What's new

A step in the wrong direction

The last time that happened it resulted in "1000 Huis lay dead with 4,400 houses destroyed. The PLA used guns, cannons and also aerial bombardment in the campaign"

Shadian incident - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
That is under the instruction of gang of four. Pls do not twist history. All Chinese including Han suffer under gang of four during that era. Nothng to do with religion or minority. Fancy you use such a donkey years ago incident to prove your point? Can you use more latest example(after 2000)? Sorry, you can't. Cos the Hui muslim are happy with CCP. :D
 
.
You have written no proof.

The mere mention that Roosevelt "wanted" a free Indo China, is no "proof."
Are you that incompetent with Internet search 'indochina un trusteeship' ?

Pentagon Papers, Gravel Edition, Summary and Chapter I
I saw Halifax last week and told him quite frankly that it was perfectly true that I had, for over a year, expressed the opinion that Indo-China should not go back to France but that it should be administered by an international trusteeship. France has had the country-thirty million inhabitants for nearly one hundred years, and the people are worse off than they were at the beginning.

As a matter of interest, I am wholeheartedly supported in this view by Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek and by Marshal Stalin. I see no reason to play in with the British Foreign Office in this matter. The only reason they seem to oppose it is that they fear the effect it would have on their own possessions and those of the Dutch. They have never liked the idea of trusteeship because it is, in some instances, aimed at future independence. This is true in the case of Indo-China.

Each case must, of course, stand on its own feet, but the case of IndoChina is perfectly clear. France has milked it for one hundred years. The people of Indo-China are entitled to something better than that.
I guess you are THAT incompetent.
 
.
.
When the France and America interfered into Vietnam, for 29 years, it couldn't unify the parts. When the America troops escaped, Vietnam govt used less one year to unify the whole country.
If China had stayed out of Viet Nam, the country would have never been partitioned from war.
 
.
If China had stayed out of Viet Nam, the country would have never been partitioned from war.

Hey, South Vietnam and North Vietnam partitioned in 1945, at the same time, China was during civil war. Can you read more comprehensive history? Between 1945-1949, why the America didn't support the Vietnamese independence and stand by French re-colonizism war? When France was defeated by North Vietnam, the America immediately meddle into Vietnam war.
How about your opinions of USSR? Another super power in the world at the time.
 
.
Hey, South Vietnam and North Vietnam partitioned in 1945,...
Yeah...Because the Vietnamese communists had help from both France and the Chinese. The Vietnamese civil war created that partition. Do not deny that China entered Viet Nam with solely the intention of spreading communism.
 
.
Yeah...Because the Vietnamese communists had help from both France and the Chinese. The Vietnamese civil war created that partition. Do not deny that China entered Viet Nam with solely the intention of spreading communism.

It's not the Vietnamese civil war created that parition. The reason is South Vietnam would like to be under French/west colonism but North Vietnam want independence. They had totally different view of the country's future and route. Communism is only a tool for the goal (independence), because in the world, only communism USSR/China (after 1949) had some ability to support the help. If the Islam was powerful, I even don't doubt Ho Chi Minh would ask helps from Islam.
 
.
That is under the instruction of gang of four. Pls do not twist history. All Chinese including Han suffer under gang of four during that era. Nothng to do with religion or minority. Fancy you use such a donkey years ago incident to prove your point? Can you use more latest example(after 2000)? Sorry, you can't. Cos the Hui muslim are happy with CCP. :D

Hui are a proud patriotic Chinese. @Syama Ayas

You are wrong, and your knowledge utterly wrong, if you think that Huis have any problem with their fellow Chinese.
 
.
That is under the instruction of gang of four. Pls do not twist history. All Chinese including Han suffer under gang of four during that era. Nothng to do with religion or minority. Fancy you use such a donkey years ago incident to prove your point? Can you use more latest example(after 2000)? Sorry, you can't. Cos the Hui muslim are happy with CCP. :D
They want to make disputes .At least in our school,the only distinguish is pork.They resist west threat with us.(At least they anti Christan :p)They r just ordinary Chinese.
Something that may discourage them:mainstream hui=Muslim Han
 
Last edited:
.
In reality, China tracks and traces Uygurs all around the world, and gets back escaping Uygurs from SE Asia.

Totally reverse of what you are saying.



Wow!

You can never build a society if you ask others to be tortured based on difference in opinion.

The last time this happened on a Mass Scale was in Cultural Revolution, when Mao and Jiang Qing wreaked havoc on everyone.

It all began with the criticism of Mao's Great Leap Forward by Peng Dehuai, a person who was then tortured in house arrest.

I almost forget to reply this post. Escaping Uygurs in your opinion means illegal transportation or not? China don't close immigration door, actually all nationality can migrate overseas through legal method. There ARE Uhghurs migrates live in various of nations, some of them still work to forge China-hostcountry cooperation.
 
.
Engaging Indans here is a waste of time. Big mouth always have to have the last word. Their tactic is to make you pissed off so you swear at them so they can report you. Indian tactics.

@TaiShang
 
.
Debate my ***. That is your Indian "one debate a day keeps progress away" tradition. Get a life!


@ChineseTiger1986

Why shouldn't policy be debated openly so that there can be better feedback?

China's many policies in Xinjiang are indeed not working, as can be seen in increasing violence. Putting pressure on a group of people to give up their beliefs, and to discriminate against them, only radicalizes them, and doesn't improve anything.

@Edison Chen @Chinese Bamboo @Chinese-Dragon @cnleio @cirr @tranquilium @FairAndUnbiased @Beast
 
.
Engaging Indans here is a waste of time. Big mouth always have to have the last word. Their tactic is to make you pissed off so you swear at them so they can report you. Indian tactics.

@TaiShang


Well, sometimes they "gracefully" retreat with the last word like these: "Anything float your boat" or "He is a 50 cents paid by Chinese Gov.".
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom