Search results

Unlike Pakistan, I suppose. What was Pakistan (and your ancestors) doing those 1000 years? Being victorious? As I said before, every inch of your country was defeated and plundered those thousand years. Most parts of today's India were not.

You would be more believable if you had actually held your tongue, instead of spouting this gem: After that pathetic venting due to the inability to answer meaningfully, you cannot pretend that you were merely "holding your tongue". It was anything but. Sorry boy, you have amply demonstrated...

Unable to defeat? You mean, other than cutting you into two? Yea, sure. Who do you think trained the belligenrents in the civil war? Who do you think organized, armed and trained battalion after battalion of 'Mukti Bahini's right under your nose? And you think it was fully a civil war? That...

LOL. Thanks, I love the sound of a loser's frustrated abuses. Such eloquence, such power of persuation.

After the first line, you merely repeated an older post of yours. As I said, the post had nothing substantial, just your assertion of what Indians think. It is futile to respond to such assertions, because they are merely rhetorical, not substantive. If you are referring to the lines about the...

Then why doesn't USA celebrate the quelling of the Whiskey rebellion, or the Mexico-American war of 1898? Why doesn't Britain celebrate every single battle or war it has won every year? The battles and wars of WW1 and WW2 were existential, hence celebrated frequently.

I know you did not respond, but how am I to know whether your lack of response is a deliberate act of ignoring, or a lack of having a response at all? If it was the former, you had the choice to continue doing so. But you didn't, did you? You chose to respond, albeit with the rather...

Ask your army, which has launched several unsuccesful counter attacks to retake Siachen. Musharaff himself has commanded a unit in 1987, trying to retake Siachen from India. All attempts failed of course. If you want to know the advantage of occupying high terrain in mountain warfare, again...

Because of Pakistan military's idiotic and ill conceived strategy, that "the defence of the east lies in the west". Pakistani military planners believed that concentrating forces on the west would make India afraid of attacking the east. It was a stupid doctrine, and India exploited it to the...

To occupy the commanding heights of Siachen glacier. We did so, and continue to do so today.

Yes. And India won in both those - because India achieved her aims. But Pakistan did not achieve the aims of the acts of war it started, and therefore by any definition, they lost.

It was 0 miles away from Pakistan - it was Pakistan. If you had lost west Pakistan instead of east, you would be saying that west Pakistan was thousands of miles away. If you didn't know to allocate resources judiciously in both parts of your country, that's your mistake. There were more...

You must study a lot of things. The fact is that the IAF had some 6 mig-21s, and no operational squadrons. The migs were used for defensive purposes, and that experience was invaluable - it led to IAF deciding to make it their primary fighter jet. But to claim that India had superiority...

1) Maybe so - but mig-21s played no part in the aerial war. Just as MKIs did not take part in the Kargil war, and for the same reason. 2) Link please. And please name the American weaponry and equipments we used, as I asked you before. (You asserted they were trained and armed by Americans...

Other aircrafts. Could you give a link to that, about destroying mig-21s on the ground in 1965? The mig-21s were purchased only a year before, and there were no trained pilots or enough numbers to put it in operational service. There was not even a squadron in existence. (If I remember...

To teach Pakistan that any attempt to take Kashmir would lead to all out war. BTW how does it matter if it was at night? Do Pakistani armymen go home at night, and only work during the day? Was India's attack covert? You think night or day makes any difference to the detectability of armoured...

Wrong on all counts. India did not have mig-21s in the 1965 war. The Indian mountain divisions were not trained and armed by Americans. Could you name the American weapons and armament they used, with supporting links for your claims? The Indian aircraft carrier played no role in the war...

And don't teach us abbout bravery, when your armymen have dishonorably entered India without any uniform or insignia, and never dared to fight face to face. In 1999, your country went so far as to disown them. Did the "brave" commandos fight face to face in Op Gibraltar? No, they entered...

"Brave India" put the Gibraltar "commandos" in jail, where they remained for the duration of the war, eating sarkari food. The "brave" commandos were betrayed by the locals whom they came to "liberate", and arrested by the Kashmir police. What sort of bravery do you expect us to do to them...

1947 is one thing, 1962-65 is another. The Indian army had not modernized or expanded since then. It was always bereft of funding, due to the idiocy of the govt. Nehru in initially thought that India wouldn't need a military at all, just a large police force would do. Only in 1962 did they...