What's new

5 missiles hit Iraqi base hosting US troops

.

5 missiles hit Iraqi base hosting US troops; no casualties​

By Qassim Abdul-Zahra | AP
May 30, 2022 at 5:39 p.m. EDT



BAGHDAD — At least five missiles hit a sprawling Iraqi army base hosting U.S. troops in the country’s western desert Monday, two Iraqi security officials said.
The officials said the Grad missiles struck inside the Ain al-Asad base in Iraq’s western Anbar province and caused minor damages but no casualties.
Are you on Telegram? Subscribe to our channel for the latest updates on Russia's war in Ukraine.
The officials said the missiles hit only a few meters (yards) from where U.S. forces are stationed. The officals spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to brief media.
The culprits were not immediately known, but the U.S. has previously accused Iran-backed Iraqi militia groups of targeting the American presence in Iraq, including the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.

The attacks were once a frequent occurence, but have lessened in recent months.
In March, Iran attacked Iraq’s northern city of Irbil with a dozen ballistic missiles claiming it was targeting Israeli spy centers. Iraq later said an investigation found there was no Israeli presence in the areas. The attack was also considered a warning to the U.S., a staunch ally of Israel.
U.S.-led coalition forces recently ended their combat mission in Iraq, but continue to play an advisory role to Iraqi forces in the fight against the Islamic State extremist group.



WAPO says no casualties as usual.
 
. .
Who is responsible?
de7d5396776c5654cfa58fb6e26a9f11.jpg
 
. . . . . . .
no warning first let me guess no casualties,they are on the same side,who these Shiites fooling
 
.
And yet the US turn a blind eye on IGRC helping iraqi PMU against ISIS

The situation was slightly more complex. In fact the US stepped in belatedly, after letting down its supposed partners i.e. the Iraqi army and watching on as "I"SIS brought practically half the country under its control.

When the US finally proceeded to intervene it was not just any point time but, surprise surprise, right after the Iranian-backed PMU were done securing Shia-majority areas (where solidarity with the Iranian-led Resistance Axis is a given) and removing "I"SIS from the vicinity, readying themselves to liberate additional regions especially Tikrit and Mosul.

Which, if the US regime had not meddled then, would have led to evenly distributed presence of Iran-friendly groups across the nation and also to a bridging of gaps between communities and a less fragmented Iraqi central state. Prospects that aren't really tolerable to Washington.

_____

no warning first let me guess no casualties,they are on the same side,who these Shiites fooling

Maybe that's why 600+ US occupation troops were eliminated by Iranian-backed Resistance groups at the height of the occupation of Iraq.

___

Iran killed more US troops in Iraq than previously known, Pentagon says​

By Kyle Rempfer
Apr 4, 2019


___

And maybe that's also why today these same pro-Iranian formations are the only ones resisting US occupation through military means.
 
Last edited:
.
You people need the help of Taliban fighters to free your Iraq. Keep firing your missiles for news . As Americans really are not effected by them your not killing any of them. Locals probably are hit by your primitive missile
 
.
The situation was slightly more complex. In fact the US stepped in belatedly, after letting down its supposed partners in the Iraqi army and watching on as "I"SIS brought practically half the country under its control.

When the US finally proceeded to intervene it was not just at any point time but, surprise surprise, right after the Iranian-backed PMU were done cleansing Shia-majority areas (where solidarity with the Iranian-led Resistance Axis is a given) and about to liberate other regions from "I"SIS especially Tikrit and Mosul.

Which, if the US regime had not meddled then, would have led to evenly distributed presence of Iran-friendly groups across the nation and also to a bridging of gaps between communities and a less fragmented Iraqi central state. Prospects that aren't really tolerable to Washington.
LOL! Considering you guys try to make it look like the U.S. shouldn't take some credit fighting ISIS. And in your words, "to evenly distributed presence of Iran-friendly groups across the nation and also to a bridging of gaps between communities and less fragmented Iraqi central state." Thats some BS even from you.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom