Search results

So thats why its ok for the state to get involved in marriage and trample over basic rights?? because she makes a "bigger sacrifice" as declared by you or inconvenience she may face in rehabilitation center or elsewhere? So you admit the fact that this law tramples over basic rights but now you...

Yes it does trample basic human rights on grounds that are quite vague, just needs to be shown that "violence has been committed or is likely to be committed".Imagine how easy it will be to establish that in a domestic violence case. Once that is established, and the man fails to rebut it, the...

In your post 222 Cleric terms Women’s Protection Bill contrary to Islamic Sharia you put a lot of allegations on me as well as personal attacks/insults: To which i responded: You have not substantiated any of those allegations with evidence(repeating those allegations in different wordings...

Ah i was wondering when the snide comments, personal attacks, shaming tactics and guilt tripping would start. You would make a good proper feminazi :enjoy: What?? i said nothing of the sort, stop making things up! this is what i said: did you even bother reading that?? again i said nothing...

As i have said many times : It is quite clear form the text that if it is established that he has done "violence" or is likely to commit violence which he fails to disprove, he stands to loose his property.(If you read the protection order and residence order, then this fact is undeniable.) The...

Thats quite a bold claim. A true Muslim will be too humble a person make such an arrogant claim as this.

That implies that men and women are fundamentally different thus requiring different laws to deal with their issues. If the difference is recognized at legislative level, then where does that leave the claims of equality? Woah! easy there! whats with the huge text? Why shouldn't we fear when...

True but Prima facie in murder or armed robbery or terrorism case is one thing, here we are talking about domestic violence. All that needs to be established is that "the defendant has committed an act of violence or is likely to commit an act of violence".Imagine how easy it will be to...

what about his right to be innocent until proven guilty? what about his right to his own property? what about his right to be the head of the household?(thats a right in islam too weather aunties like it or not) you cant selectively apply Islam when it suits you and throw it out of the window...

......i have already pointed it out several times o_O Well that depends on who the property belongs to, if the man is the owner and they cant get along then the woman moves out, if the woman is the owner then the man moves out, makes sense no? It is how it is weather somebody likes it or...

And how do we solve this problem? by forcefully taking the mans property and giving it to the woman? Claiming to get rid of one injustice you create an even bigger one, as if this country isnt plagued with enough problems already! Look at the text: "On receipt of the complaint, the Court shall...

Plenty has been said regarding the problems of this law weather you see it from religious or non religious viewpoint.Check the preceding pages.

I am sure a lot of men get killed as a result of violence and crime in Pakistan too.Yes we have a serious crime problem in our society and thats because we dont have a properly working justice system and police force.The common man cant get justice. The only way to end such violence is to ensure...

"On receipt of the complaint, the Court shall issue a notice to the defendant calling upon him to show cause within seven days of the receipt of notice as to why any order under this Act may not be made and if the defendant fails to file a reply within the specified time, the Court, subject to...

third paragraph from the link you posted : " The Islamic medicine has faithfully preserved, systematized and further developed the medical knowledge of the classical antiquity.[3] During the post-classical era, Islamic medicine was the most advanced in the world, integrating concepts of the...

Just because the British played a major part in the creation of both doesn't make both right or wrong. Its how they did it that matters.As i said before : One was made to accommodate the popular demand of the local population(without getting into the merits of it), the other to accommodate...

British India was made of many states, the states that later came to comprise Pakistan (Punjab,Bengal, Sind, etc) were Muslim majority.So the people it was carved out for were a majority to begin with in those states.

The states making Pakistan had majority Hindu population? of course not. And these were indigenous people, not foreign settlers. Not that it has anything to do with the current topic.Which is why i said before, apples and oranges.

Apples and Oranges, in case of the partition of the subcontinent, at least some effort was done to respect the wishes of the native population. Pakistan took a principled stand not to recognize a country created by oppressing the native population of that land. Just like the refusal to...

All countries use/have used proxies for pursuing their interests, including India, no one is innocent in that regard. Thousands of civilians died in countless terrorist attacks in Pakistan before and after Mumbai 2008, including the samjhota express incident where about 70 people were burned...