyptians can't handle Ethiopians claiming river Nile. Egyptians are fuming and caling for reprisals.

Here you are lecturing Pakistanis how racist they are when Afghans claim entire provinces of Pakistan and don't recognise the Durand Line border. This is Pakistani land. You foreigners who have zero understanding of this conflict jump in and start lecturing Pakistanis about right and wrong.

You want Pakistanis to accept Afghan demands? You want Pakistanis to handover two of its provinces to Afghanistan? That is obviously not going to happen.

The video demonstrates that Afghans are uncivilised people who don't even adhere to rules of their own country. Europeans and Americans who came into Afghanistan as their saviours have abandoned them. Afghans aren't even allowed to seek refuge in Western capitals. Their applications are rejected. The US and NATO forces are today unwilling to continue the war in Afghanistan. They understand that this barren land and its useless people have nothing to offer.

People like you who know nothing about the conflict between Afghanistan and Pakistan should remain quiet.
 
Last edited:
.
Irrelivant. They are behaving like animals. Whether they are crossing into Afghanistan or Timbuktu is really not the point here. You can conclude that Afghans don't like to be civil and wait for their turn. They are running around and breaking rules. If this is how they enter their own country by showing zero regard for law and regulations, one can only imagine how they behave in other host nations.

There is no point in arguing here. The Afghans are wrong.

Not irrelevant in context of what you were saying. My reply was not in defense of Afghans. That was to make you see you are wrong in blaming Pakistani Authorities for LETTING THE AFGHANS IN like this.

"Which country allows citizens from another nation to enter the country without official paperwork? Pakistan does.

Our leaders are a complete failure."
 
.
Back
Top Bottom