What's new

Afghan refugees in Pakistan face an uncertain future after June 30

Devil Soul

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
22,931
Reaction score
45
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Afghan refugees face an uncertain future after June 30
By Naveed Ahmad
Published: June 24, 2016
2,347SHARES
SHARE TWEET EMAIL
1129396-afghanrefugeesafp-1466760742-887-640x480.jpg

Afghan refugees wait at the UNHCR registration centre in Peshawar on June 23, 2016. PHOTO: AFP

Islamabad may not renew the Pakistan Proof of Registration cards for 2.5 million Afghan refugees due to expire on June 30. After having hosted their three generations, Islamabad has changed its mood. Already, intelligence agencies are on the hunt for Afghan nationals who either possess Pakistani nationality or are not registered with the government as refugees. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), however, is trying to persuade Pakistan to adopt a more accommodative approach.

Assassination of Taliban supremo Mullah Mansour, carrying documents that identify him as a Pakistani citizenship with a fake name, and spiking tensions at Torkham checkpoint caused this rude awakening.

Limited action

From a Pakistani perspective, Mullah Mansour’s possession of an identity card and passport was not only a national embarrassment but was also indicative of the country’s multi-layered Afghan challenge. Officially, the country is home to 2.5 million Afghan refugees of whom thousands carry computerised national identity cards. The two-way movement on Durand Line has survived many highs and lows between the two countries. Islamabad’s decision to fence, gate and trench its border with its western neighbour was aimed at addressing the issue of unregulated movement across the border.

UN urges Pakistanis not to label Afghan refugees ‘terrorists’

Some Afghans leaders just don’t want any such barrier, meantime hoping for Pakistan to not only eliminate safe havens for extremists but also to secures cities as far as Kabul. Sartaj Aziz, the government’s point man for foreign affairs, categorically stated Islamabad can’t fight Afghanistan’s war on its soil. Moreover, he reminded his Afghan counterpart of the continued presence of refugees.

For Kabul, its citizens’ plight matters little. Former President Hamid Karzai, who allegedly bagged millions of dollars from donors and foreign governments alike, left the issue of Afghan citizens on the backburner. Following his footsteps, the Ghani-Abdullah government has chosen to pick fights with Pakistan rather than to ensure writ of the state. The exodus of Afghans continues not only to Pakistan but also to Turkey and beyond.

Meanwhile, the UNHCR provides a meagre sum of $200 per family for travel and housing purposes. The cash-starved UN agency is already facing severe donor fatigue. Lawless Iraq and Libya, and the tyranny of Bashar al-Assad in Syria have left millions looking for safer places. The last thing the world needed was another refugee crisis involving about three million people.

Possible outcomes

Pakistan’s relations with Afghanistan were always shy of friendship. The Soviet invasion of Kabul in December 1979 left Islamabad with no choice but to allow unrestricted inflow of the fleeing masses. Soon it realised that the exiles could be helped to launch an insurgency against the communist superpower.

Pakistan calls for aid for its millions of Afghan refugees

There was neither a registration process in place nor any restriction on movement across the border. Three decades down the road, many Afghans not only hold Pakistani identity cards but also own business and properties. There are countless who fondly call Pakistan their home. They are neither Taliban sympathisers nor smugglers or drug traffickers. Universally, refugees are known to add value to the host country’s economy and skill set but in Pakistan their contribution goes unnoticed and uncelebrated.

Besides being a strain on the economy, Pakistan sees Afghan settlements as places harbouring extremists and terrorist cells. Many officials believe that the time for housekeeping is now as the Zarb-e-Azb operation is nearing completion.

With Syria lying in ruins and Iraq at the mercy of Daesh and Iran-backed militias, Afghanistan stays on the backburner. Neither Muslim nations nor western countries attach urgency to the plight of Afghans. Meanwhile, quadrilateral dialogue has become the casualty of a US drone strike. Currently the Obama administration is assigning more military assets to Afghanistan to fight an impending insurgency. Thus, one can expect more Afghan refugees in the future.

In the likely best-case scenario, Islamabad may extend the registration for Afghan refugees till December. If this happens, the matter will be deferred again, giving landlocked Afghanistan enough time to introspect. The Durand Line has been non-negotiable since 1947 and so will remain. Afghanistan’s internal law and order and the plight of its citizen is within the mandate of the unity government. Deciding against managing the international border and taking responsibility for its citizens won’t support Ghani-Abdullah mantra of foreign hand in terrorism.

World left Pakistan alone to face terrorists: Asim Bajwa

Islamabad can’t match its aggressive tone against refugees with action after hosting them for over three decades. The Afghan government and its policies might be unfriendly but the refugees Kabul refuses to help return home aren’t.

Naveed Ahmad is a Pakistani investigative journalist and academic with extensive reporting experience in the Middle East and North Africa. He is based in Doha and Istanbul. He tweets @naveed360.
 
.
If we are going to extend it in any case, do it like Iran, lock them in 40, 50 KM radius with limited movements in camps like refugees.
 
. . .
I think it's time to say it off if who ever extends it even our army than I believe they are the enemies of state

For 40 years we took them no refuges lived that much life as refuges look the behavior of West with Syrians they did nothing yet they get harsh treatment

It's time pakistani people warn military and leaders it's not acceptable even a single sec more after 30 June
 
.
I must say pakistan poorly handled the refugees situation. It could have used them as a massive leverage and affect policy in afghanistan but instead we chose to alienate them. ISI also need to look into players other than taliban to influence afghan policy.
 
.
After the arrest of ANA present officer from texila..firing at turkham border and dailay barking of afghan gov against PAK...IF our Hukmaran n Army(which alone can take bold decisions without gov) couldn't send them back should die of shame n should not be considered less than a traitor
 
.
Refugees are a big mess not only creating social problems but also an increase in crimes.
You are struggling with Syrian refugees for 2 years. We have tolerated Millions of afghans for 37 years! since 79. The repay we get is terrorism from afghans.
 
.
I must say pakistan poorly handled the refugees situation. It could have used them as a massive leverage and affect policy in afghanistan but instead we chose to alienate them. ISI also need to look into players other than taliban to influence afghan policy.

I see your point very clearly. This is pak government failure. The afghans are our brothers. If 10% of them do drugs and cause problems then why blame all of them. It's our failure. We just let them roam around the country freely and now finally woken up. We could have educated their youths and could have told them about Pakistan and it's love and respect for afghans. Instead our government was busy looting. And now why are we kicking them out. We should interview them all and see who wants to stay and who wants to go. Then registrations and visas could be given to those who want to stay. Those who want to leave we should move them with respect. Blaming and accusations will lead to shooting your self in the foot. Also why do we have only taliban as allies. We need more allies. It's definitely the flawed policy of government. I remember I went to mirpur in 2015 and met afghans. They all hated Pakistan army and blamed them for them being kicked out and the afghans claimed they are friends with India since centuries. But what I noticed was their lack of information. Our government should be answering their queries. They are lead to believe India is their friend and Pakistan is the enemy. Them poor guys didn't know it was India who supported the Russian invasion of Afghanistan in 1980s which killed thousand of Afghans. And also the old hindustan which was Afghanistan friend we Pakistanis were also part of that. So when I mentioned this they all were baffled. The point is we rather than sharing facts and treating this in a professional manner are instead looking confused and frustrated and are then blaming afghans for everything. This is flawed policy.
 
.
Simple solution..they should go back to Afghanistan in Zahedan, Qandhar, Qalat, Kabul, Jalalabad, Taloqan and Faizabad and declare confederation with Pakistan, that way they can again become Pakistani citizens.



Afghan refugees face an uncertain future after June 30
By Naveed Ahmad
Published: June 24, 2016
2,347SHARES
SHARE TWEET EMAIL
1129396-afghanrefugeesafp-1466760742-887-640x480.jpg

Afghan refugees wait at the UNHCR registration centre in Peshawar on June 23, 2016. PHOTO: AFP

Islamabad may not renew the Pakistan Proof of Registration cards for 2.5 million Afghan refugees due to expire on June 30. After having hosted their three generations, Islamabad has changed its mood. Already, intelligence agencies are on the hunt for Afghan nationals who either possess Pakistani nationality or are not registered with the government as refugees. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), however, is trying to persuade Pakistan to adopt a more accommodative approach.

Assassination of Taliban supremo Mullah Mansour, carrying documents that identify him as a Pakistani citizenship with a fake name, and spiking tensions at Torkham checkpoint caused this rude awakening.

Limited action

From a Pakistani perspective, Mullah Mansour’s possession of an identity card and passport was not only a national embarrassment but was also indicative of the country’s multi-layered Afghan challenge. Officially, the country is home to 2.5 million Afghan refugees of whom thousands carry computerised national identity cards. The two-way movement on Durand Line has survived many highs and lows between the two countries. Islamabad’s decision to fence, gate and trench its border with its western neighbour was aimed at addressing the issue of unregulated movement across the border.

UN urges Pakistanis not to label Afghan refugees ‘terrorists’

Some Afghans leaders just don’t want any such barrier, meantime hoping for Pakistan to not only eliminate safe havens for extremists but also to secures cities as far as Kabul. Sartaj Aziz, the government’s point man for foreign affairs, categorically stated Islamabad can’t fight Afghanistan’s war on its soil. Moreover, he reminded his Afghan counterpart of the continued presence of refugees.

For Kabul, its citizens’ plight matters little. Former President Hamid Karzai, who allegedly bagged millions of dollars from donors and foreign governments alike, left the issue of Afghan citizens on the backburner. Following his footsteps, the Ghani-Abdullah government has chosen to pick fights with Pakistan rather than to ensure writ of the state. The exodus of Afghans continues not only to Pakistan but also to Turkey and beyond.

Meanwhile, the UNHCR provides a meagre sum of $200 per family for travel and housing purposes. The cash-starved UN agency is already facing severe donor fatigue. Lawless Iraq and Libya, and the tyranny of Bashar al-Assad in Syria have left millions looking for safer places. The last thing the world needed was another refugee crisis involving about three million people.

Possible outcomes

Pakistan’s relations with Afghanistan were always shy of friendship. The Soviet invasion of Kabul in December 1979 left Islamabad with no choice but to allow unrestricted inflow of the fleeing masses. Soon it realised that the exiles could be helped to launch an insurgency against the communist superpower.

Pakistan calls for aid for its millions of Afghan refugees

There was neither a registration process in place nor any restriction on movement across the border. Three decades down the road, many Afghans not only hold Pakistani identity cards but also own business and properties. There are countless who fondly call Pakistan their home. They are neither Taliban sympathisers nor smugglers or drug traffickers. Universally, refugees are known to add value to the host country’s economy and skill set but in Pakistan their contribution goes unnoticed and uncelebrated.

Besides being a strain on the economy, Pakistan sees Afghan settlements as places harbouring extremists and terrorist cells. Many officials believe that the time for housekeeping is now as the Zarb-e-Azb operation is nearing completion.

With Syria lying in ruins and Iraq at the mercy of Daesh and Iran-backed militias, Afghanistan stays on the backburner. Neither Muslim nations nor western countries attach urgency to the plight of Afghans. Meanwhile, quadrilateral dialogue has become the casualty of a US drone strike. Currently the Obama administration is assigning more military assets to Afghanistan to fight an impending insurgency. Thus, one can expect more Afghan refugees in the future.

In the likely best-case scenario, Islamabad may extend the registration for Afghan refugees till December. If this happens, the matter will be deferred again, giving landlocked Afghanistan enough time to introspect. The Durand Line has been non-negotiable since 1947 and so will remain. Afghanistan’s internal law and order and the plight of its citizen is within the mandate of the unity government. Deciding against managing the international border and taking responsibility for its citizens won’t support Ghani-Abdullah mantra of foreign hand in terrorism.

World left Pakistan alone to face terrorists: Asim Bajwa

Islamabad can’t match its aggressive tone against refugees with action after hosting them for over three decades. The Afghan government and its policies might be unfriendly but the refugees Kabul refuses to help return home aren’t.

Naveed Ahmad is a Pakistani investigative journalist and academic with extensive reporting experience in the Middle East and North Africa. He is based in Doha and Istanbul. He tweets @naveed360.
 
.
i guess trump is right . afghan refugees in pak are immigrants like those in europe and america. and yes there are always mischievous people in such groups and due to such people the whole lot suffers. majority of us want to get rid of afghans the same way trump wants to get rid of the muslims in USA. when he blames muslims for all the troubles we feel bad and when we do the same with the afghans we think we are doing the right thing. why double standards? what is the solution to this refugee problem? what are the options? we can't tag all of them and track their activities. it's impossible.we can't bring all of them in the main stream. there will always be many who will remain poor and they will play in the hands of anyone who pays them. they will become criminals, terrorists , agents etc . so when we can't do anything we are left with only viable option. send all of them back to their country. in such a case the innocent will also suffer but there is no other option.
 
.
Nothing is going to change. It's Pakistan: a country without government.
 
. .
Simple solution..they should go back to Afghanistan in Zahedan, Qandhar, Qalat, Kabul, Jalalabad, Taloqan and Faizabad and declare confederation with Pakistan, that way they can again become Pakistani citizens.


Hi,

That is what I wrote awhile ago---let us give these refugees a choice----go back to afghanistan and declare your allegiance and split your states from afghanistan to join pakistan.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom