I think both countries from the very beginning has taken some very wrong directions. Now its difficult to tell what really is going on. Both countries need to work together. As far as CPEC is concerned I think India should also be a part of it. They should also be benefited from it.
Greater Afghanistan, Greater Baluchistan, Sindhu Desh, Jinnah pur, and Azad Kashmir and Gilgit Baltistan India is interested. Point is what is then left with Pakistan, only Sharif's (Nawaz sharif, Shabaz Sharif, Raheel Sharif, Chief Justice Sharif, Mariyum Sharif and Qandeel Sharif). It is a lose lose...
Instead of talking about" consequences", I think both countries should use CPEC. I would say instead of naming CPEC (China-Pakistan Economic Corridor ) it should be called SAEC ( South Asian Economic Corridor). All the countries of the region should be benefited from it. In return Pakistan...
That's really great. Both countries should work for the development of Kashmir. Military should also be moved from Kashmir. Plebiscite should be held to know what Kashmri's want.
Kashmr is not even good for India. Kashmir will evoke separatist movements in India. More aggressive India will play more seperatist move will start in India. Even it is good for India to solve this Kashmir issue. Kashmir could be an independent country, both India and Pakistan jointly hold its...
Both countries should reduce their military budgets and spend money on human development.
Instead of revenge game both countries should now change their narrative. Both countries should work together.
I don't think this is a good idea. India should support all discussion forum. We should work for greater South Asia.
I think both PM should also meet every year, once in India and than in Pakistan. Same is the case with army chief, both army chief's should see each other every year.
I just read this four point formula, I was also saying the same thing: demilitarization, joint mechanism for both countries, self-governance and removing the LOC to just a line on the map. I completely agree with these points. Both countries have gradually come to de-militarization. Gradually...
I completely agree with you, for India access to Ladhakh and Kargil will be compromised and one important thing you missed is the water sources coming from Kashmir. Both countries has big concern on their water sources in Kashmir. No one wants to loose those sources.
I agree with you when you...
1) I agree with you that both countries are not interested in independent Kashmir.
2) To judge who wants to stay with India and who wants independence, a plebiscite is the best option. In spite of all the demographic changes in the last 70 years India is not agreed on the plebiscite.
3)...
If this status quo could be a viable solution we won't have this much bloodshed in Kashmir. Even if Pakistan accepts this solution, Kashmiri's won't accept it. Gradually both countries have to give control to Kashmiri's and then independent Kashmir and later on, this could be a world financial...
First of all these sorts of arrangements are under international agreements. We have an example of Hong Kong and Singapore. Second, this is foolish the way Kashmir is controlled. Whole stupidity going on in the Kashmir will create more unrest in the rest of country. Third, Gwader in...
There should be a clear cut demarcation between the violence and human rights violations. I think the fate of Kashmir should be given in the hands of Kashmiri's not the rest of India. Kashmir could be made a free trade zone. It could be a Switzerland of Asia. Lets talk about this.
Good things...
I completely acknowledge Baluchistan as a Pakistani territory. Gwadar port is an easy transit route from Middle east for oil and other goods. These economic opportunities should be used by all the countries like Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, China and Independent Russian Republics. We should work...