masterchief_mirza
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2019
- Messages
- 9,706
- Reaction score
- 17
- Country
- Location
regarding the main topic, we need to stop parroting to the world "we don't want escalation" and "we want peace" blah blah. Our passiveness gives confidence to our enemies that they can kill our kids at will. it is foolish to set an upper limit for ourselves and state that we don't want escalation because India clearly does want escalation. We should say "we will escalate our response until Hindustan desists from targeting civilians" or simply "all options remain on the table to thwart the enemy's potential to attack our civilians". We need to start rewriting the narrative.
The world knows our threats aren't mere rhetoric (balakot).
I am sick of hearing these vagina politicians whining "we want peace", "we don't wish to escalate". Better to stay silent.
I will repeat that. BETTER TO STAY SILENT ...than give your enemy carte Blanche.
Look at Israel. When their civilians die, they don't say "we want peace" or some variation therein. They say "we're coming for you" or they simply respond. I know the analogy isn't totally accurate. However, the language and posturing of our diplomats needs to change to either be more aggressive, or at least deliberately ambiguous e.g. "all options are on the table when it comes to protecting our citizens."
Now we did that in the Balakot episode. Our spokespeople read the correct script, and India have been doubting themselves in such scenarios ever since - because we performed well yes - but also because our narrative didn't limit our options for response. We kept them in full panic mode.
Why have we forgotten the lessons of balakot?
If in doubt about the impact of your words, say as little as possible.
The world knows our threats aren't mere rhetoric (balakot).
I am sick of hearing these vagina politicians whining "we want peace", "we don't wish to escalate". Better to stay silent.
I will repeat that. BETTER TO STAY SILENT ...than give your enemy carte Blanche.
Look at Israel. When their civilians die, they don't say "we want peace" or some variation therein. They say "we're coming for you" or they simply respond. I know the analogy isn't totally accurate. However, the language and posturing of our diplomats needs to change to either be more aggressive, or at least deliberately ambiguous e.g. "all options are on the table when it comes to protecting our citizens."
Now we did that in the Balakot episode. Our spokespeople read the correct script, and India have been doubting themselves in such scenarios ever since - because we performed well yes - but also because our narrative didn't limit our options for response. We kept them in full panic mode.
Why have we forgotten the lessons of balakot?
If in doubt about the impact of your words, say as little as possible.