The Pakistan government is facing new threat from rapid influx of Afghani's across the border. Lots of Afghani's are crossing the border every day and officials say in the coming years they are expecting an increase in the numbers. As NATO forces are pulling out of Afghanistan and American aid...
My whole concerned was that we shouldn't get euphoric about these international events. International affairs are not run on an emotional basis. Saudi's always took Pakistanis as 'Maskins' poors, they don't have any emotional attachment with Pakistan. This is the ground reality.
We have seen in the last couple of decades the way media have created a hype and emotional wave. Saudi Arabia has been always portrayed as very close to Pakistan. First of all oil money has changed the mindset of Saudi's, their dealing with Pakistan is just like giving something to a beggar...
Seems, nobody is interested in emotional hype of the media.
Actually, I am very concerned with the media's emotional aspect. Media shape up the minds of lots of people.
The Dunaya e News has recently reported about the Saudi military exercise. The newspaper has stated that these exercises are giving a message to the U.S. that Saudi Arabia is now not dependent on the U.S. And Gen Raheel was given a seat next to Prince Mutab, this was also giving the message to...
Nawaz Sharif is leveling his scores with the army. He is again playing with fire. He was responsible to take action against such a blatant statement by the channel.
No state in the world allows its media channel to degrade its institutions and put allegation against them.
People should also try to stay away from these tabloid media channels.
I don't know, where Pakistan stands in a Saudi Iran relationship.
Won't it be better, if Pakistan take care of its matter first than the world affairs.
The topic here is the status given to a highest functionary of the state and how that status is protected by the state, constitution, parliament and the ruling party?
( CIA/ senate, rejected the Obama's nomination of ambassadors in different countries, Obama administration has to talk back...
Then why they blamed ISI.
The ideal situation would be if ISI or Amry has any reservation with any media persons, media houses have to fire those people. In the U.S CIA disapproval puts people out of job.
The protection and status given to CIA or FBI is not a respect, it is a role given to them to protect and save the country from internal and external enemies. These agencies are protected constitutionally in the U.S.Media is not allowed to humiliate and demean them unless and until prior...
They humiliated and demeaned a higher functionary of the state. If Geo would be in the U.S it was banned by this time and all its owners would be imprisoned.
Reporting on one of the biggest functionary of the state like this is a crime.
You started a good topic, how the media in the U.S talk about CIA or FBI. We all know or agree with this, the media don't start any sort of demeaning and humiliating war against those organizations. The intelligence agencies are given the very high level in the society. Any sort of news or story...
I think, the media and the government has handled this case very badly. Army and intelligence agencies are the backbone of the country, demeaning them in this way is not good for the country. There was the case in the United States, in which a journalist leaked the CIA informant in the white...
Javed Ch. in his April 23 article on Express News wrote a very good analysis of Hamid Mir case. He gave an example of an elephant how to tame an elephant and what not to do with the elephant. He quoted that example on the Pakistan Army. His analysis is really very powerful. The Army everywhere...