What's new

27 Feb 19: PAF shot down two Indian aircrafts inside Pakistani airspace: DG ISPR

Bro, that certain friendly nation has been in India's camp for decades with all the hugs to prove it. Other than having diplomatic ties, we share nothing in common with them.

If F-16 was hit and US asked them not to reveal it...what about that scenario?
 
. .
Bro, that certain friendly nation has been in India's camp for decades with all the hugs to prove it. Other than having diplomatic ties, we share nothing in common with them.

If F-16 got hit and US asked them (Indians) not to reveal it...what about that scenario?
Tail could’ve broken off.
No sir not possible ...Its not like erasing something from a drawing board.
 
Last edited:
.
If F-16 was hit and US asked them not to reveal it...what about that scenario?

Bhai its quite straight. The phuphi level of our media and shodapan of our awam. We cant hide any kind of debri any where in Pakistan accept tribal areas which remians a controlled zone
 
. . .
If F-16 was hit and US asked them not to reveal it...what about that scenario?
The only difference is that everyone plays by the US rules. Which is why F-16 were not used for the assault on India.

Both India & Pakistan play by their rules because they're the ones who always threaten sanctions on us. And sticking to the topic in hand, an F-16 was not shot down - and the US knows that. The only interest the US has (currently) is pitching the F-21 (F-16) to India from their end because the F-18 Super Hornet isn't even in the frame of conversation/contender.
 
.
The only difference is that everyone plays by the US rules. Which is why F-16 were not used for the assault on India.

Both India & Pakistan play by their rules because they're the ones who always threaten sanctions on us. And sticking to the topic in hand, an F-16 was not shot down - and the US knows that. The only interest the US has (currently) is pitching the F-21 (F-16) to India from their end because the F-18 Super Hornet isn't even in the frame of conversation/contender.

I was trying to point out that if our F sola got hit and US was asking Indian not to make it to public to save the reputation of Lockheed Martine and its brand F16...India rejected it without giving it a second thought....making it a headline. Similarly, we shotdown, Su30MKI ambassador of that friendly country approached us and asked not to announce it...sale will hurt etc. We, as always, being so submissive, accepted it. despite the fact that it would be like medal of highest performance for PAF for many many yrs to come. That is the difference.
 
.
I was trying to point out that if our F sola got hit and US was asking Indian not to make it to public to save the reputation of Lockheed Martine and its brand F16...India rejected it without giving it a second thought....making it a headline. Similarly, we shotdown, Su30MKI ambassador of that friendly country approached us and asked not to announce it...sale will hurt etc. We, as always, being so submissive, accepted it. despite the fact that it would be like medal of highest performance for PAF for many many yrs to come. That is the difference.
it was a Transactional arrangement, they gave us something, and we returned the favor.....
 
.
I was trying to point out that if our F sola got hit and US was asking Indian not to make it to public to save the reputation of Lockheed Martine and its brand F16...India rejected it without giving it a second thought....making it a headline. Similarly, we shotdown, Su30MKI ambassador of that friendly country approached us and asked not to announce it...sale will hurt etc. We, as always, being so submissive, accepted it. despite the fact that it would be like medal of highest performance for PAF for many many yrs to come. That is the difference.

If it is the case as you say, a medal wouldn't worth what could have been earned by considering such request. Don't read such matters in isolated manner rather, look at it in broader aspects..... I mean more further or farther than any civilian can think about. Speaking of Honour, these medals are to inform enemy and current success has already made to almost every military out there beside the rival hence, I don't see wearing medal could be more worthy than what can be achieved, more than public stunts. We shouldn't be like rivals that will go gaga for medals only where achievements are known to us by one way or another.
 
.
I was trying to point out that if our F sola got hit and US was asking Indian not to make it to public to save the reputation of Lockheed Martine and its brand F16...India rejected it without giving it a second thought....making it a headline. Similarly, we shotdown, Su30MKI ambassador of that friendly country approached us and asked not to announce it...sale will hurt etc. We, as always, being so submissive, accepted it. despite the fact that it would be like medal of highest performance for PAF for many many yrs to come. That is the difference.
F16 claim is stupidity ...

Su30 mki is not announced coz we dont wanted to escalate it further but do u really think that defence circles dont know the actual outcome then u r living in fools world ... everyone in the defence circle knows the actual outcome and there is no way russia can request pak as these things r not like we internet warrior pretend ...
 
.
F16 claim is stupidity ...

Su30 mki is not announced coz we dont wanted to escalate it further but do u really think that defence circles dont know the actual outcome then u r living in fools world ... everyone in the defence circle knows the actual outcome and there is no way russia can request pak as these things r not like we internet warrior pretend ...
I know ...met a Chinese delegation last week...the first sentence after hello hi, was " how about our JF17 performance?" they were delighted like Chinese have got real treasure. just amazing.

If it is the case as you say, a medal wouldn't worth what could have been earned by considering such request. Don't read such matters in isolated manner rather, look at it in broader aspects..... I mean more further or farther than any civilian can think about. Speaking of Honour, these medals are to inform enemy and current success has already made to almost every military out there beside the rival hence, I don't see wearing medal could be more worthy than what can be achieved, more than public stunts. We shouldn't be like rivals that will go gaga for medals only where achievements are known to us by one way or another.

Nailed it.
 
.
If that's the case, then there is no (further) need to discuss the type of fighter that went down on other Topics, because clearly the evidence is pointed towards a Sukhoi.

I just hope this silence from our end will have a fruitful outcome from this friendly nation (at some point), because to date, they've always sided with our counterparts.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom