Search results

And yet you continue to respond to our comments. That is a strange way of showing not caring.

Isn't it the whole point? That GoI has its own definition of 'azaadi'. I hope you do know the meaning of 'interlocutor'. If not, check the dictionary.:no:

'Outside Indian constitution' doesn't necessarily mean secession. Even if autonomy is to be offered it will be outside Indian constitution because, except for Article 370, which grants limited autonomy and is temporary in nature, there is no other provision allowing such arrangement. And that...

Regardless of premature ejaculation of our Pakistani member here, I like the subtlety here. Amendment of Constitution is inevitable for the solution of Kashmir. If autonomy is to be given to Kashmir, it would require Constitutional amendment. If Article 370 is to be revoked, it would require...

Considering the fact that the Pakistani genocide of Bengalis in East Pakistan, in a matter of months, is considered as the one of the worst genocides after Hitler and Pol Pot, you have some nerve pointing fingers at India.

You forgot the most import one: More Chinese than actual Chinese In a nutshell, they are everything and everyone, but Pakistanis. (Sometimes they are more Indian Muslims than actual Indian Muslims. But other times, Indian Muslims are not Muslims at all.)

Hardliners will be hardliners, no matter what. There is a reason why they are called hardliners. Ms Roy's comments - if she had actually said what it is being claimed - have put the liberals in a very tight corner. Its the liberals, not the hardliners, who are key to any solution. Most...

So the cat is out of the bag eh? Not that it was ever in the bag, but for those bleeding heart 'freedom' e-fighters, claiming that their country supports 'azadi' (independence) of Kashmir, it is probably time to take off their blinkers. After all those keyboard battles, here is a minister...

It is only a certain section of Pakistanis that call Kashmir an unfinished agenda of partition. But then when one reminds them of what happened during partition, suddenly it is a 'pathetic attempt to deflect attention'. Regardless of how many Pakistanis were autochthonous to the land which...

Sure you can, at least in South Asia. Jinnah sahib taught us that.

Geelani sahib has a funny way of fighting 'the occupying entity'. While he fights it, he doesn't hesitate to grab with both hands all the perks extended to him by the same 'occupying entity', like all expense paid medical benefit. Strangely enough, rejecting such handouts by his foe doesn't...

Geelani would be more than welcome to denounce his Indian citizenship and become citizen of any other country, if he so chooses. But we are not getting that lucky, are we? I am pretty sure that you haven't read that document yourself. If you had you would have realised how the Constitution...

Because the genius made his comments in Delhi, where the IPC has jurisdiction.

According to The Central Laws (Extension To Jammu And Kashmir) Act, 1968, the following Acts are directly applicable to J & K. The Official Trustees Act, The Motor Vehicles Act, The Chartered Accountants Act, The Cost and Works Accountants Act, The Transfer of Prisoners Act, The Road...

I know this will not be liked by my co-citizens, but this is what Omar had referred to as 'acceded but not yet merged'. Garibji, I understand your sentiments, but unfortunately law is law. Section 1 of IPC clearly states: "This act shall be called the Indian Penal Code, and shall extend to the...

I hear this a lot from many Pakistanis. Now will you do me a favour and point to a resolution, communique, press release or any official UN document that categorically says that Kashmir is not part of India.

What a tragic fall for a gifted one-novel-wonder. Indian Penal Code is not applicable in Jammu & Kashmir. So sedition committed in J & K can't be booked under that Act. The same, however is punishable if committed anywhere else in India. If what she has said in Delhi falls under the...

That exactly how pragmatic people think. :tup:

As long as the State of India considers them citizen, the State will act accordingly. Don't loose too much sleep on that. Btw, you claim that Kashmiris are not citizens of India, but that doesn't stop you from claiming remedy according to Indian constitution. Hypocrisy?

A country can't open an embassy in another country till the later recognizes the former's sovereignty. Besides several agreements between Pakistan and India have been conclude since the creation of Bangladesh. So the argument that current Pakistan somehow is not the same Pakistan mentioned in...