Admiral:US needed for South China Sea security

[fly2012]

True, but I like freedom of speech better and the power to the people, not the central government who controls and monitors every of your movements. Remember, it wasn't the American people who voted on Agent orange, nukes, etc. It was their president, hate their president not the country. Don't be a fool. Now let's put this in perspective, can you change the person in charge of your country if you don't like him? In America, yes. In China, no, go take a hike. So what's a better choice? America.

Are you suggesting that victims of Agent Orange would've felt a lot better if the crime is from a country that can change the lead by election? So if the crime is committed by a dictator you should hate the country and if is from leader of a country that is "power to the people", you only hate the president??? Where did you learn logic? Don't spend all your parents' money on pho.

 

[fly2012]

I agree with you to an extent. Yet the fact is South china sea or East sea is not a sole property of China and hence you cannot shoot down someone who is well within their area according to maritime laws

That's reasonable, I myself never support solving differences by force. The recent shooting was actually never verified by either China or Vietnam officially (China officially denied it). The news was initially released from Japan actually.

 

[vtnsx]

Are you suggesting that victims of Agent Orange would've felt a lot better if the crime is from a country that can change the lead by election? So if the crime is committed by a dictator you should hate the country and if is from leader of a country that is "power to the people", you only hate the president??? Where did you learn logic? Don't spend all your parents' money on pho.

LOL, you live in a country that thrived on democracy yet you failed to understand the word freedom of speech and human right and freedom. Oh right, you just moved to America right? that's why you haven't got a clue on the history of America and the Vietnam War because you're so selfish and don't care about the rest of the world. Not every Chinese are bad, but people like you make me laughs. For your information, you do not understand the Vietnam War as much as we do and the Americans. Don't try to act smart here because you know nothing about it. It's complicated unlike what you perceived and think it ought to be. Your statement above proved to me you know nothing of Vietnam War, you think you know better than the Vietnamese people? You think China would made Vietnam better? LOL you're a funny comedian.

 

[longyi]

Dude, China map in Quing dynasy showed No islands in SCS(east sea), and Quing officer also said :'those island belong to VietNam' when some Western ships were attached by pirates. So , China have No right , Nothing to do in SCS(east sea) now. The only way for China to solve the dispute is withdraw all of their troops on those islands and return them back to VN.

US-India's ship etc have the right to sail freely in International water in SCS(east sea), so they have the Right to protect their benefit agaisnt China ilegal and ridiculous claims there.

LOL You know how outlandish you sound :"Quing officer also said: 'those island belong to VietNam' ". ?? Where this come from? How do you know what a Quing officer said? You heard it?

If 6 nation claim the Spratly islands/shoals, I give all of them the benefit of doubts and surmise they all have legitimate reasons to validate their claims. We are no experts and we all believe we are right, so further debate on the matters is mooted because we are all guilty of being hardheadedness as well

Let the UN hires a panel of experts to arbitrate the situations at hand, But until then no one country should occupy or develop any island/shoal. This, perhaps is a way to avoid all out wars.

 

[NiceGuy]

LOL You know how outlandish you sound :"Quing officer also said: 'those island belong to VietNam' ". ?? Where this come from? How do you know what a Quing officer said? You heard it?

If 6 nation claim the Spratly islands/shoals, I give all of them the benefit of doubts and surmise they all have legitimate reasons to validate their claims. We are no experts and we all believe we are right, so further debate on the matters is mooted because we are all guilty of being hardheadedness as well
.

in 1985-1986 Quing officer sent a letter to England when their ship were attacked by pirated at those island to refuse China's responsibility with reason " Paracel archipelago is unrelated to China !"

năm 1895-1896, để trả lời văn thư phản kháng của Chính phủ Anh, Tổng đốc Lưỡng Quảng Trung Hoa đã phủ nhận trách nhiệm với lý do: "Hoàng Sa không liên hệ gì tới Trung Quốc”
Vi

Let the UN hires a panel of experts to arbitrate the situations at hand, But until then no one country should occupy or develop any island/shoal. This, perhaps is a way to avoid all out wars

But China don't want to resolve this case in International course bcz they know they will lose all when they want to control All SCS(east sea).

 

[SamantK]

I'm quoting a Chinese guy on this forum, about the incident of shooting viet fishermen, "Pragmatic Foreign Policy"! Serious retardness!