What's new

Afghanistan on the brink of a Civil War due to the political deadlock.

SBD-3

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 19, 2008
Messages
15,120
Reaction score
-9
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
BxecP-wCIAAphnv.png
 
. . .
The fear of IK/PTI has taken away the sanity of certain posters here. @Horus Please alter the title so that it is reflective of the actual contents of the news and not the personal opinion of the thread starter. There is no resemblance between post-election situation in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
 
.
this guy really hate jung group and love IK very much.:haha:
 
. . . .
@SBD-3 please provide translation and some analysis to connect it with your thread title. Otherwise I will have to lock it. Thanks.
Here it goes
Afghanistan is on the brink of a civil war due to a persisting deadlock on the results of presidential elections. Haris Nisar, an Afghan MP, told the american website that the crisis has also taken its toll on common people as the uncertainty looms in the minds of common people. Muhammad Ahsan, 62 and a real estate dealer said that people are very cautious these days. Furthermore, NATO and US are also worried on the deteriorating situation as due to Afghanistan not signing the security agreement, the exit strategy of US and NATO troops is in serious jeopardy. Haris Nisar further said that the situation had the potential of turning Afghanistan into another Iraq and given the fears materialize, the situation will spiral out of control. It is pertinent to note that Ashraf Ghani leads the initial results of presidential elections. However, Abdullah Abudllah has refused to accept the results claiming the process to be rigged.
 
. . . .
And where is your analysis to connect it with the title :p:
There cant be any analysis because there is a fundamental difference between post-Election situation in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The difference is, soon after the voting results started to go in favor of Mr. Ghani, Mr. Abdullah Abdullah refused to accept the results and threatened to establish a parallel government (which clearly means civil war). IK/PTI on the other hand, did not go for agitation rather allowed PML(N) to form the government, and simultaneously went to the Election tribunals and courts to get the disputed results settled. The Election tribunals were/are bound to settle the disputes within 120 days but failed to do their job presumably under government pressure (for example Saad Rafiq filed a petition to suspend the re-counting in his constituency and Election tribunal abides). IK/PTI gave Election tribunals 16 months instead of 4 months to resolve the disputes and only after that went on with the sit-in (just a sit-in and not a parallel government or civil war).

It is unfortunate that the thread starter tried to draw parallels between two very different situations. There is simply no comparison between a civil war veteran Abdullah Abdullah, and Imran Khan, so equating IK's sit-in with Abdullah Abdullah's threats of forming a parallel government (and he has necessary military power to do that too) is worst kind of intellectual dishonesty. It is also sad that a Mod has apparently (courts use a nice expression "badi un nazar mein") given undue favor to the thread starter, and instead of correcting a clearly misguiding/dis-informative title, asked to provide with an analysis (while perhaps knowing that situation in Pakistan and Afghanistan is anything but similar) to establish some connection with the title. We will see if the misleading title remains as is or corrective measures were taken.
 
Last edited:
.
Tajiks at this point are most powerfull single ethnic in Afghanistan. And since Afghanistan is all about ethnic wars, i can see why Tajiks will not want pashtun as president.
 
.

Same thing could happen in Pakistan, had IK not accepted results of 2013 immediately. Yet he did to save the integrity of the system since the country was rocked by terrorist attacks back then. But he never accepted widespread rigging, and always talked about exposing it and demanded scrutiny for those involved so that next election could become free and fair.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom