Search results

Petition · United Nations: Get our (Spy) Pigeon released from India · Change.org

His Lordship upholding Rule of Law in White Shalwar Kameez: Pertinent to mention is that an area as critical as Bannu, no leverage in security SOPs can be granted to anyone. There is a history of attacks on this cantonment. His Lordship was also fully aware that earlier in 2009 a suicide...

The name Siachen is not used for once inside the text of Karachi Agreement. Baki, bhai ab mujhy shama do. Cant digest any more of your rants.

Para B 2 (d) says as you have quoted: From Dalunang eastwards the cease-fire line will follow the general line point 15495, Ishman, Manus, Gangam, Gunderman, Point 13620, Funkar (Point 17628), Marmak, Natsara, Shangruti (Point 1,531), Chorbat La (Point 16700), Chalunka (on the Shyok River)...

Bhai, first decide, was a straight line to be drawn or actual demarcation on ground was to be carried out basing on actual terrain, because these two are very different things. After ground demarcation, the alignment of CFL would have been very very different from a straight line up north. And...

You want a short answer? How about because of commonsense?

Wait, you want to say that as per Karachi Agreement the so called CFL which, as assumed by Indians extended beyond NJ 9842, was to be demarcated on ground, after the agreement? My entire focus (for now -including the other thread i opened) is to educated you and your fellow Indians that as per...

Just because the guys working on Karachi Agreement knew that one day, 'geniuses' like you, the hunter guy and the the one who still idolizes spinach would overload their commonsense and fail to understand simple English. So, they also prepared a map for their easy comprehension, but they also...

Here, comes the function of commonsense. Being the last recognizable, known and explored point in that area, the reference to '..khor, thence north' would mean the CFL ends at that last 'recognizable' point, not to some la la land. Lol. Kashmir 'legally' acceded to india, but then the KA-1949...

No. But neither does it give it to India. That's the whole debate is about. It is you guys who like to think by 'thence north-ing' the KA-49 somehow gave Siachen to you. Nevertheless, Siachen belonged to Pakistan, as accepted and displayed by the international community.

The map is from an Indian book (Essential documents and notes on Kashmir dispute, 1958), written by an Stockholm-based journalist of Indian origin namely P. L. Lakhanpal and published by 'New Delhi: International Publications' in 1958, and the hence the map is an Indian (fcuking) map...

Are you actually that stupid or you are just pretending to be one? One one side you agree that Karachi Agreement was 'silent on points beyond NJ9842', but in the same breath you again try to shove BS down our throats by saying that 'thence north to the glacier' imply that the CFL extends beyond...