Search results

Aren't the Radar (NIIP Tikhomirov N001VE) ; Engine (AL-31) & even the cannon (Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-1)...all Russian in Chinese J-11??

^^ Amerikans love to make things complex not because they can't make things simple but because the defence companies can earn an extra buck from congress...Look at the soviet machinery; look at their modern BMPs & the US equivalent namely Bradley...

DefenceDog: The First Missiles South Asian Giant

2S19 Msta - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (based on this) Look at the new version... 1] Crew reduced to three 2] Twin guns 3] Barrel length increased 4] More gadgets will be introduced for greater range acquisition...thermal sights & such 5] GLONASS integration

The twin guns with much longer barrels clearly shows a focus on increased rate of fire (two guns) and long range (long barrels).

^^ Complexity doesnt necessarily means inferiority..also the fig shows more amount of hardware in Amerikan machine

@ All Chinese pros... Sir(s) can you shed some light upon the hull modifications in the icebreakers as opposed to normal ships. I mean how the hull is adopted to suffer extreme conditions & yet cut through ice like a knife...Technical links will be much appreciated regards;;

Radial Engine Powered Motorcycle Will sure make a huge sound....& will take a robust battery to prime the oil for starting radial engine...function that was supposed to be easy in planes by just rotating the huge propeller in front...such is missing in bike.

Pakistan needs no planes from Russia for now just their Air Defence systems more preferable ABM systems

Well Russians have good aggressive features just look at their Klub & Onyx antiship missiles & you can't find any Western equivalent. Gosh NATO seriously is worried of such hypersonic threats.

As far as I know it depends on following factors Primary Factors 1] Propellant in missile 2] Direction of incoming target 3] Speed of incoming target 4] Direction of launch vehicle 5] Speed of launch vehicle (Russian R-77 (RVV-AE) Missile launched from JF-17 has relatively reduced range than...

A beautiful slideshow regarding Chinese naval developments... DefenceDog: Beijing's Blue-Water Navy-Image Gallery

You don't need F-35 because MiG-29k has more than enough punch even more than F-35 in terms of weapon loads & capabilities...Look here DefenceDog: PAK-FA [T-50] Latest Armaments Surely you can see the latest developments in missile as applied to T-50 can to be adopted by Mig-35/29 SU-27/30/35

^^ I do acknowledge that problem is not only economy but VTOL fighters for which these carriers were certainly designed for (harriers) have become weak contenders in aviation fight. However, when given the option to a country with tight budgets but still an ally of US I must say the deployment...

any air to air brahmos news

do add eng subtitles

yessss its a good weapon

Its quiet an incomplete analysis; if you are talking about future then just wait for 15 years & Russian carriers will be quiet lethal with naval based MiG & Sukhoi planes, with a big load of all-feared P-500 family missiles. The article also never mentions that why US is improving its ESSM...

Full article: DefenceDog: Awaiting Disturbance-Afghanistan, Pakistan & Israel Abstracts: expansion of operational activities of terrorist organizations in Pakistan and India and the weakening of nuclear Pakistan with the possible disintegration of its medium-term Borders with Iran and...

Very very good thread; must mention this on my blog