LA se Karachi
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2016
- Messages
- 1,672
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
IN this day and age when every one have a 65-80 inch screen at home, a standard threater with a standard 120 inch screen does not affect that much, but the people still going to the cineplex or multiplex is usually going there with friends and have fun and hang out.
Much like pubs, when you can literally drink any kind of drink (mixer, cider, beer) at home, why people still goes to pub? Granted, movie threater would have less and less customer because while most of the movie goer would still want to see the big release, with friends, in a seat that can recline, but the true movie goer, the one that go to see a movie because of the movie, would normally choose to be alone at home, watching it on demand..
I guess that is the main different.
Ya, there will always be a draw to seeing movies in a theater. I saw The Dark Knight in theaters and loved the experience. When I bought the blu-ray and watched it at home, the experience wasn't the same, though I still enjoyed it a lot.
However, not every movie warrants that kind of experience. Sometimes you just want to watch something good without having to go through the trouble of going to a theater.
I think $50 for 48 hours is like a package deal for more than 1 movie or unlimited access to the same movie.
Well, to me, it would only be worth it if multiple movies were being offered for $50. Or if more than three to four people were watching, and it was really good. Blu-rays typically don't cost more than $20-25.
I suspect they are targeting large families with little kids (and home theater people) who simply wait for movies to be available on cable for <$15 instead of paying >$50 to go to the movies. Although for $50 it had better be a really good movie for me not to wait for $15. I have only brought my kids to one movie in the theater (Minions). The rest of the time I simply wait for it to be on cable. I can handle fidgety kids at home better.
Ya, exactly. It's only worth it at that price if multiple people are watching and you don't want to wait.
This is offered in a theater near me. Maybe the food will be better than the movie. The desperate things they do to beg more people to go to the theater instead of watching movies at home is getting more silly by the year.
I wouldn't mind a dine-in experience at movie (if the food was good). There are some nice, higher-end theaters here that do that already. But the movie would have to be pretty good too, or it wouldn't be worth it.
Look what typical theaters have to offer now to get people to go
Wow, I've never been in one of those. I have to drive down to Chula Vista one of these days...