Search results

Because unlike US helis Russian helis don't have to hover to launch antiquated TOWs; They launch Ataka/Shturm while diving up/down

But then what about us & Afghanistan (DuranD lINE)

The girl spoke intellectually proving with historical facts...that what I want to say

No; each Pantsir can take out several Spikes get the picture:wave:

So a white cloth-like layer with thousands of diamond structures that is pasted infront of my microwave oven glass door is an example of FSS?...avoid egress of microwaves

I think Russian understanding for fire-forget as pointed out earlier is different: “Fire and forget:” Engineers unveil new missile system | Video | RIA Novosti for top attack this is going to happen...or just with bullets

Well everything is clear to me now; after users here had provided pics of operational Hermes I think I told 500 that beam riding such as Kornet only requires 1/240th of incident laser power & they are very prone to jamming simply because the brain of missile is facing rearwards towards the...

This is true...

The very unique engine of Beriev-200 Type of engines D-436TP - take-off power, kgf 2x7500 - cruise power, kgf 2x1500 a very good post by an MIT professor http://www.maximizingprogress.org/2010/07/beriev-be-200-russian-amphibian.html

What is this name?

^^Impressed by your knowledge Lidsky:meeting: Plus I also add up that Spike systems that have to vertically fall on top of the target are prone to be neutralised by systems (that usually accompany armoured vehicles) like Pantsir-M1/Tunguska; while such can't be said about a horizontal trajectory...

This will may be my last post in this section;as I have already given you ample proof that Russians are able to create fire-forget projectiles but economically that ain't feasible. Rather they have created an awesome ATGM Kornet family whose operation is NLOS (...& I think you again are feeling...

I would like to know again...giv me a link please

you have given me something really good to study upon...thnx

Not only money but technical expertise too are essential in defence market...no doubt Chinese will get Russian assistance in mega projects like their aircraft carrier. DefenceDog: Chinese Aircraft Carrier: The History Of Discovery And Development Prospects DefenceDog: The Chinese Are Coming...

you are requested here: http://www.defence.pk/forums/military-forum/40472-rafael-releases-new-member-spike-family-spike-nlos-3.html

So you again & again are asserting (despite the more clearer & UN-ambiguous source I provided) that its technology limitation of Russians that inhibit fire & forget development.... but yes not many SACLOS systems (according to WIKI) can do this I said Relatively. Already you have known about...

You must NOT be called 'Neutral' anymore:blink:

Relatively simple & cheap...for destroying armoured division enmasse mine preference would be a system like Smerch/Tornado rather TV guided bombs!! TV guided, I don't know why you don't admit are & will always be expensive because of the embedded precious electronic in them...as is explained...

More & more & more jammers & countermeasures against missiles or in general against any missile that is smart...one thing you can't jam in RPG & one thing you can't jam & hard-hit is a cannon ball. It seems that in WW1 every thing is stalemate because of those machine-guns no one dare get out of...