No it doesnt downplay..it just states that this system isn't capable to strike down any MASSIVE nukes from Russia targeted at its enemy...
I can bet you haven't read the article...
The autho also states that [when compared with STATIC ABM bases] Russia can be highly endangere by mobile...
This is quiet true. One must realise that Russians when compared to Europeans & Americans delivered products at a fraction of a cost...& perhaps US can do the same; but why not leech out some extra dollars from the congress...US however, did marvelled the Russian engines & has shown good respect...
DefenceDog: Concrete Proposals to Make NATO's Future Nuclear Policy Work
& a very very great read DefenceDog: Real Face of U.S. ABM system in Europe
See the documentary here: DefenceDog: Sputnik Declassified
Author mentions that US can outrun the Soviets in satellite race by more than a decade but the then President vetoed all such space ambitions; as he didn't want US to set a predicament for a Space race or more still space...
@ http://www.defence.pk/forums/military-aviation/57224-burraq-ucav-will-fly-next-year-10.html#post1769915
Respected sir,
Hope you be in good health. I have updated discussion; do pay a visit
regards;;
Irfan Baluch; as I have got your permission to reproduce your reply on another forum...i got a very ECONOMICAL reply to your post by a Russian based expert namely GarryB:
The requirement to keep tracking the target after weapon release is a good thing... not a bad thing. Fire and forget...
I don't make things out of my mind...Speed of Shaheen II isn't publicised so I can't comment...but what I can comment that we have demonstrated an upped hand in speed in the development of Shaheen I missile with respect to Agni II so why isn't it legit that I too suppose that Shaheen II also...
Reading too much WIKI both of you
@ MissileThreat :: Agni-3
your warhead for now is a kiloton class....
ummmmm busted
....not again the WIKI; remember the same WIKI stated a CEP of 30-50m for Shaheen II
& regarding the range of Agni III; I repeat don't get urself much proudly. Just...
I am praying at my best that India must successfully deploy such MIRVed SLBMs...bcz this will set a precedent for Pakistan developing the same & probably a better one.:pakistan:
Full story: DefenceDog: MiG Failed But Not Forgotten: MMRCA Defeat…
Abstracts:
But the Americans relentlessly exposed the yard. And not just naked politics brazenly interfered in the matter. Washington is very sparingly and reluctantly goes to the transfer of technologies...
Translated by another person:
New rocket SMF invulnerable to all parts of the flight and are able to break through any possible missile defense in the next 20 years
This is the first time I have come across RS-24 being described in quite detail
For Pakistan (to have a good chance of win) we will go for pre-emptive strike. Now the problem with first strike is that our country (because its relatively less spacious) can be in return busted by Indian nukes.
So what we have to do is to neutralise the enemy missiles & especially that of...
I am nt buying the fact regarding environmental concerns...every extraction is accompanied by environmental concerns!! Shale gas must be utilised & we can welcome the efforts of multi-national companies in this field.
I must mention here that a giant company like Gazprom is strictly against...
Sir Santro your replies are really true to bone...
However, may I ask that provided the US can & would (if time comes) jam our radars..wouldnt we be warned that something is blanketing our surveillance? I mean atleast then we can mobilise some 5-6 aircrafts & look for intrusion. This would...
The bold part is just ridiculous...
The most effective SAMs...The most Effective antiship missiles...The most effective ICBM...The most effective space rockets...do you want me to go on.
Listen first & foremost you must acknowledge that the only country that can beat US TECHNICALLY isn't UK...